Liberal Forum

*Huey » 05 Aug 2025, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 1:55 pm

Sorry Mrs B, but I think you are confused on concerning what thread you are on.  This thread is about the democrats in the Texas Legislature.  You just posted something abot Republicans in the House in DC.

Please try harder to remember what thread you are on.

they got reasons,,, the democrats are trying to save the american people.

 

 

Huey » 05 Aug 2025, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 8:48 am

Blackvegetable » 04 Aug 2025, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2025, 12:23 pm

*Beekeeper » 04 Aug 2025, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2025, 11:52 am

That would be easy to prove since JURY VERDICTS are publicly available and usually online to view and post from.

Do you have that??

I have something even better....

The words of the presiding judge in response to your feeble protest..

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.

 He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Also, please note the jury instructions.  I understand that reading is not in your wheelhouse but it is the last sentence of the citation.

Verdict and aftermath (May 2023–present)

The jury reached a decision on May 9, 2023, after deliberating for less than three hours.[132] Considering the preponderance of the evidence, the jury delivered a verdict that first stated that Carroll had not proven that Trump raped her, and next stated that Carroll did prove that Trump was responsible for a lesser degree of sexual abuse,[133] and also stated that Trump defamed Carroll with false statements made with actual malice in the October 2022 Truth Social post; thus the jury awarded Carroll a total of $5 million in damages from Trump.[54][134][135] The judge had given the jury "the narrow, technical meaning" of the term rape under New York law as it existed at that time, defining rape as forcible penetration with the penis as alleged by Carroll.[136][137][138][139]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Jean_Carroll_v._Donald_J._Trump#Verdict_and_aftermath_(May_2023–present

As you continue to belabor the point you have lost DOZENS of times it out be pointed out that if the Judge wanted to use the COMMON definition of rape the **** would not have have given the definition of the strict and narrow NY Law in the Jury instructions, asshole.

So no, no JURY found him liable or guilty or rape.  You will be reminded of this every single **** time you rant about as a diversion.
 
@Blackvegetable  

Huey » 17 Feb 2026, 6:26 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2026, 6:26 pm

As you continue to belabor the point you have lost DOZENS of times it out be pointed out that if the Judge wanted to use the COMMON definition of rape the **** would not have have given the definition of the strict and narrow NY Law in the Jury instructions, asshole.

So no, no JURY found him liable or guilty or rape.  You will be reminded of this every single **** time you rant about as a diversion.
 
@Blackvegetable

You brainless little ****,

You've already made clear you don't "give a ****" about the facts...

For example, what Team Grifty argued in seeking a reduction in the award.

I cannot "lose" if I am consistent with the PRESIDING judge.

Until you can distinguish "finding" from "verdict", you need to quit yapping.

 

jerra b » 05 Aug 2025, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 2:27 pm

they got reasons,,, the democrats are trying to save the american people.

Ancestors own what they believe possible beyond their time alive in plain sight. Faith requires giving away biological time evolving to stand for ideas relative time logistic facts are more important than completely understanding now genetic outcomes only exist as eternally separated when just adapting to the moment here in series parallel time displaced since conception.

Every rule of law in every social ideology has the same rules of engagement to staying in character cradle to grave. Anyone being instinctively honest will face a court of law for insubordination, treason, blasphemy to the social consensus of their separate reality practiced for hundreds of generation gaps throughout history so far.

Blackvegetable » 17 Feb 2026, 6:37 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2026, 6:37 pm

You brainless little ****,

You've already made clear you don't "give a ****" about the facts...

For example, what Team Grifty argued in seeking a reduction in the award.

I cannot "lose" if I am consistent with the PRESIDING judge.

Until you can distinguish "finding" from "verdict", you need to quit yapping.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Meltdown achieved!

No, mental midget, I do give **** bout facts.  I don’t give  **** about your spin and diversionary, **** questions.  Remember, I post facts.

jerra b » 05 Aug 2025, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 2:27 pm

they got reasons,,, the democrats are trying to save the american people.

Protecting contextually typecast people isn't defending genetically displaced specific ancestors populating time in actually genetically spaced apart now.

Just the ideas governing 7 tomorrows a week as scheduled by clock and calendar methodology. What humanity does since dawn of civilization. Govern ancestries by power of suggesting living is more than time alive cradle to grave.

25% accurate day in until day. Life ancestrally progresses inception to conception of another generation gap. Combinations of multiple generation gaps alive same rotation of the planet, The previous ancestors die off one at a time same as arrived since conception. dead to decomposed a body still is inhabiting time since conception until cellular forms returns to their actual molecular content less the chromosomes they held since conception.

Life cycling in series parallel time living at one universal location when existed so far as genetic outcomes are current lifetimes left alive this rotation of the planet now.

Your social consensus doesn't accept the thermodynamic principles your own brain navigates 24/7. Your choices to believe life isn't self evident wasn't my fault. I was educated to believe nobody living can understand life beyond literal translation of who we became cradle to grave governing tomorrows by trial and error methodology every generation forward.

And here you are dying to stick to the scripture life exceeds time lived since conception as God's chosen people inherit the earth every election cycle.

Huey » 18 Feb 2026, 6:06 am » wrote: ↑

18 Feb 2026, 6:06 am

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Meltdown achieved!

No, mental midget, I do give **** bout facts.  I don’t give  **** about your spin and diversionary, **** questions.  Remember, I post facts.

:rofl:  

I do give **** bout facts

What did Team Grifty argue in its petition for relief? 

Blackvegetable » 18 Feb 2026, 6:12 am » wrote: ↑

18 Feb 2026, 6:12 am

 

What did Team Grifty argue in its petition for relief?

Bump


@Huey  
 

Blackvegetable » 18 Feb 2026, 6:12 am » wrote: ↑

18 Feb 2026, 6:12 am

:rofl:  



What did Team Grifty argue in its petition for relief? 

the end of time as your mind defines it doesn't work in real time adapting since conception. Ancestors are reclaiming their natural time alive without destroying methods that make living easier for all cradle to grave.

Capitalism creates equal opportunities, capitalizing off reasonable doubt sustains tyranny every generation forward one day at a time.

Staying in character humanity gave you by rule of law only screws yourself while your heart beats forward now.