Ok...but why the limits? Just like the "education" tax, it's already paid for.Vegas » 04 Aug 2025, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Absolutely maybe. Lol.
Only within limits. It's already been showed, through insurmountable research and data, we pay more into the current system than we would if we had Universal Healthcare. A lot more. The reason is because the uninsured are passing the costs off onto the insured. The hospitals have to cover the cost. This causes them to raise prices, which in return raises premiums. This also means that Medicaid and Medicare flip the cost which increases our taxes on top of the premium hikes. We pay a lot more.
However, universal healthcare would be a much different system in America than in any other country. The quality of healthcare would decrease noticeably. So, do we want to pay less for **** care, or indirectly pay more, due to the uninsured, but our quality of care remains the same.
I pick quality. So no free medical unless we can figure out a system where quality won't be sacrificed. ...
What is paid for? The hospitals?MR-7 » 04 Aug 2025, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Ok...but why the limits? Just like the "education" tax, it's already paid for.
Federal taxes fund public insurance programs, such as Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP, and military health insurance programs (Veteran's Health Administration, TRICARE).
MR-7 » 04 Aug 2025, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Federal taxes fund public insurance programs, such as Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP, and military health insurance programs (Veteran's Health Administration, TRICARE).
Ummmmm.....let's see. Who are student loans for?DeezerShoove » 04 Aug 2025, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑ Then what are student loans for? Who needs that money?
Vegas » 04 Aug 2025, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Ummmmm.....let's see. Who are student loans for?
Well, this is just a shot in the dark, but if I was to guess it would be for students.
Sorry. My bad. LolDeezerShoove » 04 Aug 2025, 3:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Total miss. Why loan money for free stuff?
Try to quit treating everyone like BlaVe.
Vegas » 04 Aug 2025, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Sorry. My bad. Lol
It's not free if our taxers paid for it. That is what the whole point of this is.