Liberal Forum

*Huey » 05 Aug 2025, 6:55 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 6:55 am

Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2025, 6:53 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 6:53 am

*Huey » 05 Aug 2025, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 6:51 am

Bv, here is a thread for you to make YOUR argument about tagging.

Controlly,

That is not how this will be done...
 


 

2nd time:

Sir, in the interest of full disclosure, as with many forum tools you learned it from me.  I did not abuse it.  YOU were tagging multiple 5-6 times a day.  On threads they were not participating.

Mr COntrolly, yo are in no position to make demands.  This will be a give and take.  YOU are not a lawyer or a judge.  You are 19th Century Russian Studies Major.
 

 

 

Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2025, 4:31 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 4:31 pm

*Huey » 05 Aug 2025, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 3:47 pm

Have done that 6 times today.  You could post your own.  But if you are looking for an answer tonite I am until tomorrow morning, as is my norm.

I hope you enjoy the evening. And has a word of caution don't hit the bong too hard this evening.   I need you to have a functioning memory tomorrow.

2nd time:

Sir, in the interest of full disclosure, as with many forum tools you learned it from me.  I did not abuse it.  YOU were tagging multiple 5-6 times a day.  On threads they were not participating.

Mr COntrolly, yo are in no position to make demands.  This will be a give and take.  YOU are not a lawyer or a judge.  You are 19th Century Russian Studies Major.

Is this it?

 

FIFY.  Your turn to tell your side.  1..2..3...

I do this in the interest of preventing you from **** up every single thread I go to with this ****.
 

*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 10:00 am

FIFY.  Your turn to tell your side.  1..2..3...

I do this in the interest of preventing you from **** up every single thread I go to with this ****.

Tiny,

I have no argument, or side.

You have complaints of "abusive practice", and are wearing the @* tunic.

You refuse to elaborate on the genesis of this matter....because you are a coward.
 

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 10:05 am

*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 10:00 am

FIFY.  Your turn to tell your side.  1..2..3...

I do this in the interest of preventing you from **** up every single thread I go to with this ****.

Tiny,

I have no argument, or side.

You have complaints of "abusive practice", and are wearing the @* tunic.

You refuse to elaborate on the genesis of this matter....because you are a coward.
 

 

You refuse to elaborate on the genesis of this matter....because you are a coward.

Mr. Little Feet, that means you do have side.  

I have elaborated on it.  But if you have no argument or side to present this thread, and YOUR THREAD are not necessary.

Have posted why I and OTHERS use the anti tag option. If you feel my presentation is not correct you have opportunity on this thread to present your SIDE of the record.  

If not, have a nice day and stop **** up other people threads with your temper tantrum, Sir.   

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 10:05 am

Tiny,

I have no argument, or side.

You have complaints of "abusive practice", and are wearing the @* tunic.

You refuse to elaborate on the genesis of this matter....because you are a coward.

I bet you still have room inside that empty head of yours for more people to move in, TOTALLY rent free!!!

Massive expansion and remodeling going on??
 

*Beekeeper » 06 Aug 2025, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 10:41 am

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 10:05 am

Tiny,

I have no argument, or side.

You have complaints of "abusive practice", and are wearing the @* tunic.

You refuse to elaborate on the genesis of this matter....because you are a coward.

I bet you still have room inside that empty head of yours for more people to move in, TOTALLY rent free!!!

Massive expansion and remodeling going on??
 

 

What is funny is, and he is not smart enough to get it, is he starts with claims he has no side or argument and ends by implying I am not telling the whole story, meaning he DOES have a side or argument.

*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 10:13 am

Mr. Little Feet, that means you do have side.  

I have elaborated on it.  But if you have no argument or side to present this thread, and YOUR THREAD are not necessary.

Have posted why I and OTHERS use the anti tag option. If you feel my presentation is not correct you have opportunity on this thread to present your SIDE of the record.  

If not, have a nice day and stop **** up other people threads with your temper tantrum, Sir.

Post your thread title.

You have provided no context whatsoever.

On the thread from which you are running, I am helping you remember...

*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 10:43 am

What is funny is, and he is not smart enough to get it, is he starts with claims he has no side or argument and ends by implying I am not telling the whole story, meaning he DOES have a side or argument.

Of course It's how malignant narcissists roll.

To him, it's all about "winning" at all costs, with all facts be damned. He'll present none, claim he did, blame you for not finding them, and then run to avoid being confronted in his lies.

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 10:05 am

*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 10:00 am

FIFY.  Your turn to tell your side.  1..2..3...

I do this in the interest of preventing you from **** up every single thread I go to with this ****.

Tiny,

I have no argument, or side.

You have complaints of "abusive practice", and are wearing the @* tunic.

You refuse to elaborate on the genesis of this matter....because you are a coward.
 

 

Below is yet another example of your abuse of the tagging feature.  While you would have at least 8 tags of me here you are  going after MR-7 to start **** on a thread in which he isn't participating.  

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 8:20 am

*Beekeeper » 06 Aug 2025, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 8:12 am

You really should change that Insulting others behavior and stop embarrassing yourself.

There is MORE than ample evidence to convict pencil neck. Which is unlike anything you thought you had against Trump.

Tell us how many "charges" against Trump were totally dismissed again. And how many are under appeal right now??

Schiff SIGNED an affidavit that the Maryland home was "his principal residence". His signature. He knew what it was and as an ATTORNEY he has zero excuses he can use like "it was a mistake" or "I didn't realize what it was". 

Now, if you can REBUTTAL with something, have at it. This post of yours isn't it.

Here's something for the road...

Share it with @MR-7  

Earlier this month, Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott, a Trump ally, added redistricting to the agenda for a special legislative session, citing concerns raised by Trump's Department of Justice that four existing, Democratic-leaning districts are unconstitutional.

https://www.npr.org/2025/07/30/nx-s1-54 ... sional-map
 

 

Mr. Vegetable, if you feel I am leaving something out, by all mean, stop hiding behind cowardice and post it.
 

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 10:49 am

*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 10:13 am

Mr. Little Feet, that means you do have side.  

I have elaborated on it.  But if you have no argument or side to present this thread, and YOUR THREAD are not necessary.

Have posted why I and OTHERS use the anti tag option. If you feel my presentation is not correct you have opportunity on this thread to present your SIDE of the record.  

If not, have a nice day and stop **** up other people threads with your temper tantrum, Sir.

Post your thread title.

You have provided no context whatsoever.

On the thread from which you are running, I am helping you remember...

 

Nope.  Mr.  Vegetable, My side has been posted to you at least 7 times.  I have nothing to add.  So by all means, post your side of the story or what you fee I am leaving out.  Remember, that is your argument, not mine.  TO quote my sainted Irish Grandmother, **** or get off the pot.

*Beekeeper » 06 Aug 2025, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 10:50 am

*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 10:43 am

What is funny is, and he is not smart enough to get it, is he starts with claims he has no side or argument and ends by implying I am not telling the whole story, meaning he DOES have a side or argument.

Of course It's how malignant narcissists roll.

To him, it's all about "winning" at all costs, with all facts be damned. He'll present none, claim he did, blame you for not finding them, and then run to avoid being confronted in his lies.

 

For him it is all about winning, for us it all about watching his whining.
 

*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 10:53 am

Nope.  Mr.  Vegetable, My side has been posted to you at least 7 times.  I have nothing to add.  So by all means, post your side of the story or what you fee I am leaving out.  Remember, that is your argument, not mine.  TO quote my sainted Irish Grandmother, **** or get off the pot.

You are now running from your own thread title.

I have nothing to add.  

You haven't explained WHY you felt compelled to introduce me to tags.

That, in lighi of your cries of "abuse", is a critical detail.

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 11:03 am

*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 10:53 am

Nope.  Mr.  Vegetable, My side has been posted to you at least 7 times.  I have nothing to add.  So by all means, post your side of the story or what you fee I am leaving out.  Remember, that is your argument, not mine.  TO quote my sainted Irish Grandmother, **** or get off the pot.

You are now running from your own thread title.

I have nothing to add.  

You haven't explained WHY you felt compelled to introduce me to tags.

That, in lighi of your cries of "abuse", is a critical detail.

 

I don't really care why I did.  I don't know why I did it.

If you feel it is a crucial detail you obviously have a side and and argument.  I have no clue what you are talking about.  This would be over much quicker if you just got to the point.  

*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 11:07 am

I don't really care why I did.  I don't know why I did it.

If you feel it is a crucial detail you obviously have a side and and argument.  I have no clue what you are talking about.  This would be over much quicker if you just got to the point.

Let's see if this helps..


You were convinced that Barr's decision to dismiss the case against Flynn was a direct hit at the Deep State. You were so giddy about it, you started threads in which you demanded I participate.

I had no interest in Flynn, and ignored you.

Then you proceeded to tag me, everywhere. For days.

So I gave you my attention.

And a block of cheese.

What followed is the subject of epics which will be passed through generations..

 

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 11:15 am

*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 11:07 am

I don't really care why I did.  I don't know why I did it.

If you feel it is a crucial detail you obviously have a side and and argument.  I have no clue what you are talking about.  This would be over much quicker if you just got to the point.

Let's see if this helps..


You were convinced that Barr's decision to dismiss the case against Flynn was a direct hit at the Deep State. You were so giddy about it, you started threads in which you demanded I participate.

I had no interest in Flynn, and ignored you.

Then you proceeded to tag me, everywhere. For days.

So I gave you my attention.

And a block of cheese.

What followed is the subject of epics which will be passed through generations..

 

 

That is not when you were introduced it. But if that is your story, run with it. The difference is after a couple of posts, I stopped.  YOU never did and to this bug the **** out f people on numerous topics.  

Now,you have the rest story.  Case closed.  You admit to abusing it.
 

*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 11:19 am

That is not when you were introduced it. But if that is your story, run with it. The difference is after a couple of posts, I stopped.  YOU never did and to this bug the **** out f people on numerous topics.  

Now,you have the rest story.  Case closed.  You admit to abusing it.

That is not when you were introduced it. But if that is your story, run with it.

We've gone from "I don't remember why."
It didn't happen that way....

The difference is after a couple of posts, I stopped.

But if it did.....


But that's not the reason you stopped....

You stopped doing it on that occasion because I accepted the challenge....and ANNIHILATED you and your chums...

YOU never did

Now your argument is that you did, but I did worse...

Which rings very hollow from a guy firing off notifications every 3.4 minutes for most of a day.

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 11:25 am

*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 11:19 am

That is not when you were introduced it. But if that is your story, run with it. The difference is after a couple of posts, I stopped.  YOU never did and to this bug the **** out f people on numerous topics.  

Now,you have the rest story.  Case closed.  You admit to abusing it.

That is not when you were introduced it. But if that is your story, run with it.

We've gone from "I don't remember why."
It didn't happen that way....

The difference is after a couple of posts, I stopped.

But if it did.....


But that's not the reason you stopped....

You stopped doing it on that occasion because I accepted the challenge....and ANNIHILATED you and your chums...

YOU never did

Now your argument is that you did, but I did worse...

Which rings very hollow from a guy firing off notifications every 3.4 minutes for most of a day.

 

Thanks for admitting I did it for a very short time and then stopped.  Come.  Set... **** match.


And no, you did not stomp me.  You did a lot of whining, question asking, and diverting.  But anyhow, that is in the past, this argument is over, and your point did not prevail, Sir.

*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 11:27 am

Thanks for admitting I did it for a very short time and then stopped.  Come.  Set... **** match.

And no, you did not stomp me.  You did a lot of whining, question asking, and diverting.  But anyhow, that is in the past, this argument is over, and your point did not prevail, Sir.

Tiny,

No interpretation.

I didn't say anything about whether you continued to use tags "abusively", only that you stopped in that tragic instance.

You can't even define your own words...
 

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 11:31 am

*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 11:27 am

Thanks for admitting I did it for a very short time and then stopped.  Come.  Set... **** match.

And no, you did not stomp me.  You did a lot of whining, question asking, and diverting.  But anyhow, that is in the past, this argument is over, and your point did not prevail, Sir.

Tiny,

No interpretation.

I didn't say anything about whether you continued to use tags "abusively", only that you stopped in that tragic instance.

You can't even define your own words...
 

 

We are done.  Yo presented your side, you admitted I did it for a short time on only a couple of threads, and then I stopped.  Such a trivial matter, Mr Vegetable, is consuming so much of your time.

My work is done here.

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 11:25 am

*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 11:19 am

That is not when you were introduced it. But if that is your story, run with it. The difference is after a couple of posts, I stopped.  YOU never did and to this bug the **** out f people on numerous topics.  

Now,you have the rest story.  Case closed.  You admit to abusing it.

That is not when you were introduced it. But if that is your story, run with it.

We've gone from "I don't remember why."
It didn't happen that way....

The difference is after a couple of posts, I stopped.

But if it did.....


But that's not the reason you stopped....

You stopped doing it on that occasion because I accepted the challenge....and ANNIHILATED you and your chums...

YOU never did

Now your argument is that you did, but I did worse...

Which rings very hollow from a guy firing off notifications every 3.4 minutes for most of a day.

 

 

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 11:31 am

*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 11:27 am

Thanks for admitting I did it for a very short time and then stopped.  Come.  Set... **** match.

And no, you did not stomp me.  You did a lot of whining, question asking, and diverting.  But anyhow, that is in the past, this argument is over, and your point did not prevail, Sir.

Tiny,

No interpretation.

I didn't say anything about whether you continued to use tags "abusively", only that you stopped in that tragic instance.

You can't even define your own words...
 

 

These are you words admitting I stopped doing it.

You stopped doing it on that occasion because I accepted the challenge....and ANNIHILATED you and your chums...

Mr. Vegetable, this is how a man with intestinal fortitude present the words of another.  A man does not take a partial quote, without a link and out of context and emotionally demand "Are these your words".  No sir, a gentleman post the words in context with asks and states "these are your words".

I am always glad to educate you on the finer points as necessary.  Remember there is no PG on this thread.  Also, I so your lame comment attempt at this a minute ago.  That would have been 12 attempts at tagging me.  A level I never reached in well under a day, if at all.

*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 11:46 am

These are you words admitting I stopped doing it.

Mr. Vegetable, this is how a man with intestinal fortitude present the words of another.  A man does not take a partial quote, without a link and out of context and emotionally demand "Are these your words".  No sir, a gentleman post the words in context with asks and states "these are your words".

I am always glad to educate you on the finer points as necessary.  Remember there is no PG on this thread.  Also, I so your lame comment attempt at this a minute ago.  That would have been 12 attempts at tagging me.  A level I never reached in well under a day, if at all.

Are these my words?

on that occasion