Liberal Forum

*Huey » 05 Aug 2025, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 9:09 am

I serious doubt even he knows what it says.  He would be paying a small fortune on subscriptions considering the amount of pay wall links he supplies.

Or may be he does and that is why he drives a hooptie and lives in a duplex.

Your surmises tend to suffer under scrutiny, 0.16... 

Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2025, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 9:12 am

*Huey » 05 Aug 2025, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 9:09 am

I serious doubt even he knows what it says.  He would be paying a small fortune on subscriptions considering the amount of pay wall links he supplies.

Or may be he does and that is why he drives a hooptie and lives in a duplex.

Your surmises tend to suffer under scrutiny, 0.16... 

 

Tell me again you don't have, and never had, my address.  LMAO!

You leave out that is by choice.

*Huey » 05 Aug 2025, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 9:18 am

Tell me again you don't have, and never had, my address.  LMAO!

You leave out that is by choice.

That makes no sense..

You insisted you are 0.16.
 

 

 

 

Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2025, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 9:14 am

*Huey » 05 Aug 2025, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 9:06 am

Mr. Vegtable, Iamthoroughly enjoying this.  You are afraid of questions and you have no rebuttal.

Solo enjoyment is something with which you have a lot of practice.

 

Sir, I have made a detailed and factual argument.  You ?  Nada.  You keep from original argument that has been thoroughly destroyed.  

*Huey » 05 Aug 2025, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 9:19 am

Sir, I have made a detailed and factual argument.  You ?  Nada.  You keep from original argument that has been thoroughly destroyed.

You've offered a number of assertions, none of which you will defend.

I don't even know, or care, in the service of which muddled indefensible argument you do so.

Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2025, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 9:19 am

*Huey » 05 Aug 2025, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 9:18 am

Tell me again you don't have, and never had, my address.  LMAO!

You leave out that is by choice.

That makes no sense..

You insisted you are 0.16.
 

 

No sir, I never posted that.  You got that by looking up my address in google and then going to a real estate site.

My oh my, your dishonesty abounds.
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2025, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 9:23 am

You've offered a number of assertions, none of which you will defend.


 

                The hyp0corite is demanding someone to defend their argument, while he refuses to even defend one **** claim of his own since 2017. 

Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2025, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 9:23 am

*Huey » 05 Aug 2025, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 9:19 am

Sir, I have made a detailed and factual argument.  You ?  Nada.  You keep from original argument that has been thoroughly destroyed.

You've offered a number of assertions, none of which you will defend.

I don't even know, or care, in the service of which muddled indefensible argument you do so.

 

Every single assertion has been backed up by citations.  You sir, are not just a liar, you are a **** liar.    

Run, Mr ******, Run.

No sir, Warren Begers interpretation was not the interpretation of the Federal Government for 143 years.

 

*Huey » 05 Aug 2025, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 9:26 am

Every single assertion has been backed up by citations.  You sir, are not just a liar, you are a **** liar.    

Run, Mr ******, Run.

No sir, Warren Begers interpretation was not the interpretation of the Federal Government for 143 years.

Tiny,

You can assert endlessly....but if it isn't in service of an argument you will defend, it is meaningless. 

Now you've been sufficiently indulged.

Get over to your Confessions of a Victim thread...
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2025, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 9:32 am

*Huey » 05 Aug 2025, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 9:26 am

Every single assertion has been backed up by citations.  You sir, are not just a liar, you are a **** liar.    

Run, Mr ******, Run.

No sir, Warren Begers interpretation was not the interpretation of the Federal Government for 143 years.

Tiny,

You can assert endlessly....but if it isn't in service of an argument you will defend, it is meaningless. 

Now you've been sufficiently indulged.

Get over to your Confessions of a Victim thread...
 

 

I started no such thread.  I am standing reading to defend my proven assertions.  Just waiting on you, BOY. Bring I on Mr ****.  Show me what you got.  

ROG62 » 05 Aug 2025, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 8:57 am

If there's 2 openings, there is...

Like the way you can look in one of Trump's ears and see through to the other side?

I wish someone would get some fresh air in that cranium.

JohnnyYou » 05 Aug 2025, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 10:02 am

Like the way you can look in one of Trump's ears and see through to the other side?

I wish someone would get some fresh air in that cranium.

more like your ears...

now about your scan...


 
 

*Huey » 05 Aug 2025, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 9:09 am

I serious doubt even he knows what it says.  He would be paying a small fortune on subscriptions considering the amount of pay wall links he supplies.

Or may be he does and that is why he drives a hooptie and lives in a duplex.

that's right....priorities...

may not have a pot to piss in, yet always has enough for alcohol, drugs and heaters...oh, and don't forget the cell phone...
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2025, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 8:58 am

That's some weak ****, Rog...

Most offer a number of free stories every month.

you're wrong as per usual...
 

ROG62 » 05 Aug 2025, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 11:38 am

more like your ears...

now about your scan...

[url= postimages /][/url]

LOL.. That looks like your colonoscopy..  Or maybe Ghutto Butturds...

Blackvegetable » 04 Aug 2025, 7:44 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Aug 2025, 7:44 pm

You're a **** idiot...

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/08/us/r ... -loss.html

Hey FAKE NEWS Dickhead

I'm not the one always posting FAKE NEWS....you are

You just did it again posting a NYT link

See....you just can't help yourself....you are a FAKE NEWS Dickhead

*Huey » 05 Aug 2025, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 9:26 am

Every single assertion has been backed up by citations.  You sir, are not just a liar, you are a **** liar.    

Run, Mr ******, Run.

No sir, Warren Begers interpretation was not the interpretation of the Federal Government for 143 years.

No sir, Warren Begers interpretation was not the interpretation of the Federal Government for 143 years.

There would have been no need for Heller...

There would not be a boat full of crap on the Innertubes insisting that the opening words of the 2nd Amendment are there only for decoration.


 

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 7:15 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 7:15 am

There would have been no need for Heller...

There would not be a boat full of crap on the Innertubes insisting that the opening words of the 2nd Amendment are there only for decoration.

Mt Vegerable, as I stated earlier there was no Federal firearms legislature for 143 years FROM 1791 until 1934.   The reason there was a need for Heller was stated went **** crazy.  Next, Heller was not the US v. Heller, it DC v Heller.


Again, Sir, you are wading into topics you are not intellectually armed to understand.

*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 8:10 am

Mt Vegerable, as I stated earlier there was no Federal firearms legislature for 143 years FROM 1791 until 1934.   The reason there was a need for Heller was stated went **** crazy.  Next, Heller was not the US v. Heller, it DC v Heller.

Again, Sir, you are wading into topics you are not intellectually armed to understand.

There was DRACONIAN regulation at the local level.

Obviating the need for more global regs.


The Fraud is a series of **** lines of "reasoning". Gospel to witless ammosexuals and gold to those who make good money telling them what to think.


 

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 8:16 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 8:16 am

*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 8:10 am

Mt Vegerable, as I stated earlier there was no Federal firearms legislature for 143 years FROM 1791 until 1934.   The reason there was a need for Heller was stated went **** crazy.  Next, Heller was not the US v. Heller, it DC v Heller.

Again, Sir, you are wading into topics you are not intellectually armed to understand.

There was DRACONIAN regulation at the local level.

Obviating the need for more global regs.


The Fraud is a series of **** lines of "reasoning". Gospel to witless ammosexuals and gold to those who make good money telling them what to think.


 

 

Sorry, this is off topic.  My comments pertain to the Federal Government.  Heller was not about Federal Law.  

Nice try..