Your torment is forever done the moment you post the rule.
If you run from your words, there's no point in reading them.
Yawn!Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2025, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑If you run from your words, there's no point in reading them.
Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2025, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Your torment is forever done the moment you post the rule.
The rule about questions.Vegas » 05 Aug 2025, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑ I have no rules. What rule? I am allowed to expose your cowardice all I want.
You haven't answered this:Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2025, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑ The rule about questions.
Acknowledge that you have been answered
1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video.
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me
4. Continue with non-answers.
5. November, 2022.
6. Continue to lie about me posting my definition in my example, while he continues to refuse to read it.
Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2025, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Tell your little buddy to get his waxed ****** over to the thread to tell his tale of victimhood.
This is no holds barredBlackvegetable » 05 Aug 2025, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑ The rule about questions.
Acknowledge that you have been answered
:rofl:
It is a syntactical mess...
Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2025, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑Tell your little buddy to get his waxed ****** over to the thread to tell his tale of victimhood.
1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video.
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me
4. Continue with non-answers.
5. November, 2022.
6. Continue to lie about me posting my definition in my example, while he continues to refuse to read it.
It's not a question...it is boatperson gibberish with one moment of clarity (cut and pasted, of course.)Vegas » 05 Aug 2025, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Speaking of you being a ****** who refuses to answer questions. Check this out:
Just for you: "**** you if you think I am going to define that for you. Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up."
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blah...blah...blah....Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2025, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑ It's not a question...it is boatperson gibberish with one moment of clarity (cut and pasted, of course.)
1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video.
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me
4. Continue with non-answers.
5. November, 2022.
6. Continue to lie about me posting my definition in my example, while he continues to refuse to read it.
#5Vegas » 05 Aug 2025, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Blah...blah...blah....
Just for you: "**** you if you think I am going to define that for you. Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up."
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
You're right. 5. But also 6 since #5 is lying about #6.
1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video.
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me
4. Continue with non-answers.
5. November, 2022.
6. Continue to lie about me posting my definition in my example, while he continues to refuse to read it.
Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2025, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑ It is a syntactical mess...
It's terrible, even for a first draft.
Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2025, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑It is a syntactical mess...
It's terrible, even for a first draft.
BuckNaked » 05 Aug 2025, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Syntactical" refers to the grammatical structure of language, specifically how words are arranged and combined to form phrases and sentences. It's related to the rules and principles that govern how sentences are constructed in a language.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
- Key Aspects of Syntax:
Syntax involves word order, grammatical relations, sentence structure, agreement, and the relationship between form and meaning.
- Examples:
Syntactical analysis can involve examining how words are ordered in a sentence, whether a sentence is grammatically correct, or how different grammatical structures convey different meanings.
- In Linguistics:
Syntax is a core area of linguistic study, concerned with how language users create meaningful sentences.
- Syntax vs. Syntactical:
Syntax is the study of how words combine, while "syntactical" is an adjective describing something related to syntax or grammar.