Liberal Forum

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 8:58 am

Yes, no ****.  And?  Unless you can show that the jury was not instructed to follow the law you got nothing but effluvium.

Penal Law doesn't apply to a CIVIL case.

To whom did Team Grifty address its petition to reduce the jury award?
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2025, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 9:01 am

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 8:58 am

Yes, no ****.  And?  Unless you can show that the jury was not instructed to follow the law you got nothing but effluvium.

Penal Law doesn't apply to a CIVIL case.

To whom did Team Grifty address its petition to reduce the jury award?
 

 

Mr. Vegeatble, due to running from questions and the standard you offered, which I accepted, not the Nuclear Sub thread you do not have questions privilege a the moment.

Plus, you question is not relevant to the jury instructions or the fact that the jury did not find that Carrol proved she was raped.

Any edits and/or posts will be ignored.

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 6:16 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 6:16 pm

How did you get my definition?

Prediction 1 fulfilled ^^^



1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me
4. Continue with non-answers.

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 5:51 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 5:51 pm

November, 2022

And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you.  Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up. 

Prediction 3 fulfilled ^^^ And that was a hilarious comment of mine. It obviously pissed you off. 
       


1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me
4. Continue with non-answers.

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 8:15 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 8:15 pm

Need some **** from YouTube, PedoRoad?

Back to back to back post fails.    lol

Vegas » 02 Aug 2025, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 9:40 am

Prediction 3 fulfilled ^^^ 

Everyone already knows you're a narcissist.

Vegas » 02 Aug 2025, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 9:38 am

Prediction 1 fulfilled ^^^

It's a fact...not a Prediction.

You're a **** idiot 
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 6:07 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 6:07 am

https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2 ... p-schools/

Trump is reviving the presidential fitness test. Did it work before?
The test was conducted in U.S. public schools for decades until it was retired by the Obama administration. Here’s what to know about it and why Trump wants it back.

Let's see him pass it...on PPV...Should be a snap for a guy built like an NFL safety.

Yer gonna run for office?          

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 6:07 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 6:07 am

https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2 ... p-schools/


Trump is reviving the presidential fitness test. Did it work before?
The test was conducted in U.S. public schools for decades until it was retired by the Obama administration. Here’s what to know about it and why Trump wants it back.




Let's see him pass it...on PPV...Should be a snap for a guy built like an NFL safety.=15pxMr. Vegetable, the"larders"
 

Re: If A Rapist Is Gonna Lead Our Moral Revival, Why Not An Incontinent, Bloated Lardass To Bring Us Back to Health.

Mr Vegetable, the lardass hit's a helluva a drive and would probably whip your scrawny 5'9" *** on the Golf Course.

Sir, as far as being built like an NFL safety at 5'9'' might be ok, that is on the small end.  Your weight is 15 lds less than the smallest starting safeties in the last 30 years. I will say with all the running you do you might have a bit of speed. But no, you are not but like and BFL sFTY.

The lightest starting safety in the NFL is often Zack Bronson,who played for the San Francisco 49ers and weighed 185 pounds, according to a 1999 article on NFL.com. Another relatively light safety was Tim McTyer, who played for the Cleveland Browns and weighed 181 pounds.   

I would love to have gone agains you in may prime which stretched forage 27-45.  Semi pro baseball, rec tackle football leagues, flag football with 20s and 30s between age 50-55.  Racquetball, ultimate freebee.Etc Etc.

 

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 10:53 am

Mr Vegetable, the lardass hit's a helluva a drive and would probably whip your scrawny 5'9" *** on the Golf Course.

Sir, as far as being built like an NFL safety at 

:rofl:  


Didn't you just have a "probably" bite the curb?

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2025, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 10:58 am

 

Didn't you just have a "probably" bite the curb?

Sorry, Mr. Veghead, that is not an accurate, in context representation of my words.  So I can't respond.  

BuckNaked » 02 Aug 2025, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 8:10 am

is that public information?

Hell yeah...
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2025, 7:04 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 7:04 am

When you post YOUR number.

I can tell by your lame rap.

Already done, brown...was a stunt double for the porn industry before I married...  

ROG62 » 02 Aug 2025, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 11:13 am

Already done, brown...was a stunt double for the porn industry before I married...

A stunt cornhole and fluffer...

But I'm talking Strictly Hetero

 

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2025, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 10:11 am

It's a fact...not a Prediction.

You're a **** idiot

It's also a deflection so you don't have to answer. Like you always do. Daily. 

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2025, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 10:10 am

Everyone already knows you're a narcissist.

       Blatant projection. Hello Mary. 
 

Vegas » 02 Aug 2025, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 12:41 pm

       Blatant projection. Hello Mary.

Do your rules apply to you?

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2025, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 12:42 pm

Do your rules apply to you?

What rules? I don't have any. 

Vegas » 02 Aug 2025, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 12:40 pm

It's also a deflection so you don't have to answer. Like you always do. Daily.

It's unambiguous evidence that you have had your question answered. 

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2025, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 12:43 pm

It's unambiguous evidence that you have had your question answered.

If there was an option E that said "Veghead posted his definition of survivorship bias" and you chose option E, then yes. However, that wasn't the question. 


But you already know that. Just more stalling. More winning for me.