Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 6:45 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 6:45 am

So **** g'ddammned stupid..

it's about you owning them, 43MilesShort&WideOpen

Yes, you are of **** damn stupid.

After 8 years you are still unable tell who posted what on the forum.  What a **** retard.  Not sure what your reference to 43 miles is.  Could you explain?

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 7:03 am

Who said I don't own them?  


 

Nope, they are not anymore 

Are these your words?

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 7:05 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 7:05 am

Yes, you are of **** damn stupid.

After 8 years you are still unable tell who posted what on the forum.  What a **** retard.  Not sure what your reference to 43 miles is.  Could you explain?

"Nope, they are not anymore."

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 6:56 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 6:56 am

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 6:50 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 6:50 am

I post however the **** I want  Retard.  Particularly when you are lying.  Lawyer wannabe (not smart enough for law school) 
Your antics would not stand upon in a court of law.

I am not denying my words, Retard.  I am denying your description of my words, retard.  No ****, in the post in you are really referring towards I had forgotten ONE thread posted 4 years ago.  A mistake which I explain in the same to hread you are screening shotting one comment.  You ies by claiming I lied.

Keep trying Salem Sally.  I **** ng own you.  A real man (even yo low rent daddy knew you weren’t) would post with a link.  But you ha be lies to tell.

THIS IS NOT A MELTDOWN!

 

Not at all Salem Sally.  Stop acting like a Karen.

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 7:03 am

Who said I don't own them?  

Your problem, Retard, is you like to play like this is a courtroom and you are lawyer questioning a one on the witness stand.  You are full of delusions of grandeur, being pompous and trying to steer the individual in the direction you want, which from PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE I understand.  Now in the court of law there is a thing called cross examination.  This is where 9 times out of 10 your case would fall apart.

But, you are a ****** who skips that part and runs after you are done.  

Now, we know they are my words.

My question is:
What was said after that?  You won't answer because you are a ******.

You are full of delusions of grandeur, being pompous and trying to steer the individual in the direction you want, which from PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE I understand.  

:rofl:  

Now in the court of law there is a thing called cross examination.  This is where 9 times out of 10 your case would fall apart.

Where cases are "made" WITHOUT questions?

 

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 7:10 am

Not at all Salem Sally.  Stop acting like a Karen.

Words don't mean what you think they mean.

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 6:50 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 6:50 am

I post however the **** I want  Retard.  Particularly when you are lying.  Lawyer wannabe (not smart enough for law school) 
Your antics would not stand upon in a court of law.

I am not denying my words, Retard.  I am denying your description of my words, retard.  

Particularly when you are lying.  Lawyer wannabe (not smart enough for law school) Your antics would not stand upon in a court of law.

Explain how you would possibly know..

I am not denying my words, Retard.  I am denying your description of my words, retard.  

The ones I'm "describing" with screenshots of the posts in question?
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 7:08 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 7:08 am

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 7:05 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 7:05 am

Yes, you are of **** damn stupid.

After 8 years you are still unable tell who posted what on the forum.  What a **** retard.  Not sure what your reference to 43 miles is.  Could you explain?

"Nope, they are not anymore."

 

No, they are not.  Can link to it?  Come on.  Retard, why are you afraid to link to them, Beach ******?

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 7:11 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 7:11 am

 

Where cases are "made" WITHOUT questions?

Nope, not solely, Backwoods Perry.  Cases are made thru investigations, questioning, and evidence.  And in court questioning is subject to cross examination.

You are lacking in most of that.  You provide no evidence and refuse to to take in a cross.  

 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 7:12 am

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 7:10 am

Not at all Salem Sally.  Stop acting like a Karen.

Words don't mean what you think they mean.

 

Usually those who are lying are hiding **** use that line.  Damn dude, I am almost 60 and have investigated, questioned and presented a helluva lot evidence and cases than you ever had.  You think I never heard that before from a dirtball?

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 7:15 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 7:15 am

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 6:50 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 6:50 am

I post however the **** I want  Retard.  Particularly when you are lying.  Lawyer wannabe (not smart enough for law school) 
Your antics would not stand upon in a court of law.

I am not denying my words, Retard.  I am denying your description of my words, retard.  

Particularly when you are lying.  Lawyer wannabe (not smart enough for law school) Your antics would not stand upon in a court of law.

Explain how you would possibly know..

I am not denying my words, Retard.  I am denying your description of my words, retard.  

The ones I'm "describing" with screenshots of the posts in question?
 

 

Explain how you would possibly know..

Since you simply refuse to answer questions or provide links (evidence) I am under NO OBLIGATION to repeat the answer to that again.

The ones I'm "describing" with screenshots of the posts in question?

Provide links and let's see how your case goes.  This is your case.  If you need me to tell you what your case is you are a **** retard.
 

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 7:22 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 7:22 am

Since you simply refuse to answer questions or provide links (evidence) I am under NO OBLIGATION to repeat the answer to that again.

Provide links and let's see how your case goes.  This is your case.  If you need me to tell you what your case is you are a **** retard.

Since you simply refuse to answer questions

I refuse to do so as a condition for you to welsh.

or provide links

Linked posts can be changed - as demonstrated....you cannot edit your words captured on a screenshot.

(evidence) 

Are photographs inadmissible as evidence?

 

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 7:19 am

Usually those who are lying are hiding **** use that line.  

Yea....they're yours...


:rofl:  

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 7:49 am

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 7:22 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 7:22 am

Since you simply refuse to answer questions or provide links (evidence) I am under NO OBLIGATION to repeat the answer to that again.

Provide links and let's see how your case goes.  This is your case.  If you need me to tell you what your case is you are a **** retard.

Since you simply refuse to answer questions

I refuse to do so as a condition for you to welsh.

or provide links

Linked posts can be changed - as demonstrated....you cannot edit your words captured on a screenshot.

(evidence) 

Are photographs inadmissible as evidence?

 

 

2 things.

1. When you edit a post the date of the edit is time stamped on the post.  So if I went back and edited it today that would be a clear indication that it was edited because of your screen shot.  You are not smart enough to play this game.

2.  I guarantee you that the screen shot discussing using PG on a tribute thread has not been edited.  I found it relatively quickly.  So, post the link,

3.  The other screen shot you love to post but refuse to answer questions about is about the "obvious">. That was edited with days of making the comment.  So no, those words are not mine.  

You lose Back Woods Perry Mason.

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 7:17 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 7:17 am

Nope, not solely, Backwoods Perry.  Cases are made thru investigations, questioning, and evidence.  And in court questioning is subject to cross examination.

You are lacking in most of that.  You provide no evidence and refuse to to take in a cross.

Testimony is subject to cross examination, Tiny.

And shrieking "No questions!", or insisting the cross examening attorney first answer your questions,  or make a case, would never fly...
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 7:59 am

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 7:17 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 7:17 am

Nope, not solely, Backwoods Perry.  Cases are made thru investigations, questioning, and evidence.  And in court questioning is subject to cross examination.

You are lacking in most of that.  You provide no evidence and refuse to to take in a cross.

Testimony is subject to cross examination, Tiny.

And shrieking "No questions!", or insisting the cross examening attorney first answer your questions,  or make a case, would never fly...
 

 

You are just solidify the case you are a ****** who runs from questions.  I highly recommend if you are going to refuse to answer questions that you stick to make statements only, that are backed up by facts and links.  If you can't 

No questions, Beach ******.  If you cannot defend your posts or your questions by answering counter questions you a **** ****** worthy of being evaced from the beach.

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 7:56 am

2 things.


 

No...just one..

The answer.

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 8:03 am

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 7:56 am

2 things.

1. When you edit a post the date of the edit is time stamped on the post.  So if I went back and edited it today that would be a clear indication that it was edited because of your screen shot.  You are not smart enough to play this game.

2.  I guarantee you that the screen shot discussing using PG on a tribute thread has not been edited.  I found it relatively quickly.  So, post the link,

3.  The other screen shot you love to post but refuse to answer questions about is about the "obvious">. That was edited with days of making the comment.  So no, those words are not mine.  

You lose Back Woods Perry Mason.

 

No...just one..

The answer.

 

Try again Sally.  Your question was answered, Beach ******.  And you have already established the fact you refuse to answer questions.  Go pound sound while waiting tube evaced off the beach.
 

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 8:06 am

Try again Sally.

Try not running.
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 8:07 am

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 8:06 am

Try again Sally.  Your question was answered, Beach ******.  And you have already established the fact you refuse to answer questions.  Go pound sound while waiting tube evaced off the beach.

 

Try not running.
 

 

Post the question you claim I didnotanswer anthem I will once again show you are liar.  So, who is running now, Bitch?