Polk Salad,RebelGator » 23 Jul 2025, 6:04 am » wrote: ↑ More than E.Jean Carroll......and you lapped that up like a thirsty dog.
Rubbing your nose in **** isn't an invitation.
Watch...
I’m disturbed, I’m depressed, I’m inadequate...I’ve got it all!
Blackvegetable » 23 Jul 2025, 6:14 am » wrote: ↑ Watch...
What evidence did E. Jean Carroll provide?
No....not just her words.
1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video.
orWhen a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?"Sampling error"
BREAKING: Tulsi Gabbard Releases ‘New Evidence’ Exposing Obama Administration’s Alleged Involvement in RussiagateBuffalo » 20 Jul 2025, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑
Saturday, Jul. 19, 2025Gov't doc proves Obama, Dems KNEW Russia had no impact on Trump's 1st election victory
Gabbard releases Daily Briefing from 2016 showing confirmation of facts, but that didn't prevent years-long conspiracy intended to undermine duly elected president
By Bob Unruh July 18, 2025
Remember all the "Russia collusion" claims just before President Trump took office in 2017? And after? The years of special investigations. Government officials making wild claims? Media sycophants echoing the claims? All of those claims about Trump's campaign colluding with Russia.
Evidence now shows that that conspiracy was triggered by Hillary Clinton's desire to distract American voters' attention away from her scandalous behavior in which she posted government secrets on an unsecure private computer server she set up, and worked with an "opposition research" team, some lawyers, and some foreigners on the plan.
But whatever "colluding" they had been trying to persuade the American public was going on, the top level of Democrats in America, from Barack Obama and Joe Biden on down, knew that the Russians did not impact Trump's victory.
It comes from a report marked "For the President" and dated Dec. 8, 2016, shortly after Trump's victory but before he took office.
That document, a Presidential Daily Brief, was declassified by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and had top intel agencies confirming,
"We assess that Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent U.S. election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure."
The report said at most the offenders "compromised an Illinois voter registration database and unsuccessfully attempted the same in other states."
Ok what evidence did she provide?
Barry is protected by presidential immunityBlackvegetable » 23 Jul 2025, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑ BREAKING: Tulsi Gabbard Releases ‘New Evidence’ Exposing Obama Administration’s Alleged Involvement in Russiagate
'New Evidence'
Love the quotation marks...
That....and Tulsi's lack of credibility.
Clearly, they thought their Magic Negro was invulnerable when they had the fake news media in their pocket!BuckNaked » 21 Jul 2025, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ Oh man Barry and team really **** up why did they leave a paper trail?
Which piece of "new evidence" did you find most convincing?Zeets2 » 23 Jul 2025, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑ Clearly, they thought their Magic Negro was invulnerable when they had the fake news media in their pocket!
Zeets2 » 23 Jul 2025, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑ Clearly, they thought their Magic Negro was invulnerable when they had the fake news media in their pocket!
This information was certainly enough to start the ball rolling on Obama's treason.Blackvegetable » 23 Jul 2025, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑ Which piece of "new evidence" did you find most convincing?
”This intelligence was weaponized,” Gabbard said. “It was used as a justification for endless smears, for sanctions from Congress, and for covert investigations.” She added: “When key internal assessments found that Russia ‘did not impact recent U.S. election results,’ those findings were suppressed.”Russiagate was a ploy to ‘screw Trump’ – CIA boss
READ MORE:
Russiagate was a ploy to ‘screw Trump’ – CIA boss
“For months before the 2016 election, the Intelligence Community maintained that Russia lacked both the intent and capability to hack U.S. elections,” Gabbard noted. “But once President Trump won, everything changed.”One document — a draft President’s Daily Brief dated December 8, 2016 — stated Russia “did not impact recent U.S. election results” through cyberattacks. The report, prepared by the CIA, NSA, FBI, DHS, and other agencies, found no evidence of voting interference.Yet Fox News reported on Friday that the document was pulled — “based on new guidance,” according to internal emails. Hours later, a high-level Situation Room meeting took place, attended by officials including DNI James Clapper, CIA Director John Brennan, National Security Adviser Susan Rice, FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, and Attorney General Loretta Lynch.According to declassified notes, attendees agreed to produce a new intelligence assessment at President Obama’s request. That report, released on January 6, 2017, claimed Russia had intervened in the election to help Donald Trump — directly contradicting earlier assessments.Gabbard claims the revised assessment leaned on the discredited Steele Dossier — compiled by a former British spy — while sidelining dissenting views within the intelligence apparatus. “This was not intelligence gathering,” Gabbard stated. “It was narrative building.”
Blackvegetable » 23 Jul 2025, 6:14 am » wrote: ↑ Watch...
What evidence did E. Jean Carroll provide?
Zeets2 » 23 Jul 2025, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑ This information was certainly enough to start the ball rolling on Obama's treason.
Breaks your heart to learn about your racist black hero being such a treasonous scumbag, doesn't it?
You're a **** idiot.RebelGator » 23 Jul 2025, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑ Listen....
She claimed Donald Trump was part of a rape train that she participated in during her non-barren years.....so, heresay evidence
So, nothing.Zeets2 » 23 Jul 2025, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑ This information was certainly enough to start the ball rolling on Obama's treason.
Breaks your heart to learn about your racist black hero being such a treasonous scumbag, doesn't it?
WRONG, asshole!:
So are you trying to claim that falsifying intelligence reports in order to detract and interfere with the election is an "official act" of the president?Presidential immunity in the United StatesThe President has no immunity for unofficial acts. The court made this decision after former President Trump claimed absolute immunity from being investigated for any crimes committed while in office
Frankly, knowing that there wouldn't be a single black Democrat who would EVER vote for the charge of treason on their Magic Negro idol, I'd be quite happy to see Comey, Brennen and Clapper charged with it for their actions, and then watch and see which of them are willing to throw Obama under the bus to avoid jail time or their execution for treason!Will Barrack Obama be Convicted of TreasonShadows of Treason: Unravelling the alleged Obama Era Conspiracy to Undermine a PresidencyDamien Duncan
Jul 22, 2025
In July 2025, DNI Tulsi Gabbard (formerly a Congresswoman) declassified a memo naming figures such as James Clapper, John Brennan, and James Comey, accusing them of conspiring to undermine Trump’s legitimacy. Based on that, supporters argue that if these allegations are substantiated by documentary evidence and witness testimony, they could meet the legal definition of a “treasonous conspiracy.” They have pledged to forward all materials to the Department of Justice for criminal referral, insisting that the DOJ possesses the evidence necessary to pursue charges.Further bolstering the prosecution argument is the claim that Obama personally instructed government officials to fabricate documentation later used in the Steele dossier and FISA applications. If a person “owing allegiance to the United States” actively orchestrated false intelligence to ensnare a political rival, proponents argue this could constitute giving “aid and comfort” to foreign adversaries, namely Russia, by sowing discord in American democracy.