Liberal Forum

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 12:43 pm

I am sorry.  

Then move along.

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2025, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 12:45 pm

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 12:43 pm

I am sorry.  

Then move along.

 

It appears Mr Blackvegetable is a surrender monkey.

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 12:43 pm

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2025, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 12:41 pm

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 12:40 pm

Not sure what Lie you are talking abut Mr Vegetable.  above is one one the 17 times I agreed to your conditions.  If you are too scared to participate.  I do accept our surrender because in order to attempt your false point you had to delete most of the post.

Back to

Are these your words?

Remember, you get two questions on the topic. I then get two more.  

 
 


 

I am sorry.  I have agreed to your terms as YOU wrote 17 times. Foe th 18th time I agree to your conditions as you wrote them. Which I will repost momentarily.  

After you answer the two questions/asks I posed to you YOU get to ask me any two questions you like.  If that is one of your questions I will be morere than happy to answer it.  

 

And Mr. Vegetable, I don't want you to miss this post.

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 12:44 pm

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2025, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 7:18 am

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 7:12 am

Mr. Vegetable, you have two questions on the table that must be addressed first.  




 

2 questions,  right?

After which you will owe 2 answers, correct?

 


 

For the 19th time I agree to those conditions with no stipulation.  Ball is in your court, Boy.

 

 

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 6:52 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 6:52 am

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2025, 6:37 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 6:37 am

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 6:35 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 6:35 am

Sir, last I checked Sweden was  not only NOT a world dominating military power they also were not targeted by either the US or the Soviet Union.

Mr. Vegetable, with commits like that YOU make it hard to believe your tales of your Alma Mater.

last I checked

stuff you read?

You know what comes next, Verbal...


 

No, Mr Vegetable, the years I lived thru.  Here is what comes next Mr Vegetable:

1.  Tell us when Sweden was had a world dominating military.

2.  Exactly what nuclear power target Sweden. Not Finland or any militarily important piece of real estate, but Sweden

 

Sir, those are your two questions/asks. And those are the conditions I have agreed to.  This is the 20th time.  I should pin this for pure enjoyment at your embarrassment.

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2025, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 7:18 am

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 7:12 am

Mr. Vegetable, you have two questions on the table that must be addressed first.  



 

2 questions,  right?

After which you will owe 2 answers, correct?

 

 

 

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 12:44 pm

For the 19th time I agree to those conditions with no stipulation.  Ball is in your court, Boy.

Sweden was a dominant power in Europe from about 1660 to 1718....at the time Europe WAS "the world".

Whether Sweden would be directly targeted is largely irrelevant....the large Soviet installation at Rostock is less than 100 miles from Sweden, placing Sweden within a potential fallout zone.

Given its location, it would be subject to missed firings from both sides 

Acknowledge that you've been answered and are now in my debt.

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 12:51 pm

Sir, those are your two questions/asks. And those are the conditions I have agreed to.  This is the 20th time.  I should pin this for pure enjoyment at your embarrassment.

This is the 20th time

You keep demonstrating that you are lying.

 

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 12:49 pm

It appears Mr Blackvegetable is a surrender monkey.

And Mr. Vegetable, I don't want you to miss this post.

To whom does it appear so?

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2025, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 12:52 pm

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 12:44 pm

For the 19th time I agree to those conditions with no stipulation.  Ball is in your court, Boy.

Sweden was a dominant power in Europe from about 1660 to 1718....at the time Europe WAS "the world".

Whether Sweden would be directly targeted is largely irrelevant....the large Soviet installation at Rostock is less than 100 miles from Sweden, placing Sweden within a potential fallout zone.

Given its location, it would be subject to missed firings from both sides 

Acknowledge that you've been answered and are now in my debt.

 

About **** time.  20 **** times I said I agreed.

In response you did not post who was targeting.  I will accept your weak 17 and 18th century although it was not the world.  

THe prevailing wind in Europe are westerly, meaning the wind goes from WEST to EAST.  Rostock is EAST of Sweden.  But by all means ask any 2 questions you like.  Choose wisely.  Yo only get TWO.

TwoIfByTea » 01 Aug 2025, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 3:25 pm

Nuclear Subs deployed stratetgic positions in aftermath of spat with Russia over Ukraine...

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/trump ... -statement

Heteros negotiate and homos escalate.

Trump just threatened to nuke Russia. That won't go well. 
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2025, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 12:54 pm

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 12:49 pm

It appears Mr Blackvegetable is a surrender monkey.

And Mr. Vegetable, I don't want you to miss this post.

To whom does it appear so?

 

To clarify, is that one of your TWO questions?

DeezerShoove » 01 Aug 2025, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 3:33 pm

Subs are already "deployed".
Just moving them around isn't quite as nerve-wracking as the headlines suggest.

But little trumpie running his mouth all reckless is nerve wracking. 

What a jackass. He is doing EXACTLY the opposite of what he promised - like when he made a big show of playing golf all day after promising to stay off the links.
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2025, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 12:53 pm

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 12:51 pm

Sir, those are your two questions/asks. And those are the conditions I have agreed to.  This is the 20th time.  I should pin this for pure enjoyment at your embarrassment.

This is the 20th time

You keep demonstrating that you are lying.

     
 

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 1:01 pm

About **** time.  20 **** times I said I agreed.

 

Post what you agreed to "20 **** times".

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 1:02 pm

To clarify, is that one of your TWO questions?

Not unless you owe me a third answer.

**** idiot.
 

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 12:49 pm

It appears Mr Blackvegetable is a surrender monkey.

And Mr. Vegetable, I don't want you to miss this post.

Looks like @*HooooeyVagina lied again.

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2025, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 1:22 pm

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 1:02 pm

To clarify, is that one of your TWO questions?

Not unless you owe me a third answer.

**** idiot.
 

 

Ok, then please reply to this message with your two questions.  Choose wisely.  Because the conditions you answer to and I answer two.

Waiting on you.

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2025, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 1:24 pm

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 12:49 pm

It appears Mr Blackvegetable is a surrender monkey.

And Mr. Vegetable, I don't want you to miss this post.

Looks like @*HooooeyVagina lied again.

 

I am waiting on your two questions.  You answered mine.  So now you get two and only two.  Any more that will require and agreement.

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 1:29 pm

Ok, then please reply to this message with your two questions.  Choose wisely.  Because the conditions you answer to and I answer two.

Waiting on you.

For what purpose was the JAS 39 Gripen developed?

Are these 

Remember, you get two questions on the topic. I then get two more.  

your words?
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2025, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 1:33 pm

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 1:29 pm

Ok, then please reply to this message with your two questions.  Choose wisely.  Because the conditions you answer to and I answer two.

Waiting on you.

For what purpose was the JAS 39 Gripen developed?

Are these 

Remember, you get two questions on the topic. I then get two more.  

your words?
 

 

Any edits (deletions ) of my comments when you reply will bar you from making anymore agreement for at least a month.



Here is one:
The Saab JAS 39 Gripen was developed to replace Sweden's aging fleet of Saab 35 Draken and Saab 37 Viggen fighter jets. It was designed to be a multirole aircraft capable of air-to-air combat, air-to-ground attack, and reconnaissance (the "JAS" in its name stands for Jakt, Attack, and Spaning, meaning fighter, attack, and reconnaissance in Swedish).The Gripen was also intended to be affordable, easy to maintain, and capable of operating from dispersed, austere airbases, reflecting Sweden's Cold War defense strategy. 

They only have about 00 of them and the design dates back to the late 70s.

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 7:31 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 7:31 am

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2025, 7:25 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 7:25 am

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 7:21 am

Sure.  I will answer what you already asked then it will be my turn to ask.  And this will be the standard going forward on any thread.

An unambiguous answer to each question.

  I will answer what you already asked then it will be my turn to ask

No...you will answer the two questions you are asked.

 


 

Mr. Vegetable, below are your two asks.  No sir, to be very blunt, it is time for you to **** or get off the pot.  Remember, you get two questions on the topic. I then get two more.  

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 6:52 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 6:52 am

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2025, 6:37 am » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 6:37 am

stuff you read?

You know what comes next, Verbal...



 

No, Mr Vegetable, the years I lived thru.  Here is what comes next Mr Vegetable:

1.  Tell us when Sweden was had a world dominating military.

2.  Exactly what nuclear power target Sweden. Not Finland or any militarily important piece of real estate, but Sweden


 

 

 

Of course they are my words.  My name is on the quote.  With respect sir.,  must say DUH.  You also need to keep in mind the post was made at 0831 this morning.  That is why earlier I asked you to compare the time stamp to the much later comments, 20 of them,where I agreed unconditionally to your conditions.

 

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 1:49 pm

Any edits (deletions ) of my comments when you reply will bar you from making anymore agreement for at least a month.

Here is one:
The Saab JAS 39 Gripen was developed to replace Sweden's aging fleet of Saab 35 Draken and Saab 37 Viggen fighter jets. It was designed to be a multirole aircraft capable of air-to-air combat, air-to-ground attack, and reconnaissance (the "JAS" in its name stands for Jakt, Attack, and Spaning, meaning fighter, attack, and reconnaissance in Swedish).The Gripen was also intended to be affordable, easy to maintain, and capable of operating from dispersed, austere airbases, reflecting Sweden's Cold War defense strategy. 

They only have about 00 of them and the design dates back to the late 70s.

Of course they are my words.  My name is on the quote.  With respect sir.,  must say DUH.  You also need to keep in mind the post was made at 0831 this morning.  That is why earlier I asked you to compare the time stamp to the much later comments, 20 of them,where I agreed unconditionally to your conditions.

That's some fine ******.....another **** job of prompting AI.

Sweden's armed forces said six of the country's JAS 39 Gripen fighter aircraft landed at an air base in Malbork, Poland, on Wednesday to join an alliance airspace surveillance mission. 
Both Sweden and Finland built their militaries with a threat from Russia in mind, and the Gripen was one such project.

 The jets, made by the Swedish aerospace and defense company Saab AB, were specifically built to counter Russia. The commander of Sweden's air force at the time, Mats Helgesson, said in 2019 that the Gripen was "designed to kill Sukhois," a type of Russian jet.


https://www.businessinsider.com/sweden- ... ime-2025-3

That is why earlier I asked you to compare the time stamp to the much later comments, 20 of them,where I agreed unconditionally to your conditions.

That's your job, Tiny Coward.

Blackvegetable » 02 Aug 2025, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 1:54 pm

Blackvegetable

*Huey » 02 Aug 2025, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Aug 2025, 1:49 pm

Any edits (deletions ) of my comments when you reply will bar you from making anymore agreement for at least a month.

Here is one:
The Saab JAS 39 Gripen was developed to replace Sweden's aging fleet of Saab 35 Draken and Saab 37 Viggen fighter jets. It was designed to be a multirole aircraft capable of air-to-air combat, air-to-ground attack, and reconnaissance (the "JAS" in its name stands for Jakt, Attack, and Spaning, meaning fighter, attack, and reconnaissance in Swedish).The Gripen was also intended to be affordable, easy to maintain, and capable of operating from dispersed, austere airbases, reflecting Sweden's Cold War defense strategy. 

They only have about 00 of them and the design dates back to the late 70s.

Of course they are my words.  My name is on the quote.  With respect sir.,  must say DUH.  You also need to keep in mind the post was made at 0831 this morning.  That is why earlier I asked you to compare the time stamp to the much later comments, 20 of them,where I agreed unconditionally to your conditions.

That's some fine ******.....another **** job of prompting AI.

Sweden's armed forces said six of the country's JAS 39 Gripen fighter aircraft landed at an air base in Malbork, Poland, on Wednesday to join an alliance airspace surveillance mission. 
Both Sweden and Finland built their militaries with a threat from Russia in mind, and the Gripen was one such project.

 The jets, made by the Swedish aerospace and defense company Saab AB, were specifically built to counter Russia. The commander of Sweden's air force at the time, Mats Helgesson, said in 2019 that the Gripen was "designed to kill Sukhois," a type of Russian jet.


https://www.businessinsider.com/sweden- ... ime-2025-3

That is why earlier I asked you to compare the time stamp to the much later comments, 20 of them,where I agreed unconditionally to your conditions.

That's your job, Tiny Coward.
 

Any edits to my comments (deletions) will bar you from any agreements for month.
Here was your question:

For what purpose was the JAS 39 Gripen developed?
 

The Saab JAS 39 Gripen was developed to replace Sweden's aging fleet of Saab 35 Draken and Saab 37 Viggen fighter jets.  Answer spot on.  Next time be more specific.

That's your job, Tiny Coward. 

Actually, no.  YOU asked that question AFTER I agreed to you conditions with NO stipulations.  After you fulfilled your obligation I was true to my word, with no ****, and answered your questions.