Are these your words?*Huey » 25 Jul 2025, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑ THis isn't about yi and your lack of knowledge of the law.
It is about investigating Obama which you are afraid of.
Start a thread and I will tear your personal alleged knowledge of the law to pieces, Pepper Spray.
Cowardly ****** idiot.Since neither of us is a lawyer or has a law degree we let the committees and DOJ figure it out. Don't be a coward, ******.
That is why an investigation is needed. You fear it. And have no consistency.Blackvegetable » 25 Jul 2025, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑That it is new is both your claim and premise.*Huey » 25 Jul 2025, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑
Do your own work. No need to divert with your source ****. You ain't **** in any context!
**** idiot.
That is not on topic. You know whose words they are, coward.Blackvegetable » 25 Jul 2025, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑Are these your words?*Huey » 25 Jul 2025, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑ THis isn't about yi and your lack of knowledge of the law.
It is about investigating Obama which you are afraid of.
Start a thread and I will tear your personal alleged knowledge of the law to pieces, Pepper Spray.Cowardly ****** idiot.Since neither of us is a lawyer or has a law degree we let the committees and DOJ figure it out. Don't be a coward, ******.
Because you have been made to believe that it is new?
Why post them?*Huey » 25 Jul 2025, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑
That is not on topic. You know whose words they are, coward.
murdock » 25 Jul 2025, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑ You media fed imbeciles have no idea how **** stupid you are.

Askholio asset another question. What a ******.Blackvegetable » 25 Jul 2025, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑Because you have been made to believe that it is new?
And another. My job here is done.Blackvegetable » 25 Jul 2025, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑Why post them?*Huey » 25 Jul 2025, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑
That is not on topic. You know whose words they are, coward.
You lied.*Huey » 25 Jul 2025, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑ Askholio asset another question. What a ******.
And another. My job here is done.
*Huey » 25 Jul 2025, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑ I did not lie when I said Obama merits an investigation.
I di not lie when I said your narrative for almost 8 years on this forum is Trump coordinated with the Russians for the 2016 election.
I did not lie when I said you fear an investigation.
You also said that voter fraud claims, already dismissed by Grifty's DoJ, merited further investigation.I did not lie when I said Obama merits an investigation.
It is not my narrative.I di not lie when I said your narrative for almost 8 years on this forum is Trump coordinated with the Russians for the 2016 election
You certainly did.I did not lie when I said you fear an investigation.
Blackvegetable » 25 Jul 2025, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑ You also said that voter fraud claims, already dismissed by Grifty's DoJ, merited further investigation.(already covered)
You insisted Jan 6th DIDN'T merit investigation.(not on topic)
You're an idiot.
It is not my narrative.(bs)
It is the Record. (lmao)
You certainly did.(nope)
But you are, as demonstrated, an idiot.*Huey » 25 Jul 2025, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑ Yawn.
Note the red is my replies.
Since you fear an investigation into the actions of in Obama my work is done here.
You call them how you interpret life beyond adapting in your own skin one heartbeat at a time equally alive, daily here pretending to be more than all you have been since a fertilized cell evolving in plain sight.
I just want to be very clear for the record. Not once did I say the information released by Tulsi is genuine. My position is, as stated earlier, it warrants investigation.Blackvegetable » 25 Jul 2025, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑But you are, as demonstrated, an idiot.*Huey » 25 Jul 2025, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑ Yawn.
Note the red is my replies.
Since you fear an investigation into the actions of in Obama my work is done here.
You've demonstrated nothing, except credulity and a predictable lack of integrity.
Blackvegetable » 25 Jul 2025, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑![]()
It's about a piece of yarn to distract you from Epstein.
Do you honestly believe anyone needed to be prompted to arrive at such an obvious conclusion?*Huey » 25 Jul 2025, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑ And here is where that talking point excuse came from:
https://www.thedailybeast.com/obama-bla ... m-epstein/
Your mom's ****** amplifies it.
Like I said.....

What justifies an investigation?*Huey » 25 Jul 2025, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑ I just want to be very clear for the record. Not once did I say the information released by Tulsi is genuine. My position is, as stated earlier, it warrants investigation.
Well, okay.*Beekeeper » 25 Jul 2025, 5:37 am » wrote: ↑ Neither does YOUR opinion and insults define me either.
But they are good for a decent belly laugh.