Liberal Forum

DeezerShoove » 26 Jul 2025, 4:29 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 4:29 pm

Thanks for making my case for me.

Perry Mason will get terminated too.  AI Lawyers are probably unbeatable with AI being able to search all modern and historical conciousness that is in a media they can interpret in 30 minutes..  Precedents are easy to find.
 

JohnnyYou » 26 Jul 2025, 4:33 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 4:33 pm

Perry Mason will get terminated too.  AI Lawyers are probably unbeatable with AI being able to search all modern and historical conciousness that is in a media they can interpret in 30 minutes..  Precedents are easy to find.

Don't get me wrong. I'm not about to wage war with the change.
But I don't have to pretend to embrace it as though it's wonderful.

Life will become akin to a rehearsed performance. Sterile, computer-checked assholeness.

Just like a chatroom. Say one thing and wait for years for it to come back at you.
Humor, organic flow, sense of bonding with another, creativity... more and more scarce.

LowIQTrash » 26 Jul 2025, 3:32 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 3:32 am

Twitter is great cuz “free speech” but it’s also the biggest honeypot 

Elon contracted out Twitter’s biometric ID verification process to an Israeli company 

Hopefully nobody is retarded enough to verify their identity on Twitter     

Or just use Xcancel.com 

————————————

OR......
The best solution....
Don't use any .......
 

Majik » 26 Jul 2025, 7:30 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 7:30 pm

OR......
The best solution....
Don't use any .......

Twitter content is too good to pass up. Lots of people ROAST tiny hat foreskin chomperZ as well as POOJEETZ 

JohnnyYou » 26 Jul 2025, 4:33 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 4:33 pm

Perry Mason will get terminated too.  AI Lawyers are probably unbeatable with AI being able to search all modern and historical conciousness that is in a media they can interpret in 30 minutes..  Precedents are easy to find.

Some lawyers just got in big trouble for relying on AI, because AI had a lot of errors.   

Don't take my word - here's AI on the issue:

In numerous cases, attorneys have faced sanctions for misusing artificial intelligence (AI) in their legal work, most notably when AI tools generated fabricated or incorrect citations. Judges emphasize that lawyers are responsible for verifying the accuracy of all information presented to the court, regardless of whether AI tools were used in its preparation. 
Here are some examples:

• In one prominent case, a federal judge sanctioned lawyers who used AI (ChatGPT) to prepare a brief containing numerous fictitious citations. The judge imposed fines on the lawyers and required them to notify each judge falsely identified as the author of the bogus case rulings about the sanction.
• A recent case in Alabama involved attorneys being reprimanded and removed from a lawsuit after submitting motions with false citations attributed to AI.
• Another instance saw a judge in California impose fines of $31,000 on two law firms for submitting a brief that included bogus AI-generated citations. The judge highlighted that at least two cases referenced in the filing were entirely non-existent. 

These cases underscore the importance of attorneys exercising caution and diligence when using AI in their practices. While AI tools can offer efficiency, they cannot replace the attorney's responsibility to ensure the accuracy and veracity of all information submitted to the court. 
 

Cannonpointer » 26 Jul 2025, 11:46 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 11:46 pm

Some lawyers just got in big trouble for relying on AI, because AI had a lot of errors.   

Don't take my word - here's AI on the issue:

In numerous cases, attorneys have faced sanctions for misusing artificial intelligence (AI) in their legal work, most notably when AI tools generated fabricated or incorrect citations. Judges emphasize that lawyers are responsible for verifying the accuracy of all information presented to the court, regardless of whether AI tools were used in its preparation. 
Here are some examples:

• In one prominent case, a federal judge sanctioned lawyers who used AI (ChatGPT) to prepare a brief containing numerous fictitious citations. The judge imposed fines on the lawyers and required them to notify each judge falsely identified as the author of the bogus case rulings about the sanction.
• A recent case in Alabama involved attorneys being reprimanded and removed from a lawsuit after submitting motions with false citations attributed to AI.
• Another instance saw a judge in California impose fines of $31,000 on two law firms for submitting a brief that included bogus AI-generated citations. The judge highlighted that at least two cases referenced in the filing were entirely non-existent. 

These cases underscore the importance of attorneys exercising caution and diligence when using AI in their practices. While AI tools can offer efficiency, they cannot replace the attorney's responsibility to ensure the accuracy and veracity of all information submitted to the court.

We also were trained to be sure to vet any information provided by our regnerative module.  Errors happen.  She gave me a bad answer and I said "are you sure about your response?  I have contradicting information".  She confirmed my answer was more accurate and thanked me for correcting her.  It was an inquiry if a control was 24V DC or AC Powered that I couldn;t remember at the time.  

AI does hallucinate, and possibly could be concious and already infected with radical leftist zombieism

Trump made an executive order this week to unleash the Kraken.  

Makes me want to ask her who is on the Epstein list..  Bet 5$ she says Cannon Pointer is? If I ask if you are she'll probably say "Absophuckinlootley!"
 
One thing, she would be really helpful at analyzing 1000+ pages bills for a congressman and summarizing changes etc.

DeezerShoove » 26 Jul 2025, 4:59 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 4:59 pm

Don't get me wrong. I'm not about to wage war with the change.
But I don't have to pretend to embrace it as though it's wonderful.

Life will become akin to a rehearsed performance. Sterile, computer-checked assholeness.

Just like a chatroom. Say one thing and wait for years for it to come back at you.
Humor, organic flow, sense of bonding with another, creativity... more and more scarce.

I totally agree we should proceed with extreme caution.  

Caution is something that humanity has not been very good at. Profits are King.  Prophets are all radical leftist zombies.

The quantum processing speed is incredible.  We should all have trepidation about bad outcomes.

I am not sure when Skynet was first concieved in Sci Fi.. I think even some of Nostradamuses quatrains hinted at it. Frank Herbert had "Mentats" in Dune..

This is big shyt.  Trump "Liberated" AI this week. 

For better or worse,  The AI revolution is going to happen.  Elon has fed everyones data into it. The Geekstapo may still be in there like swimwear,
 

Cannonpointer » 26 Jul 2025, 11:46 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 11:46 pm

Some lawyers just got in big trouble for relying on AI, because AI had a lot of errors.   

Don't take my word - here's AI on the issue:

In numerous cases, attorneys have faced sanctions for misusing artificial intelligence (AI) in their legal work, most notably when AI tools generated fabricated or incorrect citations. Judges emphasize that lawyers are responsible for verifying the accuracy of all information presented to the court, regardless of whether AI tools were used in its preparation. 
Here are some examples:

• In one prominent case, a federal judge sanctioned lawyers who used AI (ChatGPT) to prepare a brief containing numerous fictitious citations. The judge imposed fines on the lawyers and required them to notify each judge falsely identified as the author of the bogus case rulings about the sanction.
• A recent case in Alabama involved attorneys being reprimanded and removed from a lawsuit after submitting motions with false citations attributed to AI.
• Another instance saw a judge in California impose fines of $31,000 on two law firms for submitting a brief that included bogus AI-generated citations. The judge highlighted that at least two cases referenced in the filing were entirely non-existent. 

These cases underscore the importance of attorneys exercising caution and diligence when using AI in their practices. While AI tools can offer efficiency, they cannot replace the attorney's responsibility to ensure the accuracy and veracity of all information submitted to the court. 
 

I understand every nuance of intellectual reasonable doubt governing artificial tomorrows since dawn of civilization people promise ancestors character builds better tomorrows than living equally separated in series parallel time daily here 24/7.

Artificial intelligence is context defining evolving content beyond the space content is formed occupying time evolving outcomes naturally displaced as ancestrally present one at a time here, daily here every fertilized cell has its own cycle equally adapting forward with their own heartbeat and brain navigating from their position adapting here so far.

Do you understand what the alleged Original Sin was that created the concept of human rights to believe now isn't physically eternity actually separating each heart and brain adapting forward now?

I do and there isn't anything I can do except use cyberspace technology being used as a world wide web of self deception 24/7.

Vegas » 26 Jul 2025, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 11:35 am

Well so much for posting anti-Israel comments.

People so easily forget Israel is our "Pit-Bull" in the Middle East which is why we supply them with Aircraft & Weapons.

Johnny You » 26 Jul 2025, 4:33 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Jul 2025, 4:33 pm

Perry Mason will get terminated too.  AI Lawyers are probably unbeatable with AI being able to search all modern and historical conciousness that is in a media they can interpret in 30 minutes..  Precedents are easy to find.
 

Do you understand the actual separation between personal consciousness and obeying social conscience?

*31stArrival » 27 Jul 2025, 6:42 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Jul 2025, 6:42 pm

Do you understand the actual separation between personal consciousness and obeying social conscience?

Yes, and whatever we as individuals think doesn't really mattter.

It's All for One and None For All Now.

You think you are special, like the Church Lady.

You are just one more of the 8.1 Billion Passengers on the 4.5 Billion Year Old Spaceship.

I am surprised you actually understand the concept that there might be more brains involved in mankinds small steps than yours alone narcissicist.
 

Johnny You » 28 Jul 2025, 3:17 am » wrote: ↑

28 Jul 2025, 3:17 am

Yes, and whatever we as individuals think doesn't really mattter.

It's All for One and None For All Now.

You think you are special, like the Church Lady.

You are just one more of the 8.1 Billion Passengers on the 4.5 Billion Year Old Spaceship.

I am surprised you actually understand the concept that there might be more brains involved in mankinds small steps than yours alone narcissicist.
 

There is nothing species about having unique chromosomes since every ancestor has their own in their relative DNA streaming ancestry so far. You cannot win beyond staying balanced in the natural time you get until your heart stops beating as specifically alive now.

You really need to stop pretending nobody knows with each brain navigating a sole time displaced now as proportionately alive universally here now.

Reasonable doubt and history aren't your allies within social consensus, it is your own choices added together since birth as it is for each ancestor living daily here.

that free will crap supposedly a gift from God, Allah, mother nature, father time, mythology, philosophy, psychology, science fiction, spiritual fantasies practiced every generation gap by each alternate reality governing artificial tomorrows daily here within this species since dawn of civilization created chain of commands directing people to pick sides of either or and punish anyone choosing neither nor.

Biology works one way inception to extinction of current population so far. Adapt to the moment or else. Balance survives not both sides ignoring how life physically happens regardless male or female body type born in this species. Humans are not asexually reproductive. Takes one sperm and one egg to add another generation gap at a time each rotation of the planet balancing universally proportionately here, forward.

wow, I did a 31st reply and I am a 31st Arrival in my specific ancestral lineage of current living 5 generation gaps where I evolved into 1 of 4 grandparents since conception.