Liberal Forum

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 8:51 am

Sir,it seems you are getting upset over trivial matters.  Maybe you should slow down a bit.  Maybe go to the firing range and blow off some steam.

Aren't we all glad the McCloskey's got their AR-15's back?

Blackvegetable » 04 Aug 2025, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2025, 10:23 am

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 8:51 am

Sir,it seems you are getting upset over trivial matters.  Maybe you should slow down a bit.  Maybe go to the firing range and blow off some steam.

Aren't we all glad the McCloskey's got their AR-15's back?

 

That is a question, Sir, that most people with average reading skills knows has already been addressed.  

Notice ou are quoting again with links or a reference as to why.

I will say most people who support the constitution are happy.  

*Huey » 04 Aug 2025, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2025, 10:27 am

That is a question, Sir, that most people with average reading skills knows has already been addressed.  

Notice ou are quoting again with links or a reference as to why.

I will say most people who support the constitution are happy.

In a manner of speaking.


 

Blackvegetable » 04 Aug 2025, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2025, 10:28 am

In a manner of speaking.

Just for you: "**** you if you think I am going to define that for you. 

Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up."


Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors 

Blackvegetable » 04 Aug 2025, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2025, 10:28 am

*Huey » 04 Aug 2025, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2025, 10:27 am

That is a question, Sir, that most people with average reading skills knows has already been addressed.  

Notice ou are quoting again with links or a reference as to why.

I will say most people who support the constitution are happy.

In a manner of speaking.


 

 

They received a full pardon from the state, and their record was expunged.  That means relative the law it never happened.  That means they have no criminal record and are not barred from own firearms in the stat of MO.

No, it is not a matter of speaking.  It is a matter of law abiding citizens practicing their 2nd amendment rights.  You have no reason why they can't possess firearms in MO.

*Huey » 04 Aug 2025, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2025, 10:33 am

They received a full pardon from the state, and their record was expunged.  That means relative the law it never happened.  That means they have no criminal record and are not barred from own firearms in the stat of MO.

No, it is not a matter of speaking.  It is a matter of law abiding citizens practicing their 2nd amendment rights.  You have no reason why they can't possess firearms in MO.

The thread title is a question...

Get back to me in 2027.

Vegas » 04 Aug 2025, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2025, 10:32 am

Just for you: "**** you if you think I am going to define that for you. 

Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up."

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

I don't see your definition. 

Blackvegetable » 04 Aug 2025, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2025, 10:41 am

I don't see your definition.

I don't see you reading my examples to read my definition. 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 8:48 am

Officially, and conveniently, the price tag has been classified. 

"Blah...blah....it will belong to the Air Force.....blah....blah...blah.

Anyone that would write and peddle this crap off on the idiots dumb enough to pay for a subscription deserves to remain stupid.

You DO realize that there is ZERO "story" here. As in it's 100% speculation and then a massive dose of hyperbole to keep the losers entertained.

"Officially, and conveniently, the price tag has been classified. "

And the only "Moran" I see is the ones DUMB ENOUGH to pay the NY Slimes for this kind of BS "news". And those who use it as something to "Ding Trump" with a massive dose of TDS, are the DUMBEST "morans" around.

*Huey » 04 Aug 2025, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2025, 10:27 am

Blackvegetable » 04 Aug 2025, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2025, 10:23 am

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 8:51 am

Sir,it seems you are getting upset over trivial matters.  Maybe you should slow down a bit.  Maybe go to the firing range and blow off some steam.

Aren't we all glad the McCloskey's got their AR-15's back?


 

That is a question, Sir, that most people with average reading skills knows has already been addressed.  

Notice ou are quoting again with links or a reference as to why.

I will say most people who support the constitution are happy.  

 

On this thread you decided to bring up the McCluskey's,  So sir, I don't give a damn why the title is.  

Blackvegetable » 04 Aug 2025, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2025, 10:41 am

*Huey » 04 Aug 2025, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2025, 10:33 am

They received a full pardon from the state, and their record was expunged.  That means relative the law it never happened.  That means they have no criminal record and are not barred from own firearms in the stat of MO.

No, it is not a matter of speaking.  It is a matter of law abiding citizens practicing their 2nd amendment rights.  You have no reason why they can't possess firearms in MO.

The thread title is a question...

Get back to me in 2027.

 

Mr Vegetabe, Run, run far away

*Huey » 04 Aug 2025, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2025, 10:53 am

On this thread you decided to bring up the McCluskey's,  So sir, I don't give a damn why the title is.  

Mr Vegetabe, Run, run far away

Your commitment to that principle is tenuous...

Perhaps it's time to post the rule, to avoid any confusion.
 

Blackvegetable » 04 Aug 2025, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2025, 10:54 am

*Huey » 04 Aug 2025, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2025, 10:53 am

On this thread you decided to bring up the McCluskey's,  So sir, I don't give a damn why the title is.  

Mr Vegetabe, Run, run far away

Your commitment to that principle is tenuous...

Perhaps it's time to post the rule, to avoid any confusion.
 

 

No need.  On this thread you brought up something that was not part of the subject. I demonstrated that.  Game over on that point.  Once again you tried to be witty, which you shouldn't do OR you are suffering from confusion concerning what thread you are on.

*Huey » 04 Aug 2025, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2025, 11:04 am

No need.  On this thread you brought up something that was not part of the subject. I demonstrated that.  Game over on that point.  Once again you tried to be witty, which you shouldn't do OR you are suffering from confusion concerning what thread you are on.

Are we sure that it's not an alcoholic fog brain at play here.

Sure does look like a boozer and how much they don't have a clue what they said 2 minutes ago.

*Beekeeper » 04 Aug 2025, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2025, 11:09 am

*Huey » 04 Aug 2025, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2025, 11:04 am

No need.  On this thread you brought up something that was not part of the subject. I demonstrated that.  Game over on that point.  Once again you tried to be witty, which you shouldn't do OR you are suffering from confusion concerning what thread you are on.

Are we sure that it's not an alcoholic fog brain at play here.

Sure does look like a boozer and how much they don't have a clue what they said 2 minutes ago.

Mr. Vegetable clams he does not drink, maybe an occasional beer.  BUT, he does readily admit and brags about his life long  use of dope.  His memory is shot and he may be stoned already.
 

*Huey » 04 Aug 2025, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2025, 11:04 am

No need.  On this thread you brought up something that was not part of the subject. I demonstrated that.  Game over on that point.  Once again you tried to be witty, which you shouldn't do OR you are suffering from confusion concerning what thread you are on.

There's a serious need if you rely on it to get your way...

Blackvegetable » 04 Aug 2025, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2025, 11:23 am

*Huey » 04 Aug 2025, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2025, 11:04 am

No need.  On this thread you brought up something that was not part of the subject. I demonstrated that.  Game over on that point.  Once again you tried to be witty, which you shouldn't do OR you are suffering from confusion concerning what thread you are on.

There's a serious need if you rely on it to get your way...

 

If you are done with the topic YOU introduced on THIS thread I will take my leave, Dir.  I almost said GOOD Sir, but we know that I a lie.

*Huey » 04 Aug 2025, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2025, 11:13 am

Mr. Vegetable clams he does not drink, maybe an occasional beer.  BUT, he does readily admit and brags about his rifling used of dope.  His memory is shot and he may be stoned already.

https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/car ... -800x0.jpg