Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 8:53 am

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 8:42 am

Mr Vegetable, you should have done some research:

Google AI:

when did high fructose corn syrup come out

High fructose corn syrup (HFCS) was first developed in 1957 by chemists Richard Marshall and Earl Kooi. It was commercially introduced in the late 1960s and gained widespread use in the 1970s and 1980s, particularly as a cheaper alternative to sugar. 

Sir, as much as it Pains me to say this:

Acknowledge that your jive has been taintpunted.

SIr, I would recommend that you stay away from this topic.

PS.  A man would not ask who was Prez during that time frame.  A man would say from Jan 2009 until Jan 2017 Obama was President AND he did away with the Physical Fitness Test.

Please stop.

Stick to running from your words and questions. 

From your source:
In the 1980s, Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) CEO Dwayne Andreas successfully lobbied President Ronald Reagan to enact a sugar import quota. This policy artificially increased the price of cane sugar, making high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) a cheaper alternative for the food industry, particularly in beverages. This shift had a significant impact on the American diet, contributing to the widespread use of HFCS in processed foods and potentially influencing health outcomes.

acknowledge that you've been schooled.
 

 

Sorry,your source does not debunk this:

gained widespread use in the 1970s and 1980s, particularly as a cheaper alternative to sugar. 

I know your job is too protect Obama but the fact of the matter is HFCS gained wide read use in the 70s and we had a Presidential Fitness Test.  Obama did away with it.  Now, child obesity is about 3 times higher.  Is the lack of the test the reason?  No, it is only part of it.
Now go back to protecting Obama, Mr Veggie.  Although at the moment he has much more pressing matters to worry about.

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 8:57 am

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 8:42 am

Mr Vegetable, you should have done some research:

Google AI:

when did high fructose corn syrup come out

High fructose corn syrup (HFCS) was first developed in 1957 by chemists Richard Marshall and Earl Kooi. It was commercially introduced in the late 1960s and gained widespread use in the 1970s and 1980s, particularly as a cheaper alternative to sugar. 

Sir, as much as it Pains me to say this:

Acknowledge that your jive has been taintpunted.

SIr, I would recommend that you stay away from this topic.

PS.  A man would not ask who was Prez during that time frame.  A man would say from Jan 2009 until Jan 2017 Obama was President AND he did away with the Physical Fitness Test.

As I said.

Taintpunted.

Acknowledge 
 

 

With respect, Mr Vegetable, I acknowledge you have been taintpunted.  

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 8:59 am

Sorry,your source does not debunk this:

gained widespread use in the 1970s and 1980s, particularly as a cheaper alternative to sugar. 

I know your job is too protect Obama but the fact of the matter is HFCS gained wide read use in the 70s and we had a Presidential Fitness Test.  Obama did away with it.  Now, child obesity is about 3 times higher.  Is the lack of the test the reason?  No, it is only part of it.
Now go back to protecting Obama, Mr Veggie.  Although at the moment he has much more pressing matters to worry about.

Once again, you cannot read.

How did hfcs become cost effective?

The why is far worse, as are the consequences..
 

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:01 am

With respect, Mr Vegetable, I acknowledge you have been taintpunted.

Watch yourself run...from your own source, and the plain meaning of text.


Again.
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:03 am

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 8:59 am

Sorry,your source does not debunk this:

gained widespread use in the 1970s and 1980s, particularly as a cheaper alternative to sugar. 

I know your job is too protect Obama but the fact of the matter is HFCS gained wide read use in the 70s and we had a Presidential Fitness Test.  Obama did away with it.  Now, child obesity is about 3 times higher.  Is the lack of the test the reason?  No, it is only part of it.
Now go back to protecting Obama, Mr Veggie.  Although at the moment he has much more pressing matters to worry about.

Once again, you cannot read.

How did hfcs become cost effective?

The why is far worse, as are the consequences..
 

 

again, 

gained widespread use in the 1970s and 1980s, particularly as a cheaper alternative to sugar. 

My original point stands.

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:05 am

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:01 am

With respect, Mr Vegetable, I acknowledge you have been taintpunted.

Watch yourself run...from your own source, and the plain meaning of text.


Again.
 

 

From my own source:

gained widespread use in the 1970s and 1980s, particularly as a cheaper alternative to sugar. 

What you posted DOES NOT deunk te above.  All it does is say what made it cheaper.  70's and 80s.  Oh, and by the way, they still the test in the 80s.

Speak about being taint punted in a major league way, Mr Vegetable.  You might want to move on.  Maybe find some boring finance thread where you can pretend you are an expert.
 

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:12 am

again, 

gained widespread use in the 1970s and 1980s, particularly as a cheaper alternative to sugar. 

My original point stands.

It has been taintpunted...by your source...which, apparently, you can no longer read.

 

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 6:07 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 6:07 am

https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2 ... p-schools/

Trump is reviving the presidential fitness test. Did it work before?
The test was conducted in U.S. public schools for decades until it was retired by the Obama administration. Here’s what to know about it and why Trump wants it back.

Let's see him pass it...on PPV...Should be a snap for a guy built like an NFL safety.

1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me
4. Continue with non-answers.

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:16 am

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:12 am

again, 

gained widespread use in the 1970s and 1980s, particularly as a cheaper alternative to sugar. 

My original point stands.

It has been taintpunted...by your source...which, apparently, you can no longer read.

 

 

Mr. Vegetable, (literally as well as figuratively) you do not anything that said it did not gain widespread use in the 70s.  All yo did was show something that made it cheaper. 

Sr, to quote, you are stapled shut.

Nod.

My work here is done. Yo **** hate losing to me. And you do ofter.  

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:14 am

From my own source:

gained widespread use in the 1970s and 1980s, particularly as a cheaper alternative to sugar. 

What you posted DOES NOT deunk te above.  All it does is say what made it cheaper.  70's and 80s.  Oh, and by the way, they still the test in the 80s.

Speak about being taint punted in a major league way, Mr Vegetable.  You might want to move on.  Maybe find some boring finance thread where you can pretend you are an expert.

It provides detail yours lacks...because your prompt sucked

Before price supports, hfcs was price prohibitive for many common uses.

Reagan, and other politicians, did it to bail out Andreas, who had a habit of spreading money around. When sugar briefly spiked, Andreas placed an enormous bet on hfcs facilities....then sugar collapsed, and ADM was at risk of going under.

Just acknowledge that you're in over your tiny head again.

 

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:16 am

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:12 am

again, 

gained widespread use in the 1970s and 1980s, particularly as a cheaper alternative to sugar. 

My original point stands.

It has been taintpunted...by your source...which, apparently, you can no longer read.

 

 

Same source:

While it's impossible to pinpoint the exact number of products containing high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) in the 1970s, it's clear that its use was rapidly increasing during that decade, especially after the mid-1970s. By 1979, HFCS was already a significant ingredient in many processed foods and beverages, including soft drinks, baked goods, and various canned goods. 

Yo lose again, Sir.

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:19 am

Mr. Vegetable, (literally as well as figuratively) you do not anything that said it did not gain widespread use in the 70s.  All yo did was show something that made it cheaper. 

Sr, to quote, you are stapled shut.

Nod.

My work here is done. Yo **** hate losing to me. And you do ofter.

Your source LITERALLY did so.

 

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:22 am

Same source:

While it's impossible to pinpoint the exact number of products containing high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) in the 1970s, it's clear that its use was rapidly increasing during that decade, especially after the mid-1970s. By 1979, HFCS was already a significant ingredient in many processed foods and beverages, including soft drinks, baked goods, and various canned goods. 

Yo lose again, Sir.

You can stop torturing your source for what you want to hear.

 

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:24 am

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:22 am

Same source:

While it's impossible to pinpoint the exact number of products containing high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) in the 1970s, it's clear that its use was rapidly increasing during that decade, especially after the mid-1970s. By 1979, HFCS was already a significant ingredient in many processed foods and beverages, including soft drinks, baked goods, and various canned goods. 

Yo lose again, Sir.

You can stop torturing your source for what you want to hear.

 

 

When one has to have the last word it is sure sign there argument was weak and they lost.

You may have the last word.

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:26 am

When one has to have the last word it is sure sign there argument was weak and they lost.

You may have the last word.

    Give him time. He is busy creeping around in your profile at the moment. 

Vegas » 01 Aug 2025, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:28 am

    Give him time. He is busy creeping around in your profile at the moment.

He is poking for stuff to save to his "Huey" file.  How disturbing. 

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:40 am

He is poking for stuff to save to his "Huey" file.  How disturbing.

Yep. He does the same with me and a few others. Psychotic. 

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 7:12 am

Answer the question...

You can't be made to understand the "special verdict" process.

Because you're an idiot.

brown, you stupid ****...

NOD


"the judges own instructions and the law at the time of the sexual assault, the jury found that Carroll did not present evidence she was raped.

ABC did not pay 16 million dollars based on your interpretation of what the judge said."

nod again...

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 7:10 am

After you post your number...

72...

ROG62 » 01 Aug 2025, 4:33 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 4:33 pm

brown, you stupid ****...


 

JuCo,

On what grounds did Team Grifty petition the court?


If you can't answer, you need to shut the **** up.

Nod.