Liberal Forum

*Huey » 03 Aug 2025, 8:00 am » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 8:00 am

Sir,  I am sure in your circle of friends and family they think you are witty and funny but if they loved they should advise you keep your "humor" among them.

 

Mrkelly » 03 Aug 2025, 8:02 am » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 8:02 am

Mr. Kelly for one who was a little whiny about getting tagged you sure are posting to me a lot.  

Carry on Sir.

*Huey » 03 Aug 2025, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 8:08 am

Mr. Kelly for one who was a little whiny about getting tagged you sure are posting to me a lot.  

Carry on Sir.

  Just don’t tag me during your mental masturbation with BV Cletus 

Mrkelly » 03 Aug 2025, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 8:12 am

  Just don’t tag me during your mental masturbation with BV Cletus

And yet here you are, Mr Kelly, trying to make it a threesome.  You keep right walking right into it.

*Huey » 03 Aug 2025, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 8:20 am

And yet here you are, Mr Kelly, trying to make it a threesome.  You keep right walking right into it.

  threesome? 

keep me out of your fantasies Cletus   

Mrkelly » 03 Aug 2025, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 10:26 am

  threesome? 

keep me out of your fantasies Cletus 

Mr Kelly, you were the one who brought up fantasies of masturbation.  Not me.  

Ae switching between Porn Hub and the Forum as we speak?  That is a bit risque.

*Huey » 03 Aug 2025, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 8:20 am

And yet here you are, Mr Kelly, trying to make it a threesome.  You keep right walking right into it.

@Mrkelly  You know kelly....Huey is right. You're the one who brought up fantasies of masturbation. I mean, it was a conversation between two...and you jumped in to make it a threesome. We got your number kelly.   

*Huey » 03 Aug 2025, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 10:30 am

Mr Kelly, you were the one who brought up fantasies of masturbation.  Not me.  

Ae switching between Porn Hub and the Forum as we speak?  That is a bit risque.

  Just pointing out your obsessions Cletus 

Look at your signature   
 

MR-7 » 03 Aug 2025, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 10:40 am

*Huey » 03 Aug 2025, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 8:20 am

And yet here you are, Mr Kelly, trying to make it a threesome.  You keep right walking right into it.

@Mrkelly  You know kelly....Huey is right. You're the one who brought up fantasies of masturbation. I mean, it was a conversation between two...and you jumped in to make it a threesome. We got your number kelly.   

 

Mr. Kelly does not like to be tagged.  Oops, My bad, I did it again.  My apologies.

*Huey » 03 Aug 2025, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 10:49 am

Mr. Kelly does not like to be tagged.  Oops, My bad, I did it again.  My apologies.

  You whine about being tagged Cletus

You even put a * in front of your name to prevent it   
 

Mrkelly » 03 Aug 2025, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 10:54 am

  You whine about being tagged Cletus

You even put a * in front of your name to prevent it 

That would be incorrect, Sir.  With all due respect I must correct the record.

1.  I did not really tag you.  Since I quoted someone who did you get notified again.

2.  I don't mind being tagged by reasonable posters who don't do it ofter.

3.  It is done because you have ONE poster who thinks he owns this joint who abuses.  He would tag people 5 times a day in threads they were not participating in.

It is kinda **** up that one person could ruin it but of course he did.

Nod.

*Huey » 03 Aug 2025, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 10:59 am

That would be incorrect, Sir.  With all due respect I must correct the record.

1.  I did not really tag you.  Since I quoted someone who did you get notified again.

2.  I don't mind being tagged by reasonable posters who don't do it ofter.

3.  It is done because you have ONE poster who thinks he owns this joint who abuses.  He would tag people 5 times a day in threads they were not participating in.

It is kinda **** up that one person could ruin it but of course he did.

Nod.

  What was this Cletus?

 
@Mrkelly  

See how multi quote works?  LMAO!



 

Mrkelly » 03 Aug 2025, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 11:03 am

  What was this Cletus?

@Mrkelly  

See how multi quote works?  LMAO!

Sir, some of us have had this issue with your before.  You are either a liar or not very bright.  I did not say I did not tag you once.  I did say that the second was me quoting someone who also tagged you.  You really don't have a firm grasp of how the forum tools work

And why are you still here, to use your own words, masterbating?

You don't read very well, Mr Kelly.  And it is very funny, Sir, that after whining that you did not want to be part of this, HOURS later you are still part of it.

 

*Huey » 03 Aug 2025, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 11:10 am

Sir, some of us have had this issue with your before.  You are either a liar or not very bright.  I did not say I did not tag you once.  I did say that the second was me quoting someone who also tagged you.  You really don't have a firm grasp of how the forum tools work

And why are you still here, to use your own words, masterbating?

You don't read very well, Mr Kelly.  And it is very funny, Sir, that after whining that you did not want to be part of this, HOURS later you are still part of it.

  Yur a funny guy Cletus 

DeezerShoove » 03 Aug 2025, 7:26 am » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 7:26 am

You sort of make my point for me.
A veiled threat is merely a threat. So Trump doesn't make a threat with a veil.
You just don't like the way he threatens.

A social/political parallel of sorts:
Coleman Young became mayor of Detroit. Like him or not some "analysts" look back at his series of terms with this conclusion. His first term was a necessary evil in the era of Civil Rights World War. He was a prick and a racist asshole for black folks (supposedly).
Then times changed and the Detroit landscape, forever altered, grew weary of what had become a racist emperor and a hypocritical thief.
Moral of the story this account: He may have been right man at the right time (his first term)... but times change.

Through the lens of Cronos, maybe the world needs a **** wildman (in some people's view) steering the boat off its current course. The constant drumbeat of pessimism about America on the wrong course, in decline, *** and nuts oozing into every building and home, etc, etc made it necessary to turn the boat.
When it's heading for the cliffs anyway, what have we got to lose?

The top three lines is where we diverge, and all the rest is where we concur. I want to say two things about your second sentence:

1. A veiled threat is scarier, because it leaves the downside to the threat-object's imagination. An open threat is weak, and only fools engage in those. I NEVER make an open threat, and I strongly doubt that you do. Open threats are just stupid. 

2. Now, a warning is a different matter. But you can't "warn" the entire planet and still be seen as a serious person. You threaten everyone everywhere all the time, and you are the negative doppelganger of Chuck Norris. No one on earth is accustomed to people using trade policy to prosecute personal grudges, as Trump did with Brazil - or to bribe countries on non-trade issues, as Trump did with Serbia and Kosovo. As much as America needs an enema, the global community needs a predictable environment in bilateral relations. Not everyone (hell not ANYONE) is going to open their cheeks like the EU did - and that is what Trump is demanding of most. 

No one wants a bull in the china closet more than I do. But his antics are not against the interests of the deep state. I think the clownishness certainly loses the deep state some credibility, and I celebrate that. That's what I voted for - anything but an empty suit reading a teleprompter. But damn, man. He's an ant-squirrel with a monkey-pistol playing dodge-ball with a nuclear football. He's looking like our Gorbachev, and he's likely to do just as **** a job winding this thing down. 

And the most horrible thing? When we are suddenly and without fanfare plunged into third world economic status and desperate times, not one mother **** on God's green earth is going to spend a bunch of money here in search of an American wife. Half of our women are insane man haters, half of them are fat pigs, and the third half got dicks under their skirts. 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 03 Aug 2025, 3:07 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 3:07 pm

The top three lines is where we diverge, and all the rest is where we concur. I want to say two things about your second sentence:

1. A veiled threat is scarier, because it leaves the downside to the threat-object's imagination. An open threat is weak, and only fools engage in those. I NEVER make an open threat, and I strongly doubt that you do. Open threats are just stupid. 

2. Now, a warning is a different matter. But you can't "warn" the entire planet and still be seen as a serious person. You threaten everyone everywhere all the time, and you are the negative doppelganger of Chuck Norris. No one on earth is accustomed to people using trade policy to prosecute personal grudges, as Trump did with Brazil - or to bribe countries on non-trade issues, as Trump did with Serbia and Kosovo. As much as America needs an enema, the global community needs a predictable environment in bilateral relations. Not everyone (hell not ANYONE) is going to open their cheeks like the EU did - and that is what Trump is demanding of most. 

No one wants a bull in the china closet more than I do. But his antics are not against the interests of the deep state. I think the clownishness certainly loses the deep state some credibility, and I celebrate that. That's what I voted for - anything but an empty suit reading a teleprompter. But damn, man. He's an ant-squirrel with a monkey-pistol playing dodge-ball with a nuclear football. He's looking like our Gorbachev, and he's likely to do just as **** a job winding this thing down. 

And the most horrible thing? When we are suddenly and without fanfare plunged into third world economic status and desperate times, not one mother **** on God's green earth is going to spend a bunch of money here in search of an American wife. Half of our women are insane man haters, half of them are fat pigs, and the third half got dicks under their skirts.

Their common sense is going to kill a lot of people. Probably most of them will be MAGA. They don't have the brain power or funds to get through this shyt storm.

It's scary a phook the dumb bastard carries the nuclear football.
 

JohnnyYou » 03 Aug 2025, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 3:14 pm

Their common sense is going to kill a lot of people. Probably most of them will be MAGA. They don't have the brain power or funds to get through this shyt storm.

It's scary a phook the dumb bastard carries the nuclear football.

I don't think you've thought this through. The blue staters are surrounded by your "diversity" types. Your nigs and such. They'll go to killing at the drop of a hat. They'll go after you like black on white crime. 

The MAGAs are your red staters - mostly white neighbors, lots of self-sufficiency. They grow a lot of their own food. I have a garden and I have hens and I have connections to farmers. I also have a couple of years worth of staples. I have field guides for foraging local fields and forests. I have jars and lids for canning what I grow and forage. I've actually studied on this ****, spent money on this ****. You haven't, is my bet. And I would give odds on that bet.

I am your typical MAGA - self sufficient to some degree, connected to others of a like mind, living with and around skilled people, prepared for an emergency that I believe is coming. I doubt you have ever even considered what your water source will be if the utility you rely on gets blown up orloses function due to some catastrophe. You don't have a back up for anything that you rely on. I have backups for my backs ups, including a whole house generator. I didn't take an experimental shot - most MAGA didn't. 

You've got the life expectancy of a house fly, if the **** hits the fan, son. I've got a puncher's chance. MAGA has a puncher's chance. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cQNkIrg-Tk
 

Cannonpointer » 03 Aug 2025, 3:07 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 3:07 pm

The top three lines is where we diverge, and all the rest is where we concur. I want to say two things about your second sentence:

1. A veiled threat is scarier, because it leaves the downside to the threat-object's imagination. An open threat is weak, and only fools engage in those. I NEVER make an open threat, and I strongly doubt that you do. Open threats are just stupid. 

2. Now, a warning is a different matter. But you can't "warn" the entire planet and still be seen as a serious person. You threaten everyone everywhere all the time, and you are the negative doppelganger of Chuck Norris. No one on earth is accustomed to people using trade policy to prosecute personal grudges, as Trump did with Brazil - or to bribe countries on non-trade issues, as Trump did with Serbia and Kosovo. As much as America needs an enema, the global community needs a predictable environment in bilateral relations. Not everyone (hell not ANYONE) is going to open their cheeks like the EU did - and that is what Trump is demanding of most. 

No one wants a bull in the china closet more than I do. But his antics are not against the interests of the deep state. I think the clownishness certainly loses the deep state some credibility, and I celebrate that. That's what I voted for - anything but an empty suit reading a teleprompter. But damn, man. He's an ant-squirrel with a monkey-pistol playing dodge-ball with a nuclear football. He's looking like our Gorbachev, and he's likely to do just as **** a job winding this thing down. 

And the most horrible thing? When we are suddenly and without fanfare plunged into third world economic status and desperate times, not one mother **** on God's green earth is going to spend a bunch of money here in search of an American wife. Half of our women are insane man haters, half of them are fat pigs, and the third half got dicks under their skirts.

You meant "china shop".   

Two If By Tea » 01 Aug 2025, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 3:25 pm

Nuclear Subs deployed stratetgic positions in aftermath of spat with Russia over Ukraine...

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/trump ... -statement
 

I am sure they were there before the strategic positions were established long before this current release of information was made just as Russian subs are off the coast of USA.