It's relative to whom it appears so...*Huey » 04 Aug 2025, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑ Apparently you do. You got SEVEN posts on the thread. And when they were arrested you really cared about it. When things don't don't go your way you suddenly don't care.
You celebrated their arrest and charges. You Enron amd on about it. And suddenly you don’t care.Blackvegetable » 04 Aug 2025, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑It's relative to whom it appears so...*Huey » 04 Aug 2025, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑ Apparently you do. You got SEVEN posts on the thread. And when they were arrested you really cared about it. When things don't don't go your way you suddenly don't care.
Oh, f'n a.....DeezerShoove » 04 Aug 2025, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
Lots of people do, son.
They epitomize the value of Black oLives Matter.
You keep forgetting your rule...*Huey » 04 Aug 2025, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑ You celebrated their arrest and charges. You Enron amd on about it. And suddenly you don’t care.
Blackvegetable » 04 Aug 2025, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, f'n a.....
Wouldn't take you long to name them.
Hence my invitation that you name them.DeezerShoove » 04 Aug 2025, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑ You said "no one cares".
I said "lots".
Who is closer to the truth, spineless?
If the city didn't reimburse them for legal expenses for the whole ordeal, then justice wasn't served for the mismanagement by the legal system that took them in the first place.*Huey » 03 Aug 2025, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑ And justice is served. This is a victory for all who wish to defend/protect their property.
The St. Louis couple who went viral in 2020 for wielding guns as Black Lives Matter protesters marched outside their property have regained possession of their semiautomatic rifle.
After a years long and complex legal struggle to reclaim their weapons after they were seized by authorities more than five years ago, police have returned the AR-15 to St. Louis lawyers Mark and Patricia McCloskey.
https://nypost.com/2025/08/03/us-news/s ... rontation/
Blackvegetable » 04 Aug 2025, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑ Hence my invitation that you name them.
Then we'll just have to agree on a definition of "lots"...
Blackvegetable » 04 Aug 2025, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑Hence my invitation that you name them.DeezerShoove » 04 Aug 2025, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑ You said "no one cares".
I said "lots".
Who is closer to the truth, spineless?
Then we'll just have to agree on a definition of "lots"...
*Huey » 04 Aug 2025, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑ You lied when you said no one cares. I was gonna let that go because as one with common sense I know what you mean. But, taking you literally you have found at least two people who care.
Using your rules, you lied.
Deezer » wrote:*Huey » 04 Aug 2025, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑ You lied when you said no one cares. I was gonna let that go because as one with common sense I know what you mean. But, taking you literally you have found at least two people who care.
Using your rules, you lied.
So, is he a hypocrite or a liar?
Not unless you can produce Coozie's list...*Huey » 04 Aug 2025, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑ You lied when you said no one cares. I was gonna let that go because as one with common sense I know what you mean. But, taking you literally you have found at least two people who care.
Using your rules, you lied.
Then perhaps you should butt out...unless you have a list..*Huey » 04 Aug 2025, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ That’s between you and him, sir. This is about your lie where you said NO ONE CARES.
Blackvegetable » 04 Aug 2025, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Then perhaps you should butt out...unless you have a list..
As written, or as fraudulently interpreted?*Huey » 04 Aug 2025, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑ No sir, with respect, this is my thread and you sir, are running from your also showed you are not a fan of the Constitution.
"Hence my invitation that you name them."??? Oh my!Blackvegetable » 04 Aug 2025, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑ Hence my invitation that you name them.
Then we'll just have to agree on a definition of "lots"...

Blackvegetable » 04 Aug 2025, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑A topic of zero consequence....an attempted distraction from "OrangeMan really sucks"..*Huey » 04 Aug 2025, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑ Looks like you lied again.
Your rule.
Mr Vegetable, it would behoove you to educate yourself on topics prior to flapping your gums. This is the second topic in five minutes where you face planted. Well, actually third is you count the BS concerning your post count from Friday.