Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 20 Jul 2025, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 2:32 pm

I know.

People take child sex trafficking WAY too seriously. We all need to cool our jets.

Keep the faith, MAGA. You don't have to UNDERSTAND 5D chess. You just need to trust the president is playing it, when he lets child rapsists continue eating caviar instead of prison chow.

You obviously  have access to so much more privileged information than every one else...[but you aren't at liberty to discuss it here with us]
Like that Col Flagg character on M.A.S.H..    
 
 
 

Mrkelly » 20 Jul 2025, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 3:39 pm

what do you see more as “lack of self control? ?

Well Dribbles...

you're inability to not run away....plus you're a tattle tale...imagine that?...a grown man who runs and tells on people

Thought tattle tales grow up in 3rd or 4th grade?....not you tho
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 20 Jul 2025, 4:14 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 4:14 pm

Cannonpointer » 20 Jul 2025, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 2:32 pm

I know.

People take child sex trafficking WAY too seriously. We all need to cool our jets.

Keep the faith, MAGA. You don't have to UNDERSTAND 5D chess. You just need to trust the president is playing it, when he lets child rapists continue eating caviar instead of prison chow.

You obviously  have access to so much more privileged information than every one else...[but you aren't at liberty to discuss it here with us]
Like that Col Flagg character on M.A.S.H..  

Yes, yes - there's a whole lot of secret information undergirding the post that you responded to.

I would tell you where I got the opinion that we should protect children from sex fiends, but then I would have to kill you.
 

Cannonpointer » 20 Jul 2025, 6:07 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 6:07 pm

Yeds, yes - there's a whole lot of secret information ubndergirding the post that you responded to.

I would tell you where I got the opinion that we should protect children from sex fiends, but then I would have to kill you.

  Don't be so modest...!
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 20 Jul 2025, 6:10 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 6:10 pm

  Don't be so modest...!

Okay, I will share a SMIDGE. But keep it toyourself, Everyone else is on their honor not to watch it. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3S-C7hZn2Y
 

Cannonpointer » 20 Jul 2025, 8:34 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 8:34 pm

Okay, I will share a SMIDGE. But keep it toyourself, Everyone else is on their honor not to watch it. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3S-C7hZn2Y

https://unn.ua/en/news/90-days-or-more- ... ps-arrival
Even half of the Las Vegas Odds Makers were fooled.
Amazing work that the young man is doing while he monitors the situation in Ukraine.
He paints a very different picture than what  we are getting at home.

*GHETTOBLASTER » 20 Jul 2025, 9:57 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 9:57 pm

https://unn.ua/en/news/90-days-or-more- ... ps-arrival
Even half of the Las Vegas Odds Makers were fooled.
Amazing work that the young man is doing while he monitors the situation in Ukraine.
He paints a very different picture than what  we are getting at home.

His primary focus is Asia. But the **** in Coupkraine plays into the coming war in Asia, so he keeps an eye on that as well.

All he does is listen. He listens to the people who are calling the shots. 

He reads their papers, and he believes that they will enact the policies that they say they will enact. And he notices that those policy papers - not the various presidents and congress people - govern America's politics on the world stage.

"This is our plan," those Rand Corporation and Heritage Foundation and Atlanitic Council papers say. "This is their plan," he then says to his readers and viewers - and then he then chronicles for his readers and viewers the unfolding of those published, publicly available action plans. 

When people ask me why I know what is going on - generally with an implied accusation that I don't know **** and I'm just making **** up, - guys like this are part of the answer. The other part is that my instincts are not atrophied as are those of 99% ofr Americans, most of whom have a cartoon understanding of their world and feet that never touch the ground. I actually listen to and honor my instincts, and I walk barefoot. And our instincts are tapped into universal truths - the same truths that guide a newborn colt to his mama's teat and a newborn turtle to the bosom of the sea. The same truths that are never going to excuse covering up for child rapists.

I am not naive. I understand better than most on this board that Trump HAS to squelch those tapes and that list. That is the table he is sitting at. That is the room he is in. But that's his **** problem. I didn't make him run his fat stupid mouth and promise the release of those files. And those of his true believers who make excuses for his failure to deliver on that promise are as full of **** as the leftards who screech against him for it. There are REASONS Trump does not release those tapes. There is no excuse for it. He is on the side of the baby rapers. He likes the cool kids' table.
 
 

Cannonpointer » 20 Jul 2025, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 2:32 pm

I know.

People take child sex trafficking WAY too seriously. We all need to cool our jets.

Keep the faith, MAGA. You don't have to UNDERSTAND 5D chess. You just need to trust the president is playing it, when he lets child rapsists continue eating caviar instead of prison chow. 
 

What is the purpose to the game of chess regardless which dimensional interpretation being played between 2 or more people or AI bots? Psychological control of each brain over those playing the game. It creates typecasting a social order in 64 squared game board. with 32 pieces 18 pieces(16 pawns and 2 kings) can only move one space at a time. 4 knights can only move 2 spaces(one straight and one diagonal). 4 rooks can only move in straight perpendicular lines, 4 bishops in diagonal directions on the color. 2 queens that can go in any direction.

Trains brains to only follow linear equations outside equally living proportionately inhabiting space spontaneously separated simultaneously alive.

nefarious101 » 20 Jul 2025, 4:45 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2025, 4:45 pm

Well Dribbles...

you're inability to not run away....plus you're a tattle tale...imagine that?...a grown man who runs and tells on people

Thought tattle tales grow up in 3rd or 4th grade?....not you tho

  no answer Cletus?

whay am I surprised   

And who did I tattle on?   

*31stArrival » 21 Jul 2025, 5:45 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2025, 5:45 am

What is the purpose to the game of chess regardless which dimensional interpretation being played between 2 or more people or AI bots? Psychological control of each brain over those playing the game. It creates typecasting a social order in 64 squared game board. with 32 pieces 18 pieces(16 pawns and 2 kings) can only move one space at a time. 4 knights can only move 2 spaces(one straight and one diagonal). 4 rooks can only move in straight perpendicular lines, 4 bishops in diagonal directions on the color. 2 queens that can go in any direction.

Trains brains to only follow linear equations outside equally living proportionately inhabiting space spontaneously separated simultaneously alive.

So we can safely describe you as anti-chess, then?

I only scored in the 98th percentile on my GED in the subject of interpreting reading materials. I might need assistance in sussing your meaning. 
 

Mrkelly » 21 Jul 2025, 6:52 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2025, 6:52 am

  no answer Cletus?

whay am I surprised   

And who did I tattle on? 

Dribbles can't remember who he tattles on...must be too many to remember

Dribbles avatar is correct....a guy running away

Cannonpointer » 21 Jul 2025, 12:23 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2025, 12:23 am

His primary focus is Asia. But the **** in Coupkraine plays into the coming war in Asia, so he keeps an eye on that as well.

All he does is listen. He listens to the people who are calling the shots. 

He reads their papers, and he believes that they will enact the policies that they say they will enact. And he notices that those policy papers - not the various presidents and congress people - govern America's politics on the world stage.

"This is our plan," those Rand Corporation and Heritage Foundation and Atlanitic Council papers say. "This is their plan," he then says to his readers and viewers - and then he then chronicles for his readers and viewers the unfolding of those published, publicly available action plans. 

When people ask me why I know what is going on - generally with an implied accusation that I don't know **** and I'm just making **** up, - guys like this are part of the answer. The other part is that my instincts are not atrophied as are those of 99% ofr Americans, most of whom have a cartoon understanding of their world and feet that never touch the ground. I actually listen to and honor my instincts, and I walk barefoot. And our instincts are tapped into universal truths - the same truths that guide a newborn colt to his mama's teat and a newborn turtle to the bosom of the sea. The same truths that are never going to excuse covering up for child rapists.

I am not naive. I understand better than most on this board that Trump HAS to squelch those tapes and that list. That is the table he is sitting at. That is the room he is in. But that's his **** problem. I didn't make him run his fat stupid mouth and promise the release of those files. And those of his true believers who make excuses for his failure to deliver on that promise are as full of **** as the leftards who screech against him for it. There are REASONS Trump does not release those tapes. There is no excuse for it. He is on the side of the baby rapers. He likes the cool kids' table.

If you were  handed the entire list of names as a prosecutor would you release every name on that list without being able to swear that you know for sure that every one on that list is guilty of having sex with a minor...?

I wouldn't.
If I was ordered to not prosecute  some VIP that I had solid proof was guilty..then I would resign.
 

nefarious101 » 21 Jul 2025, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2025, 9:17 am

Dribbles can't remember who he tattles on...must be too many to remember

Dribbles avatar is correct....a guy running away

  more “I got nuthin” from Cletus   

*GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Jul 2025, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2025, 9:32 am

If you were  handed the entire list of names as a prosecutor would you release every name on that list without being able to swear that you know for sure that every one on that list is guilty of having sex with a minor...?

1. I am not a prosecutor. What I would do if I WERE one is hypothetical.
2. No prosecutor is being handed the names by the AG. More importantly, NONE OF THE RAPISTS ARE BEING PROSECUTED - so your reference to prosecutors is a tad precious.
3. I did not make any promises to release the list. Trump did.
4. MAGA's demand that they "release the list" is not conditioned on what you imply. No one is saying, "We want EVERY name of EVERY potential defendant published on the front page right now; guardrails, good judgment, and rights be damned," as your question implies. What MAGA is requesting is an end to the Biden coverup which Trump promised and which your question abets through false "all or nothing" choices.

*GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Jul 2025, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2025, 9:32 am

I wouldn't.
If I was ordered to not prosecute  some VIP that I had solid proof was guilty..then I would resign.

Pam wouldn't resign.
Trump wouldn't resign.

Those are who you are defending - not yourself. YOUR integrity is not the issue - so why raiseit? What you might or might not do is irrelevant to the defense of people who manifestly would not do as you claim you would do.

And the integrity that you imply with your claim that you would walk away from your income is put into doubt by the weakness of your defense of the ongoing coverup and protection of elite international pedophiles. It gives rise to this question:

If you would genuinely forego your own income out of principle in response to an order to give a bye to a rich baby raper, then why in the **** would you defend people who are giving a bye to rich baby rapers?

Puhleeeze - splain that, Lucy.
 

Cannonpointer » 21 Jul 2025, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2025, 9:52 am

1. I am not a prosecutor. What I would do if I WERE one is hypothetical.
2. No prosecutor is being handed the names by the AG. More importantly, NONE OF THE RAPISTS ARE BEING PROSECUTED - so your reference to prosecutors is a tad precious.
3. I did not make any promises to release the list. Trump did.
4. MAGA's demand that they "release the list" is not conditioned on what you imply. No one is saying, "We want EVERY name of EVERY potential defendant published on the front page right now; guardrails, good judgment, and rights be damned," as your question implies. What MAGA is requesting is an end to the Biden coverup which Trump promised and which your question abets through false "all or nothing" choices.

Pam wouldn't resign.
Trump wouldn't resign.

Those are who you are defending - not yourself. YOUR integrity is not the issue - so why raiseit? What you might or might not do is irrelevant to the defense of people who manifestly would not do as you claim you would do.

And the integrity that you imply with your claim that you would walk away from your income is put into doubt by the weakness of your defense of the ongoing coverup and protection of elite international pedophiles. It gives rise to this question:

If you would genuinely forego your own income out of principle in response to an order to give a bye to a rich baby raper, then why in the **** would you defend people who are giving a bye to rich baby rapers?

Puhleeeze - splain that, Lucy.

I think the honest answer to the question I asked you is YES you would release all of the names on the list whether you were absolutely sure they were all guilty or not.
That's the way Stalin, Idi Amin or Saddam Hussein would do it too.     
 
 

Cannonpointer » 21 Jul 2025, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2025, 8:13 am

So we can safely describe you as anti-chess, then?

I only scored in the 98th percentile on my GED in the subject of interpreting reading materials. I might need assistance in sussing your meaning. 
 

Chess corrupts the brains playing the game without their consent but by their soul desire to control time when equally alive in series parallel positions of ancestral lineages inhabiting space geographically here evolving one at a time, here, now since conceived to replace one's personal previous 4 generations of parenting couples that were 16 great great grandparents, that were 8 great grandparents, that were 4 grandparents, that were the mom and dad of your completed compounding chromosomes arrived your fertilized cell.

go back to reciting history and how chaos is specifically calibrated by rule of law playing both generation gaps and ancestral lineages against one another through power of suggestion life is more than adapting since concepted limited to equally adapting in space now.

Cannonpointer » 21 Jul 2025, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2025, 9:52 am

1. I am not a prosecutor. What I would do if I WERE one is hypothetical.
2. No prosecutor is being handed the names by the AG. More importantly, NONE OF THE RAPISTS ARE BEING PROSECUTED - so your reference to prosecutors is a tad precious.
3. I did not make any promises to release the list. Trump did.
4. MAGA's demand that they "release the list" is not conditioned on what you imply. No one is saying, "We want EVERY name of EVERY potential defendant published on the front page right now; guardrails, good judgment, and rights be damned," as your question implies. What MAGA is requesting is an end to the Biden coverup which Trump promised and which your question abets through false "all or nothing" choices.

Pam wouldn't resign.
Trump wouldn't resign.

Those are who you are defending - not yourself. YOUR integrity is not the issue - so why raiseit? What you might or might not do is irrelevant to the defense of people who manifestly would not do as you claim you would do.

And the integrity that you imply with your claim that you would walk away from your income is put into doubt by the weakness of your defense of the ongoing coverup and protection of elite international pedophiles. It gives rise to this question:

If you would genuinely forego your own income out of principle in response to an order to give a bye to a rich baby raper, then why in the **** would you defend people who are giving a bye to rich baby rapers?

Puhleeeze - splain that, Lucy.

So now you are avoiding "hypotheticals" as you demand from others to answer and address YOUR hypotheticals to them???

You really are one hypocritical sort of fellar.

*GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Jul 2025, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2025, 11:59 am

I think

All recent evidence shouts to the heavens that this is a filthy lie, sir.

*GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Jul 2025, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2025, 11:59 am

the honest answer

Your most recent answers have all defended the shielding of sex fiends from prosecution - even from public censure. How honest of an answer can we expect from the origin of that nastiness?

*GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Jul 2025, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2025, 11:59 am

to the question I asked you is YES you would release all of the names on the list whether you were absolutely sure they were all guilty or not.

Well, you are entitled to your opinion. So are polacks and nigras.

Now, do me a favor and resort to the hitler card.

*GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Jul 2025, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2025, 11:59 am

That's the way Stalin, Idi Amin or Saddam Hussein would do it too.   

Come on, man. Don't be a ******. You know you wanted to say hitler. You hadda google a list of bad guys cuz you din wanna keep it real...

Cannonpointer » 21 Jul 2025, 5:15 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2025, 5:15 pm

All recent evidence shouts to the heavens that this is a filthy lie, sir.

Your most recent answers have all defended the shielding of sex fiends from prosecution - even from public censure. How honest of an answer can we expect from the origin of that nastiness?

Well, you are entitled to your opinion. So are polacks and nigras.

Now, do me a favor and resort to the hitler card.

Come on, man. Don't be a ******. You know you wanted to say hitler. You hadda google a list of bad guys cuz you din wanna keep it real...

Actually my list of Bad Guys came from an old meme about things that Hillary has said in public that we need to do about the gap between The Haves and The Have Nots.
FOUND IT..!!
POP QUIZ...!!

1) "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."

A. Karl MarxB. Adolph HitlerC. Joseph StalinD. None of the above

2]"It's time for a new beginning, for an end to government of the few, by the few, and for the few and to replace it with shared responsibility for shared prosperity."

A. LeninB. MussoliniC. Idi AminD. None of the Above

3]"(We) ... can't just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people."

A. Nikita KhrushevB. Josef GoebbelsC. Boris YeltsinD. None of the above

4]"We have to build a political consensus and that requires people to give up a little bit of their own ... in order to create this common ground."

A. Mao Tse DungB. Hugo ChavezC. Kim Jong IlD None of the above

5]"I certainly think the free-market has failed."

A. Karl MarxB. LeninC. MolotovD. None of the above

6]"I think it's time to send a clear message to what has become the most profitable sector in (the) entire economy that they are being watched."

A. PinochetB. MilosevicC. Saddam HusseinD. None of the above

Answers
1) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/29/2004
(2) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 5/29/2007
(3) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007
(4) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007
(5) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007
(6) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 9/2/2005

Be afraid. Be very, very afraid and voteAnybody (woman) that would vote for her just because they think it's time for a female president has got to be out of their lunatic mind!  
 
 

*Beekeeper » 21 Jul 2025, 4:57 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2025, 4:57 pm

So now you are avoiding "hypotheticals" as you demand from others to answer and address YOUR hypotheticals to them???

You really are one hypocritical sort of fellar.

Silly girl, the world of a prosecutor is proscribed by a code of ethics with which I am unfamiliar, governed by a code of responsibilities with which I am entirely unfamiliar, and informed by a profound understanding of powerful legal strategies with which I am entirely unfamiliar. I literally lack the information to say what I would do if I were a prosecutor, the same as I cannot say what actions I might take as a nuclear engineer.

I honestly believe that you would be much smarter, if only you realized how stupid you are.