They were moved closer to Russia...DeezerShoove » 01 Aug 2025, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Subs are already "deployed".
Just moving them around isn't quite as nerve-wracking as the headlines suggest.
The question remains whether these submarines are merely nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed. Certainly the latter scenario would mark a huge and dangerous escalation, and yet the US has always exercised ambiguity in this regard.""They're closer to Russia. Yeah, they're closer to Russia."
don’t tag me in your posts*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Not sure what Lie you are talking abut Mr Vegetable. above is one one the 17 times I agreed to your conditions. If you are too scared to participate. I do accept our surrender because in order to attempt your false point you had to delete most of the post.
Mrkelly » 02 Aug 2025, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑ don’t tag me in your posts
I have no desire to witness your hard on for BV
Tiny,*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Any edits to my comments (deletions) will bar you from any agreements for month.
Here was your question:
The Saab JAS 39 Gripen was developed to replace Sweden's aging fleet of Saab 35 Draken and Saab 37 Viggen fighter jets. Answer spot on. Next time be more specific.
Actually, no. YOU asked that question AFTER I agreed to you conditions with NO stipulations. After you fulfilled your obligation I was true to my word, with no ****, and answered your questions.
Tiny,Actually, no. YOU asked that question AFTER I agreed to you conditions with NO stipulations.
Edits of this post will ban you from questions for the next month regardless of conditions.Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2025, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑Tiny,*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Any edits to my comments (deletions) will bar you from any agreements for month.
Here was your question:
The Saab JAS 39 Gripen was developed to replace Sweden's aging fleet of Saab 35 Draken and Saab 37 Viggen fighter jets. Answer spot on. Next time be more specific.
Actually, no. YOU asked that question AFTER I agreed to you conditions with NO stipulations. After you fulfilled your obligation I was true to my word, with no ****, and answered your questions.
Who is telling you what the Gripen was designed for?Tiny,Actually, no. YOU asked that question AFTER I agreed to you conditions with NO stipulations.
You lied REPEATEDLY, and refused to acknowledge the specific conditions to which you claimed to agree.
Furthermore you declined to acknowledge that you were dictating them.
You insisted that you had the right to yet more answers.
**** idiot.
If your posts are unresponsive, I don't read the ****.
Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2025, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑If your posts are unresponsive, I don't read the ****.
Acknowledge that you've been told, again.
Tagging is this " @Huey "...*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑ I. just showing that multi quote works. Sir, while I will respect our request I must tell you that although I was in the army a long time I do not take to well to authoritarians telling me what to do. So with that said you are neither a higher ranking NCO than I was nor are you an offie.
Keep that in mind in the future.
Have a blessed day, Mr Kelly. God loves you.
you lead by example.
Cannonpointer » 02 Aug 2025, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑ But little trumpie running his mouth all reckless is nerve wracking.
What a jackass. He is doing EXACTLY the opposite of what he promised - like when he made a big show of playing golf all day after promising to stay off the links.
*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑ I. just showing that multi quote works. Sir, while I will respect our request I must tell you that although I was in the army a long time I do not take to well to authoritarians telling me what to do. So with that said you are neither a higher ranking NCO than I was nor are you an offie.
Keep that in mind in the future.
Have a blessed day, Mr Kelly. God loves you.
Leaders that run their mouth are as rare as hens' teeth. ITeddy famously intoned, "Walk softly, and carry a big stick."DeezerShoove » 02 Aug 2025, 4:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Lots of leaders run their mouth. Maybe I'm just used to it...
Eisenhower started it. Or was Teddy? Depends on the era, I guess.
Lincoln would have... but a 3 month old letter loses its punch.
Cannonpointer » 02 Aug 2025, 6:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Leaders that run their mouth are as rare as hens' teeth. ITeddy famously intoned, "Walk softly, and carry a big stick."
Ike did run his mouth kinda reckless - but he was heeled. There were two nations on the planet with nukes - and he only ran his mouth to the ones that didn't.
There isn't any precedent for Trump's clowning.
I think they made sure I knew the Trojan Horse story in 4th grade..DeezerShoove » 02 Aug 2025, 9:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Veiled threats have been within the essence of leadership for all of history.
Saber-rattling is not new by any means.
Trump version of that is what you seem to be at odds with.
JohnnyYou » 02 Aug 2025, 10:09 pm » wrote: ↑ I think they made sure I knew the Trojan Horse story in 4th grade..
Dumb as shyt for anyone to tell anyone where our nuclear strike assets are IMO.
It's a very stupid card to play in a mushroom cloudy world with a chance of fireballs.
Tesla saw unimaginable horrors. Einstein said WW4 will be fought with sticks and stones. We live in Oppenhiemer's nightmare everyday..
Mutually Assured Destruction is closer minute by minute. Smoke some Doobie Brothers and go to bed. Listen to the Music.
Nothing veiled about trump's threats - I think we can agree on that.DeezerShoove » 02 Aug 2025, 9:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Veiled threats have been within the essence of leadership for all of history.
Saber-rattling is not new by any means.
Trump version of that is what you seem to be at odds with.
You sort of make my point for me.Cannonpointer » 02 Aug 2025, 11:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Nothing veiled about trump's threats - I think we can agree on that.
What I have issue with is not JUST the saber rattling - which I do have issue with.
Buit far, far more, I have issue with saber rattling at ****. It's retarded. It literally forces people to tell him to **** off. He has a big hardon for Brazil. Last year they exported 3.36 billion ot the US and imported 3.96 billion. So they have a deficit, and that orange *** is hitting them with tariffs.
Hitting people you're already beating with tariffs is NOT ABOUT TRADE. It's about a big spoiled diaper baby abusing his power globally, and bringing the wrath of the entire world - save our EU slaves - against the US.
Mrkelly » 02 Aug 2025, 4:53 pm » wrote: ↑you are not in the military anymore Cletus
living in the past?
*Huey » 03 Aug 2025, 7:53 am » wrote: ↑ Mr. Kelly is turning into Captain Obvious.
I am from NYC Mr. Kelly, Cletus is southern or even and Indiana thing.
Sir, I am sure in your circle of friends and family they think you are witty and funny but if they loved they should advise you keep your "humor" among them.