In the case of the Watusis' is obvious...when yer toes to toes, yer nose is in it and when yer nose to nose, yer toes is in it....Cannonpointer » 29 Jul 2025, 5:45 pm » wrote: ↑ You truly are anti-science. "Different genes" is the duh-no-**** part. It's the what. It ain't the WHY. It isn't an argument - it's a hiding place.
Here's the why:
The genes were made different through selective breeding. In the case of the pymies, tall people died without breeding and short people lived - and the shorter you were the more ****** you got. In the case of the Watusis, short people couldn't get ****** in a Zambian whore house with a goat to trade. Only the tall and athletic got to procreate.
Or, "evolution."
Now, if you got another WHY than that, I am - as Ross Perot said - "all ears."
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom When your science is developed to control outcomes of each incoming natural displacement by theory, theology, philosophy, psychology, artificial economic value promising 7 artificial tomorrows 365.2422 days a year, then there is a problem of certain persons are intentionally corrupting people all the time for their own glory of pretending life isn't self evident time existing by navigating space per heartbeat forward now.Cannonpointer » 29 Jul 2025, 5:45 pm » wrote: ↑ You truly are anti-science. "Different genes" is the duh-no-**** part. It's the what. It ain't the WHY. It isn't an argument - it's a hiding place.
Here's the why:
The genes were made different through selective breeding. In the case of the pymies, tall people died without breeding and short people lived - and the shorter you were the more ****** you got. In the case of the Watusis, short people couldn't get ****** in a Zambian whore house with a goat to trade. Only the tall and athletic got to procreate.
Or, "evolution."
Now, if you got another WHY than that, I am - as Ross Perot said - "all ears."
PhiloBeddo » 30 Jul 2025, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ Gaza is a terrorist breeding ground. Nuke it to oblivion. Palestinas are terrorists, **** em.
But you believe in the New Testament, right?jerrab » 28 Jul 2025, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑ it is in the old testament.
I don't believe the old testament was inspired/written by god.
it is in the old testament.
Again, I never argued for"macro-evolving" - or as peiople actually educated on the topic call it, "speciation."ROG62 » 30 Jul 2025, 12:10 am » wrote: ↑ In the case of the Watusis' is obvious...when yer toes to toes, yer nose is in it and when yer nose to nose, yer toes is in it....
Now show me one case of a living transitional anything that's in the process of macro evolving...
@Vegas do you believe in the above?jerrab » 28 Jul 2025, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑ it is in the old testament.
I don't believe the old testament was inspired/written by god.
MR-7 » 27 Jul 2025, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑ This tells a different story.
We already know that Hamas, often aided by UN agencies, has weaponized humanitarian aid. It steals and resells supplies to the Palestinian population at exorbitant prices, then uses the profits to fund and recruit terrorists. Israel's Channel 12 reported that Hamas made half a billion dollars from reselling aid, and The Washington Post recently published an exposé on Hamas's deteriorating financial position due to its inability to maintain control over and profit from that aid. Palestinians who refuse to comply with Hamas's grip on the aid economy risk being threatened, detained, or even executed.
How Hamas, UN are preventing aid from reaching Gazans
@jerra b
You're full of ****.jerrab » 30 Jul 2025, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑ what is known is that iraq attacks israel because israel kills the people in gaza.
the US response is to not tell israel to stop killing the people in gaza but to give israel more weapons.
so, by your logic, at 500 miles there s/b midsized people, while at 250 / 750 are quarter sized and three quarter sized respectively...Cannonpointer » 30 Jul 2025, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Again, I never argued for"macro-evolving" - or as peiople actually educated on the topic call it, "speciation."
The reason I made no such argument is that it's not my **** argument. I said that evolutionary forces caused midgetry and gigantism within a thousand miles of each other. And toes to toes or nose to **** nose, they did. The environments selected for physiognomy - period.
And since you took it this far down the road, let's just get something else on the table. Environments select for intelligence, too. THat's why Africans are not as smart as Europeans. They never needed smarts enough to plan for winter. They were hunters, gatherers, and in lean times, grubbers - not planners. Not city builders. Not agriculturalists.Not property owners and demarcaters. The closest thing they had to zoning laws was "Don't **** near the cook fire."
Now, macro give up because I am beginning to feel micro aggressed, you ***.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom You seem a bit confused. Their ENVIRONMENTS selected for their physiognomy. Not their distance from each other, you dummy. They could have been 50 miles or 5,000 miles apart -it was the ENVIRONMENT that selected for their size. And their intelligence.ROG62 » 30 Jul 2025, 7:02 pm » wrote: ↑ so, by your logic, at 500 miles there s/b midsized people, while at 250 / 750 are quarter sized and three quarter sized respectively...
But your comment above is OBJEXCTIVELY stupid. So, there's that.
Buttflap, leave the neologisms to me. You're having trouble with very basic concepts.
Got it....what jerrab does not get is simply this....Vegas » 31 Jul 2025, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑ I disagree. I believe it was written by God. Jerra is mentioning a specific contradiction. However, it's easy to find contradictions everywhere when taking specific verses out of context without considering the backstory.
So you're stating that people are either stupid or smart depending on where they sit geographically...Cannonpointer » 30 Jul 2025, 8:29 pm » wrote: ↑ You seem a bit confused. Their ENVIRONMENTS selected for their physiognomy. Not their distance from each other, you dummy. They could have been 50 miles or 5,000 miles apart -it was the ENVIRONMENT that selected for their size. And their intelligence.
But your comment above is OBJEXCTIVELY stupid. So, there's that.
Buttflap, leave the neologisms to me. You're having trouble with very basic concepts.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom