Liberal Forum

*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 9:37 am

I was not talking to you or about you.  El Presidenté, you were busted not paying attention and now claim a comment from long before you got banned elsewhere is a lie.

Damn, dude, you are one pitiful excuse for a man.  But, as I said, like a little lost poodle you will find me where ever I go on the forum

I don't need your approval. 

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2025, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 9:38 am

*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 9:37 am

I was not talking to you or about you.  El Presidenté, you were busted not paying attention and now claim a comment from long before you got banned elsewhere is a lie.

Damn, dude, you are one pitiful excuse for a man.  But, as I said, like a little lost poodle you will find me where ever I go on the forum

I don't need your approval. 

 

Yuo have taken too many hits the bong this morning, El Presidenté.  You are becoming more incoherent than usual.  All because you are afraid to admit you were wrong.  


 

*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 9:40 am

Yuo have taken too many hits the bong this morning, El Presidenté.  You are becoming more incoherent than usual.  All because you are afraid to admit you were wrong.

So why did you just melt down again, Moron Correction?

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2025, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 9:42 am

So why did you just melt down again, Moron Correction?

I forgot to do your numbers yesterday. Oh well. Hey, there is a search function now; you can get my examples with my definition.     

Vegas » 07 Aug 2025, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 9:48 am

I forgot to do your numbers yesterday. Oh well. Hey, there is a search function now; you can get my examples with my definition.   

Why can't you get them...

They're yours...
 

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2025, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 9:19 am

What if this narrative of "TinyBubbles Under Constant Threat" is, like all @*HooooeyVagina narratives, a steaming crock of ****?

Look, a certain amount of **** is ALWAYS gonna walk. 

If the portion of his **** that walks just happens to be injurious and annoying to you, so much the better. I celebrate that outcome. 

Now, go get your shine box. 
 

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2025, 5:55 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 5:55 am

Cannonpointer » 07 Aug 2025, 12:08 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 12:08 am

In fairness, you DID do the poodle shake when he was in striking distance.

You stayed away as fast as your tiny feet could remain stationary.   

I really needed to take a day out of my life to chase the Braintree Coward around Kenmore Square, before a Yankees game.

Thanks to the search function your lie is being exposed.  There is no mention of Braintree prior to 2024.  There is mention of you meeting being invited to meet me anywhere in Boston.

Mr. Vegetable I suggest you be careful who you call a liar.

Back to the subject...
 

*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 10:09 am

Thanks to the search function your lie is being exposed.  There is no mention of Braintree prior to 2024.  There is mention of you meeting being invited to meet me anywhere in Boston.

Mr. Vegetable I suggest you be careful who you call a liar.

Back to the subject...

Post my lie, and the name of the place where you got off the train to huddle.
 

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2025, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 10:11 am

*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 10:09 am

Thanks to the search function your lie is being exposed.  There is no mention of Braintree prior to 2024.  There is mention of you meeting being invited to meet me anywhere in Boston.

Mr. Vegetable I suggest you be careful who you call a liar.

Back to the subject...

Post my lie, and the name of the place where you got off the train to huddle.
 

 

No one asked you to go to Braintree.  Game.  Set.  Motherfker Match.  Braintree is irrelevant.  I was within 30 miles or so of your shantey for 5 straight days.  You huddled with a binky.

I need to say no more.

*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 10:12 am

No one asked you to go to Braintree.  

Post my lie, and the location where you stopped to huddle.

*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 10:09 am

Thanks to the search function your lie is being exposed.  There is no mention of Braintree prior to 2024.  There is mention of you meeting being invited to meet me anywhere in Boston.

Mr. Vegetable I suggest you be careful who you call a liar.

Back to the subject...

Uh oh.

The blackest day in that niggard's NHB life will be the reactivation of the search feature.   
 

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2025, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 10:14 am

*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 10:12 am

No one asked you to go to Braintree.  

Post my lie, and the location where you stopped to huddle.

 

Not until you post where you were asked to meet.  And also you did not know where I stayed until at least a year later, minimum.  Then I will be glad to answer. If not, carry with your tantrum:

*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 10:12 am

No one asked you to go to Braintree.  Game.  Set.  Motherfker Match.  Braintree is irrelevant.  I was within 30 miles or so of your shantey for 5 straight days.  You huddled with a binky.

I need to say no more.

The agreement was to meet in BOSTON, was it not? Anywhere in Boston - yes?

And you were there for a game - the red sox, if I am not mistaken?

Where is their stadium? I'm not a sports fan, so I have no ideer. Can you tell me?
 
 

*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 10:15 am

Not until you 

This is EXCLUSIVELY about relevant and objective facts...

One of which is that you don't have condition setting privileges. 

Cannonpointer » 07 Aug 2025, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 10:16 am

*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 10:12 am

No one asked you to go to Braintree.  Game.  Set.  Motherfker Match.  Braintree is irrelevant.  I was within 30 miles or so of your shantey for 5 straight days.  You huddled with a binky.

I need to say no more.

The agreement was to meet in BOSTON, was it not? Anywhere in Boston - yes?

And you were there for a game - the red sox, if I am not mistaken?

Where is their stadium? I'm not a sports fan, so I have no ideer. Can you tell me?
 
 

 

I was there for 5 days and caught two games.  Was in Boston each day.

I remember it was close to 90 and I think Jersey St was one of the cross streets.

 

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2025, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 10:04 am

Why can't you get them...

They're yours...

Why can't you learn to read... It's your brain. #6





Just for you: "**** you if you think I am going to define that for you.  Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up."

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors 

1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me
4. Continue with non-answers.
5. November, 2022.
6. Continue to lie about me posting my definition in my example, while he continues to refuse to read it.

 

Vegas » 07 Aug 2025, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 11:00 am

Why can't you learn to read... It's your brain. #6

Just for you: "**** you if you think I am going to define that for you.  Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up."

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Everyone's gonna think you're a liar.

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2025, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 1:02 pm

Everyone's gonna think you're a liar.

Just for you: "**** you if you think I am going to define that for you.  Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up."

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors 

1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me
4. Continue with non-answers.
5. November, 2022.
6. Continue to lie about me posting my definition in my example, while he continues to refuse to read it.

*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 10:21 am

I was there for 5 days and caught two games.  Was in Boston each day.

I remember it was close to 90 and I think Jersey St was one of the cross streets.

You should have gone directly to his home at the corner of Coward and Flee.  
 

*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 8:29 am

I'm sorry, I can't address that.  You deleted it again.  I told you how to do it. Oh wait, you disingenuously deleted that info also.  

My good goodness, sir, you are seriously lacking in skills.  You use such ignorant, rudimentary tactics.  Well, I am going to find some real topics to discuss.  I am sure you will follow like a lost puppy.

lol