Liberal Forum

nefarious101 » 03 Aug 2025, 4:25 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 4:25 pm

Hey Fake News Dickhead...

You Pedo=Progressives sure are desperate for anything to go your way

but it won't....you people are broken....too broken to even realize you're broken

did you hear....SCOTUS is looking at illegal gerrymandering based on race and ethnic favoritism....

Looks like you all are going to bleed out in 2026.

that will give Trump more time to grind your worthless outdated politics into the dirt

Yeehahhh ****!!...right?

Did you hear?  SCOTUS made or discussed a decsion to make sure MAGA can gerrymander the voting districts all over the country. Have you heard Texas has had special legislative sessions to figure out where to draw the lines? It's the only phooking way you guys can win in 2026.  Ya got 15 months left.

The only way MAGA can win is rigging this vote.  Everybody knows you are shyt.  Ya got your 38% and the 7% who are afraid to say they hate Trump.  His overall approval is the worst of any president in the history of presidents.  Even HIS First Term!!! LOL. 

You are an idiot. Your fascination with pedophilia makes me wonder if the accuser should be accused.

 

JohnnyYou » 03 Aug 2025, 4:46 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 4:46 pm

Did you hear?  SCOTUS made or discussed a decsion to make sure MAGA can gerrymander the voting districts all over the country. Have you heard Texas has had special legislative sessions to figure out where to draw the lines? It's the only phooking way you guys can win in 2026.  Ya got 15 months left.

The only way MAGA can win is rigging this vote.  Everybody knows you are shyt.  Ya got your 38% and the 7% who are afraid to say they hate Trump.  His overall approval is the worst of any president in the history of presidents.  Even HIS First Term!!! LOL. 

You are an idiot. Your fascination with pedophilia makes me wonder if the accuser should be accused.

There you go again....

MAGA is doing what pedo=progressive have done for decades....and....the race and ethnic thing makes it totally illegal to boot.

You do want things to be legal don't you?....MAGA does
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Aug 2025, 4:37 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 4:37 pm

The place was your La Grange, right?

Hey Fake News Dickhead...

Paid fake news too....but not anymore.....the pedo=progressive game of smoke and mirrors has be crushed....by DJT

nefarious101 » 03 Aug 2025, 4:54 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 4:54 pm

Hey Fake News Dickhead...

Paid fake news too....but not anymore.....the pedo=progressive game of smoke and mirrors has be crushed....by DJT

This great big radish?

This steaming left footer?

Looks likes he rides Bitch, side saddle...

JohnnyYou » 03 Aug 2025, 4:46 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 4:46 pm

Did you hear?  SCOTUS made or discussed a decsion to make sure MAGA can gerrymander the voting districts all over the country. Have you heard Texas has had special legislative sessions to figure out where to draw the lines? It's the only phooking way you guys can win in 2026.  Ya got 15 months left.

The only way MAGA can win is rigging this vote.  Everybody knows you are shyt.  Ya got your 38% and the 7% who are afraid to say they hate Trump.  His overall approval is the worst of any president in the history of presidents.  Even HIS First Term!!! LOL. 

You are an idiot. Your fascination with pedophilia makes me wonder if the accuser should be accused.

Redistricting, gerrymandering, and reconfiguring has been a HUGE part of the Democratic Party Playbook for a long, LONG time. Just take a look at NY, IL, CA, NJ, MD.  Turnabout is ALWAYS fair play in politics. Buh bye Jasmine!   
 
 

JohnnyYou » 03 Aug 2025, 4:46 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 4:46 pm

Did you hear?  

Redistricting happens after every census.  Not every state decides to do so, but it is reviewed and considered with clockwork regularity.  While the news stories and Democratic Party outrage is being leveraged against Texas, there are 17 states with redistricting on their debate agendas this year.  They are just so mad at Texas because it has inherited so many refugees from Democrat controlled states they show a major increase.  If the Democrats feel the redistricting in Texas is unlawful, then they can file a legal complaint in the Texas courts. So much WINNING!

JohnnyYou » 03 Aug 2025, 4:46 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 4:46 pm

The only way MAGA can win is rigging this vote.  

Are you chastising Obama/Biden for the Russia collusion hoax to influence an election, the lies about Biden's health, Autopen, allowing 12 million illegals to enter to grow Democratic voter numbers?
 

MR-7 » 03 Aug 2025, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 5:10 pm

Redistricting happens after every census.  Not every state decides to do so, but it is reviewed and considered with clockwork regularity.  While the news stories and Democratic Party outrage is being leveraged against Texas, there are 17 states with redistricting on their debate agendas this year.  They are just so mad at Texas because it has inherited so many refugees from Democrat controlled states they show a major increase.  If the Democrats feel the redistricting in Texas is unlawful, then they can file a legal complaint in the Texas courts. So much WINNING!

Sole's Gal Says!!!  Family Fued!!!  Yeah she is a little whacked out on this inquiry.

what is going on with voting districts in Texas?
Recent actions and developments regarding voting districts in Texas include:
Democrats fleeing the state: Texas Democrats are leaving the state to prevent a quorum in the House, aiming to block a vote on new congressional maps proposed by Republicans. This move is a tactic used previously by Texas Democrats to oppose legislation they deem detrimental.
Proposed Congressional redistricting: Republicans have introduced a new map that aims to create five new seats that voted for the Republican presidential candidate in the previous election, potentially expanding the Republican House majority. This proposal includes merging the Houston-area seats of Rep. Al Green with a vacant seat and eliminating the Austin-area seat of Rep. Greg Casar, likely forcing a primary contest with another Democrat, Rep. Lloyd Doggett. Democrats view this as a partisan effort to bolster Republican chances in the 2026 midterm elections.
Ongoing legal challenges to 2021 maps: Lawsuits are still challenging the state legislative and congressional maps drawn in 2021, alleging they discriminate against Black and Latino voters. A trial is currently underway in a federal court in El Paso to determine if the maps intentionally discriminate against some Black and Latino voters.
Presidential influence and mid-decade redistricting: It's been reported that members of President Trump's political team urged Texas Republicans to redraw their maps before the 2026 midterms. Governor Abbott announced that mid-decade redistricting would be on the agenda for an upcoming special session, citing “constitutional concerns raised by the Department of Justice”. 
Key aspects of Texas voting districts
Single-party control: Texas’ redistricting process has been primarily under single-party control, leading to numerous legal challenges alleging racial and political discrimination.
Racial and political gerrymandering: Lawsuits often claim that maps drawn by the Republican-led legislature have been racially or politically discriminatory.
Discrimination claims persist: Fast-growing and diversifying Texas faces more map challenges this redistricting cycle than any other state, raising concerns about potential discrimination against Black and Latino voters. 
These events highlight the contentious nature of redistricting in Texas, with Republicans aiming to strengthen their political position and Democrats fighting back against what they perceive as discriminatory practices. The ongoing legal challenges and the potential for a mid-decade redraw further underscore the volatile landscape of voting districts in the state. 
AI responses may include mistakes. Learn more

Blackvegetable » 03 Aug 2025, 5:05 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 5:05 pm

This great big radish?

This steaming left footer?

Looks likes he rides Bitch, side saddle...

Cha-Ching Fake News Dickhead.....

I triggered your *******

Thanks for confirmation!

nefarious101 » 03 Aug 2025, 5:18 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 5:18 pm

Cha-Ching Fake News Dickhead.....

I triggered your *******

Thanks for confirmation!

Stay centered, Naffy....

MR-7 » 03 Aug 2025, 5:14 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 5:14 pm

Are you chastising Obama/Biden for the Russia collusion hoax to influence an election, the lies about Biden's health, Autopen, allowing 12 million illegals to enter to grow Democratic voter numbers?

Prove it .. Or take the autopen and cram it up his azz like a sharpie in a hurricane.

what was the recent US supreme court action regarding voting rights?
Most recently, on July 24, 2025, the Supreme Court temporarily blocked a federal appeals court ruling that could have significantly limited the reach of the Voting Rights Act. The appeals court had ruled that private individuals and groups cannot sue under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which prohibits racial discrimination in voting. This decision would have significantly curtailed the ability to challenge voting laws that disproportionately affect minority voters. The Supreme Court's order pauses the appeals court ruling to allow time for the plaintiffs, two Native American tribes and several individual voters, to file a formal appeal asking the Supreme Court to review the case. 
In a related but separate case, on August 1, 2025, the Supreme Court signaled that it will likely assess the constitutionality of a key provision of the Voting Rights Act that allows states to create majority-minority districts to address racial discrimination in voting. The justices specifically requested briefs addressing whether the "intentional creation of a second majority-minority congressional district violates the Fourteenth or Fifteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution". This case involves a challenge to Louisiana's congressional map, which currently has two majority-Black districts following a judicial order to remedy a previous Voting Rights Act violation. 
Broader context
These recent developments highlight the ongoing legal battles surrounding the Voting Rights Act and the potential for the Supreme Court's conservative majority to further narrow its reach. The Court has already weakened the Act through previous decisions, notably in Shelby County v. Holder (2013) and Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee (2021). While the Court ruled in favor of Black voters in Allen v. Milligan (2023), the Alliance for Justice argues that the Court's current direction threatens to dismantle the VRA's core protections, making it harder to ensure racial equality at the ballot box. 
The legal community is closely watching these cases, as the Supreme Court's decisions could have significant implications for the future of voting rights in the United States and the composition of electoral districts nationwide. 
AI responses may include mistakes. Learn more
 

MR-7 » 03 Aug 2025, 5:14 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 5:14 pm

Are you chastising Obama/Biden for the Russia collusion hoax to influence an election, the lies about Biden's health, Autopen, allowing 12 million illegals to enter to grow Democratic voter numbers?

No, like BV.....the moron doesn't even know it happened. Dianne Feinstein had a Red Chinese spy as a chauffeur for 17 years...that's how stupid democrats are.

nefarious101 » 03 Aug 2025, 5:18 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 5:18 pm

Cha-Ching Fake News Dickhead.....

I triggered your *******

Thanks for confirmation!

Small imaginary victories in your head are all you get.  Like how hard you think your limp dick is watching kid porn.

The accuser should be the accused... Am I right?

I was just recalling how a staunch conservative (high up in mgmt, number two bean counter if I recall.. some project mgmt he sucked at, always tough deadlines missed deliverables.. etc etc..) we all worked with got busted for pedo sex trafficking.  He is currently serving a 13 year sentence. The girls were younger than that. It was quite the shick. It came out in 2024 after twenty years of disconnect from work relations.

Steve Brown.. I think Hagerstown MD or there abouts. Maybe Washington County. I could look it up but not allowed to share the public crimnal record info and can't do links here anyway.

A town is as big as you want it to be. It's a small world after all.
 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Aug 2025, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 2:57 pm

But as a matter of principle, as a matter of character, Trump has proven himself unworthy to be this country’s chief executive again.

https://nypost.com/2022/07/22/trumps-ja ... eelection/

An opinion piece. He proves my media comment.           

JohnnyYou » 03 Aug 2025, 5:21 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 5:21 pm

Prove it .. Or take the autopen and cram it up his azz like a sharpie in a hurricane.

 

On the Pontoon.. ohh hoo hoo who?

provide a synopsis on President Trump's approval rating over time since 2015
Synopsis of President Donald Trump's approval ratings (2015-Present)
Donald Trump's approval ratings have been a consistent subject of public discourse and polling since his entry into the political arena in 2015. Throughout his first and second terms in office, his approval has been closely tracked and analyzed.
Here's a breakdown of the general trends:
Consistent negativity (largely): Trump's approval ratings have consistently hovered below 50% for much of his political career, remaining in negative territory for most of his first term.
Fluctuations and Influences: While typically negative, Trump's approval ratings have shown fluctuations influenced by various factors, including the state of the economy, specific policies, and handling of both domestic and international events.
Second Term Trajectory: His second term began with a period of positive net approval, with a January 2025 approval rating of 52%. However, this lead quickly dissipated by March, and his approval ratings have since trended downwards.
Recent Decline: Recent polls indicate a significant decline in his approval, reaching lows for his second term. Gallup reported a 37% approval rating in July 2025, a drop from 47% in January, largely driven by a decrease in support among independents. The New York Times reports have also noted a faster decline than for some predecessors, though not unprecedented.
Comparison to First Term: Despite the recent downturn, July 2025 approval ratings remain higher than Trump's average approval during his first term (41%).
Key Demographics: Trump continues to maintain positive ratings among certain demographics, including rural voters, men, older Americans (50+), Republicans, white voters, and those with lower incomes.
In essence, Donald Trump's approval ratings since 2015 have been marked by a generally negative trend, punctuated by periods of fluctuation and recent decline, particularly during his second term

Worthy of a Thread Title.

"Gallup reported a 37% approval rating in July 2025, a drop from 47% in January"

JohnnyYou » 03 Aug 2025, 6:03 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 6:03 pm

On the Pontoon.. ohh hoo hoo who?

 

That's just devastating news. I know...I'm gonna put that in my "TRUMP can't win" slide show folder.   

MR-7 » 03 Aug 2025, 6:08 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 6:08 pm

That's just devastating news. I know...I'm gonna put that in my "TRUMP can't win" slide show folder. 

He lost in 2020 and tried to cheat. All the claims of rigging the election and the only fraud I hear about was for Trump.  And a handful of cases at that.
 
You had the Guiliani machine and now you have one of his cigars in your ***.  Clinton and Monica are laughing at you..

Blackvegetable » 03 Aug 2025, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Aug 2025, 2:23 pm

Yes..

It is one of the many reasons I'm much better informed than you.