I always answer
Who holds the record for monthly budget surpluses?
Slick Willy?
Can you make a reply button like this that we can click to save time replying to that moron?
Clinton owes it all to Reagan. Reagan signed the tech sector tax breaks for R&D. The tech profits in the 90s (thanx to Reagan) were like Manna from Heaven.
Link?roadkill » 24 Jul 2025, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Clinton owes it all to Reagan. Reagan signed the tech sector tax breaks for R&D. The tech profits in the 90s (thanx to Reagan) were like Manna from Heaven.
Bv's girlfriend got her personality-software thanx to Reagan's tax breaks.
I see you are demanding answers while evading questions again. How unlike you.
orWhen a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?"Sampling error"
lolVegas » 24 Jul 2025, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑ I see you are demanding answers while evading questions again. How unlike you.
1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video.
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me
Either A, B, C, or D.
Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.
or
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Editor-in-chief of The Federalist, Stupid.
Never seen any of you clowns copping to reading it...
I don't, but I know who she is.Blackvegetable » 24 Jul 2025, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Never seen any of you clowns copping to reading it...
I already said slick Willyroadkill » 24 Jul 2025, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Clinton owes it all to Reagan. Reagan signed the tech sector tax breaks for R&D. The tech profits in the 90s (thanx to Reagan) were like Manna from Heaven.
Bv's girlfriend got her personality-software thanx to Reagan's tax breaks.
You want to admit how?
John f Kennedy?
Here's the thing.roadkill » 23 Jul 2025, 4:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Watch cp fall in love with this thread title...![]()
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJpyix4OYVQ
What else matters besides the truth over facts as plugs said?Cannonpointer » 24 Jul 2025, 5:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Here's the thing.
No one is going to jail.No one. Period. The lawyering up is thayatah.
Only one side believes a word of it - and they already did. So precisely zero people are enlightened by this. It's a throw-away scandal, A scandal that no one minds getting out there, as it leads to no change in any dynamic that matters. As a bonus, it's divisive, which serves the agenda of those who are committed to our being divided.
The intention of this hoopla is to take our eyes off of something that DOES matter.
Now, I can lay it out blood simple like that, such that a **** caveman can understand it. But I CANNOT make you smart.
I CANNOT stop you from biting that delicious worm, unmindful of that shiny steel hook.