Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Yep, that 'ol Obama fellar is sure lookin' like he's going to see PRISON in his future!!
Yep, that 'ol Obama fellar is sure lookin' like he's going to see PRISON in his future!!
By *Beekeeper
23 Jul 2025 2:07 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
25 Jul 2025 4:05 pm
//////////We can say, without any hesitation, that the Committee found absolutely no evidence that then-candidate Donald Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russian government to meddle in the 2016 election.”Rubio also added, “What the Committee did find however is very troubling. We found irrefutable evidence of Russian meddling.”“Let there be no doubt, the Russians did meddle, and they continue to meddle, along with Iran and China,”///////////////////////*Beekeeper » 25 Jul 2025, 3:58 pm » wrote: ↑ But, but, but....
https://x.com/mtaibbi/status/1948512612 ... r-n2660941
You might want to READ something other than your handlers attempts to cover their OWN INCOMPETENT REPORTING back in 2016-2020.
100% of your claim is a LIE!! A big lie. YOU don't get to gaslight anyone with ZERO facts to support your BS. There are NO CLAIMS that the released documents say a word about "Russians changing votes", but quite the opposite in that the IC said they were INCAPABLE of doing that and none where changed. AND no one on the Trump team is making such a claim that "votes where changed" either.
Please, try harder to be relevant and STOP YOUR GASLIGHTING in some vain effort to "prove I'm right" when you have NOTHING to begin with.
25 Jul 2025 4:09 pm
I never said a word about votes being changed.*Beekeeper » 25 Jul 2025, 3:58 pm » wrote: ↑ But, but, but....
100% of your claim is a LIE!! A big lie. YOU don't get to gaslight anyone with ZERO facts to support your BS. There are NO CLAIMS that the released documents say a word about "Russians changing votes", but quite the opposite in that the IC said they were INCAPABLE of doing that and none where changed. AND no one on the Trump team is making such a claim that "votes where changed" either.
Please, try harder to be relevant and STOP YOUR GASLIGHTING in some vain effort to "prove I'm right" when you have NOTHING to begin with.
25 Jul 2025 4:15 pm
Mrkelly » 25 Jul 2025, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑ So
You don’t think that he will go to prison either?
Welcome back
this is just to divert from epstein
imo trump put her up to it.
if she gets sued so be it.
25 Jul 2025 6:13 pm
for what?
25 Jul 2025 6:15 pm
25 Jul 2025 8:15 pm
So what if Russia preferred trump? They don't have a right and a duty to have a horse in a race as important as who will be in the whitehouse?jerrab » 25 Jul 2025, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Gabbard insisted the Russian goal in 2016 was to sow distrust in American democracy — not to help Trump, a key judgment of the 2017 assessment that Republicans have long challenged.But her claims that the Obama administration “manufactured” the assessment are not supported by the newly redacted House report — or CIA Director John Ratcliffe’s own review of the intelligence assessment, which he released earlier this month.Ratcliffe’s review argued the assessment that Russian President Vladimir Putin “aspired” to help Trump win the 2016 election should not have been a so-called high confidence judgment, which indicates the intelligence community’s level of certainty, and it took issue with some of the analytic procedures underpinning the assessment. But Ratcliffe’s review found that “the overall assessment was deemed defensible.”The House report — which involved intelligence so sensitive it was kept in a so-called “turducken,” or a safe within a safe, at CIA headquarters — took a similar stance on the key judgment that Russia sought to help Trump, arguing that the assessment made analytical leaps based on relatively thin sourcing and failed to weigh contradictory intelligence highly enough, but neither argued that it was “manufactured.”Still, the release of the House Intelligence Committee review, led by former Rep. Devin Nunes when now-FBI Director Kash Patel was a top aide, was a long-sought victory for Trump — in large part because it pushes back against a similar review conducted by the GOP-led Senate Intelligence Committee in 2020, which found the intelligence supported the conclusions that Putin interfered to help Trump and there were no “significant tradecraft issues” in the preparation of the assessment.Gabbard’s decision to publicize the report when multiple predecessors had declined to do so, including Ratcliffe during Trump’s first term, comes at a moment when her standing within the Trump administration had been in question. In June, Trump publicly undermined Gabbard’s assessment on Iran’s nuclear capabilities and she was absent from at least one major national security meeting to discuss Israel and Iran. CNN reported at the time that the president viewed her as “off-message.”Former Obama Director of National Intelligence James Clapper dismissed Gabbard’s allegations on Wednesday, calling them “patently false and unfounded” on CNN’s ‘The Source.’Referring to the House Republican report, he said, “I can attest to the inaccuracies in that report on things they said about me, which were wrong or false.”
Does the charge that trump colluded with russia hinge on some bureaucrat's belief of Putin's preference?
If putin had preferred hitlery, the left would have said, yeah because he doesn't want a crazy person in the oval. They would not have claimed it meant that hitlery colluded - which she did, and I can prove it, once I find the key to my **** turducken.
And what possible right does the US have toask ANY nation on earth not tomeddle in our elections? The **** gall of that...
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
25 Jul 2025 8:36 pm
did obama say trump was part of russias interference or that russia changed the votes.Cannonpointer » 25 Jul 2025, 8:15 pm » wrote: ↑ So what if Russia preferred trump? They don't have a right and a duty to have a horse in a race as important as who will be in the whitehouse?
Does the charge that trump colluded with russia hinge on some bureaucrat's belief of Putin's preference?
If putin had preferred hitlery, the left would have said, yeah because he doesn't want a crazy person in the oval. They would not have claimed it meant that hitlery colluded - which she did, and I can prove it, once I find the key to my **** turducken.
And what possible right does the US have toask ANY nation on earth not tomeddle in our elections? The **** gall of that...
25 Jul 2025 8:42 pm
-------------------------------------------------------------------
abbard insisted the Russian goal in 2016 was to sow distrust in American democracy — not to help Trump, a key judgment of the 2017 assessment that Republicans have long challenged.But her claims that the Obama administration “manufactured” the assessment are not supported by the newly redacted House report — or CIA Director John Ratcliffe’s own review of the intelligence assessment, which he released earlier this month.
abbard insisted the Russian goal in 2016 was to sow distrust in American democracy — not to help Trump, a key judgment of the 2017 assessment that Republicans have long challenged.But her claims that the Obama administration “manufactured” the assessment are not supported by the newly redacted House report — or CIA Director John Ratcliffe’s own review of the intelligence assessment, which he released earlier this month.
25 Jul 2025 9:58 pm
His subordinates did. Are you suggesting something racist, here? Is your kkk showing?jerrab » 25 Jul 2025, 8:36 pm » wrote: ↑ did obama say trump was part of russias interference or that russia changed the votes.
You think Obama is too stupid to be accountable for what his underlings do - he's just a shucking and jiving pickaninny that they flim-flammed? Is that your thesis?
There's no place on THIS board for that kind of racism. The man was a PRESIDENT, you **** racist!
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
25 Jul 2025 11:03 pm
------------------------------Cannonpointer » 25 Jul 2025, 9:58 pm » wrote: ↑ His subordinates did. Are you suggesting something racist, here? Is your kkk showing?
You think Obama is too stupid to be accountable for what his underlings do - he's just a shucking and jiving pickaninny that they flim-flammed? Is that your thesis?
There's no place on THIS board for that kind of racism. The man was a PRESIDENT, you **** racist!
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump- ... rcna220730
Broadly, the former Obama aides unequivocally say that there is zero merit to the allegations and that they do not believe they will lead anywhere. They point to a 2020 Senate investigation, which endorsed intelligence agencies’ assessment that Russia had spread disinformation online and leaked stolen emails from the Democratic National Committee to undermine Hillary Clinton’s 2016 candidacy and help Trump. Trump-appointed Secretary of State Marco Rubio was the acting chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee at the time, which endorsed the findings.“There is no factual basis for the allegations that Tulsi Gabbard is making. She’s cherry-picking things from various documents that are out of context and mischaracterized,” Brennan said.
25 Jul 2025 11:12 pm
25 Jul 2025 11:14 pm
gabbard is who is racist.Cannonpointer » 25 Jul 2025, 9:58 pm » wrote: ↑ His subordinates did. Are you suggesting something racist, here? Is your kkk showing?
You think Obama is too stupid to be accountable for what his underlings do - he's just a shucking and jiving pickaninny that they flim-flammed? Is that your thesis?
There's no place on THIS board for that kind of racism. The man was a PRESIDENT, you **** racist!
25 Jul 2025 11:21 pm
Broadly, you need better **** copy pastes. That twaddle is absolute horse ****. Trump's alleged collusion with Russia was the talk of the country for several years. Arguments raged whether Mueller's report "cleared" Trump of Russian Colllusion, or merely did not find ENOUGH proof to impeach. The AP, Politico -all of the fact checking agencies insisted it was the latter, while Trump's team viewed it as the former.jerrab » 25 Jul 2025, 11:03 pm » wrote: ↑ ------------------------------
Broadly, the former Obama aides unequivocally say that there is zero merit to the allegations and that they do not believe they will lead anywhere. They point to a 2020 Senate investigation, which endorsed intelligence agencies’ assessment that Russia had spread disinformation online and leaked stolen emails from the Democratic National Committee to undermine Hillary Clinton’s 2016 candidacy and help Trump. Trump-appointed Secretary of State Marco Rubio was the acting chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee at the time, which endorsed the findings.“There is no factual basis for the allegations that Tulsi Gabbard is making. She’s cherry-picking things from various documents that are out of context and mischaracterized,” Brennan said.
That pure **** you just aborted onto the board would have us believe the allegation that Trump colluded with Putin - which the country spent millions investigating - was made by no one, so a special counsel was funded to get to the bottom of the charges that were made by no one.
As to these "leaked emails" that were leaked by "Russia," I believe your copy paste is erroneously referring to the emails that SNOWDEN leaked - not Russia.
The fact that the US was going to murder Snowden and Russia gave him safe harbor does not mean that RUSSIA "stole" the emails. For that matter, it's hard to say Snowden "stole" what was so generously offered up by a retarded sow. Hitlery was easier to "hack" (if we can even call it that) than a ten year old, because she broke the **** law and did not follow security procedures.. Blaming Putin for that stupid old rancid **** is rude.
I despise rudeness.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
25 Jul 2025 11:24 pm
She's some kind of mongrel. She CAN'T be racist. Only white people can be racist.
Mongrels lack the power that white folks in trailer parks have.
Are you SURE you're a democrat? You don't seem to know the rules.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
25 Jul 2025 11:34 pm
Mueller Investigation (2017-2019):Cannonpointer » 25 Jul 2025, 11:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Broadly, you need better **** copy pastes. That twaddle is absolute horse ****. Trump's alleged collusion with Russia was the talk of the country for several years. Arguments raged whether Mueller's report "cleared" Trump of Russian Colllusion, or merely did not find ENOUGH proof to impeach. The AP, Politico -all of the fact checking agencies insisted it was the latter, while Trump's team viewed it as the former.
That pure **** you just aborted onto the board would have us believe the allegation that Trump colluded with Putin - which the country spent millions investigating - was made by no one, so a special counsel was funded to get to the bottom of the charges that were made by no one.
As to these "leaked emails" that were leaked by "Russia," I believe your copy paste is erroneously referring to the emails that SNOWDEN leaked - not Russia.
The fact that the US was going to murder Snowden and Russia gave him safe harbor does not mean that RUSSIA "stole" the emails. For that matter, it's hard to say Snowden "stole" what was so generously offered up by a retarded sow. Hitlery was easier to "hack" (if we can even call it that) than a ten year old, because she broke the **** law and did not follow security procedures.. Blaming Putin for that stupid old rancid **** is rude.
I despise rudeness.
.
Robert Mueller was appointed to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, including potential collusion with the Trump campaign////
obama was not president in 2017
25 Jul 2025 11:40 pm
she is whiteCannonpointer » 25 Jul 2025, 11:24 pm » wrote: ↑ She's some kind of mongrel. She CAN'T be racist. Only white people can be racist.
Mongrels lack the power that white folks in trailer parks have.
Are you SURE you're a democrat? You don't seem to know the rules.
25 Jul 2025 11:49 pm
Google is your friend.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
25 Jul 2025 11:52 pm
Did I say that Obama was president when Mueller was appointed to investigate the claims his administration had made?jerrab » 25 Jul 2025, 11:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Mueller Investigation (2017-2019):
.
Robert Mueller was appointed to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, including potential collusion with the Trump campaign////
obama was not president in 2017
No, I didn't.
Did you duck the issue by pointing to an obvious but irrelevant fact?
Yes, you did.
Tell me. Did TRUMP make the claim that he colluded with Russia? I guess he MUST have, since Obama wasn't president in 2017 - right?
That WAS your thesis - if you had one, - was it not? That Trump accused Trump? Just say it,
If I buy YOUR ****, It's Trump by process of elimination. I mean, no one ELSE did it - right?
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
26 Jul 2025 12:06 am
who appointed Mueller?Cannonpointer » 25 Jul 2025, 11:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Did I say that Obama was president when Mueller was appointed to investigate the claims his administration had made?
No, I didn't.
Did you duck the issue by pointing to an obvious but irrelevant fact?
Yes, you did.
Tell me. Did TRUMP make the claim that he colluded with Russia? I guess he MUST have, since Obama wasn't president in 2017 - right?
That WAS your thesis - if you had one, - was it not? That Trump accused Trump? Just say it,
If I buy YOUR ****, It's Trump by process of elimination. I mean, no one ELSE did it - right?
26 Jul 2025 4:17 am
It would be great if you were burned alive in a horrible accident.
Who is online
In total there are 4153 users online :: 11 registered, 14 bots, and 4128 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, RebelGator, jerra b, LowIQTrash, PhiloBeddo, SouthernFried, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101
Bots: Firefox/7.0, Not, CriteoBot, ADmantX, DuckDuckBot, proximic, YandexBot, Bolt, facebookexternalhit, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, curl/7, Applebot, bingbot