*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑ Thanks for admitting I did it for a very short time and then stopped. Come. Set... **** match.
And no, you did not stomp me. You did a lot of whining, question asking, and diverting. But anyhow, that is in the past, this argument is over, and your point did not prevail, Sir.
Not only did I tell you it was cheese, I told you why...And no, you did not stomp me. You did a lot of whining, question asking, and diverting. But anyhow, that is in the past
Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑ Thanks for admitting I did it for a very short time and then stopped. Come. Set... **** match.
And no, you did not stomp me. You did a lot of whining, question asking, and diverting. But anyhow, that is in the past, this argument is over, and your point did not prevail, Sir.Not only did I tell you it was cheese, I told you why...And no, you did not stomp me. You did a lot of whining, question asking, and diverting. But anyhow, that is in the past
Your recall sucks.
The way you use "melting down" it can be pistachio ice cream...*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑ I see that your meltdown is deepening on the other thread. You are not up to what would be 13 tags If I had not used the *.
every 3.5 minutes, 3.5...You are not up to what would be 13 tags If I had not used the *.
Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑The way you use "melting down" it can be pistachio ice cream...*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑ I see that your meltdown is deepening on the other thread. You are not up to what would be 13 tags If I had not used the *.every 3.5 minutes, 3.5...You are not up to what would be 13 tags If I had not used the *.
*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑
These are you words admitting I stopped doing it.
Mr. Vegetable, this is how a man with intestinal fortitude present the words of another. A man does not take a partial quote, without a link and out of context and emotionally demand "Are these your words". No sir, a gentleman post the words in context with asks and states "these are your words".
I am always glad to educate you on the finer points as necessary. Remember there is no PG on this thread. Also, I so your lame comment attempt at this a minute ago. That would have been 12 attempts at tagging me. A level I never reached in well under a day, if at all.
:rofl:I am always glad to educate you on the finer points as necessary. Remember there is no PG on this thread.
why is a tag different from any other notification, Abuser.Also, I so your lame comment attempt at this a minute ago. That would have been 12 attempts at tagging me. A level I never reached in well under a day, if at all.
Unless you post the number of notifications, you are omitting salient facts.*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑ And yet you still had 35 more posts than me last Friday, 130-95. LMAO!
I see you have another partial post with no link. No needful me to acknowledge it.
I have no idea what that rule is, or why.see you have another partial post with no link. No needful me to acknowledge it.
Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑Unless you post the number of notifications, you are omitting salient facts.*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑ And yet you still had 35 more posts than me last Friday, 130-95. LMAO!
I see you have another partial post with no link. No needful me to acknowledge it.
You know how you hate that.I have no idea what that rule is, or why.see you have another partial post with no link. No needful me to acknowledge it.
*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ There is no need. The forum tools do that for you. I stand by my numbers. If you think they are differently all means, post them.
As far as the rest of your effluvium that has been addressed and discussed. And remember, I can't make you do anything. Simply stating I do not respond to partial quotes that not in context and not linked. Simple as that. I am not telling you to stop doing it. But, I am not obliged to respond either.
The issue is not whether your incomplete data is false...it is whether it is relevant.I stand by my numbers. If you think they are differently all means, post them.
this crap has been addressedSimply stating I do not respond to partial quotes that not in context and not linked. Simple as that. I am not telling you to stop doing it. But, I am not obliged to respond either.
Unlike, I don't feel the need to answer every single post. Sometimes I answer multiple notifications with one post. So notification data is not relevant. If you feel it is relevant get to work.Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ There is no need. The forum tools do that for you. I stand by my numbers. If you think they are differently all means, post them.
As far as the rest of your effluvium that has been addressed and discussed. And remember, I can't make you do anything. Simply stating I do not respond to partial quotes that not in context and not linked. Simple as that. I am not telling you to stop doing it. But, I am not obliged to respond either.The issue is not whether your incomplete data is false...it is whether it is relevant.I stand by my numbers. If you think they are differently all means, post them.
Without notification data, it isn't.
With respect, that is not crap. You do that because you are attempting to falsely frame the discussion so you can control it. I don't play that game. In the interest honesty I am not participating in that game.Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ There is no need. The forum tools do that for you. I stand by my numbers. If you think they are differently all means, post them.
As far as the rest of your effluvium that has been addressed and discussed. And remember, I can't make you do anything. Simply stating I do not respond to partial quotes that not in context and not linked. Simple as that. I am not telling you to stop doing it. But, I am not obliged to respond either.The issue is not whether your incomplete data is false...it is whether it is relevant.I stand by my numbers. If you think they are differently all means, post them.
Without notification data, it isn't.this crap has been addressedSimply stating I do not respond to partial quotes that not in context and not linked. Simple as that. I am not telling you to stop doing it. But, I am not obliged to respond either.
That's nonsense.*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑ With respect, that is not crap. You do that because you are attempting to falsely frame the discussion so you can control it. I don't play that game. In the interest honesty I am not participating in that game.
Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑That's nonsense.*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑ With respect, that is not crap. You do that because you are attempting to falsely frame the discussion so you can control it. I don't play that game. In the interest honesty I am not participating in that game.
You try to do that all the time.
You were invited to share your story of abuse...
*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Sir, you have a tendency to be ambiguous with your points which is another reason you use out of context partial quotes with no Lins. I choose to post like a man meaning fun quotes, in context with with links. If you choose not to so be it, that is your choice. It also my choice not to respond. Next, Sir, your question privileges have bee suspended until further notice. SO asking me an unlinked, out of context partial quote is mine is meaningless.
This is a lie, Tiny..Sir, you have a tendency to be ambiguous with your points which is another reason you use out of context partial quotes with no Lins.
That isn't how a man does it....a man is direct...he doesn't post a pile of verbiage and then insist you figure out the point.I choose to post like a man meaning fun quotes, in context with with links.
Take the title of this thread, for example..*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑ With respect, that is not crap. You do that because you are attempting to falsely frame the discussion so you can control it. I don't play that game. In the interest honesty I am not participating in that game.
You even violated the rules of the forum in capitalizing "your".*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑ With respect, that is not crap. You do that because you are attempting to falsely frame the discussion so you can control it. I don't play that game. In the interest honesty I am not participating in that game.
Yes, that is how a man does it Sir. Over the years you have been now for your dishonestly and lack of a integrity, qualities real men possess. A real man presses reply, copies and pastes the portion he wants to discuss, and does not edit the quote. When you do that and you regain question privileges to answer any ON TOPIC questions. The ball is your court, weasel.Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 1:44 pm » wrote: ↑*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Sir, you have a tendency to be ambiguous with your points which is another reason you use out of context partial quotes with no Lins. I choose to post like a man meaning fun quotes, in context with with links. If you choose not to so be it, that is your choice. It also my choice not to respond. Next, Sir, your question privileges have bee suspended until further notice. SO asking me an unlinked, out of context partial quote is mine is meaningless.This is a lie, Tiny..Sir, you have a tendency to be ambiguous with your points which is another reason you use out of context partial quotes with no Lins.That isn't how a man does it....a man is direct...he doesn't post a pile of verbiage and then insist you figure out the point.I choose to post like a man meaning fun quotes, in context with with links.
He also doesn't make excuses to run from his words.
Sir, you are repeating yourself on **** that has already been covered.Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑Take the title of this thread, for example..*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑ With respect, that is not crap. You do that because you are attempting to falsely frame the discussion so you can control it. I don't play that game. In the interest honesty I am not participating in that game.
I'm not the one sporting the @* tunic insisting I'm a victim.
I'm not citing rules about the use of tags.
You are.
*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, that is how a man does it Sir. Over the years you have been now for your dishonestly and lack of a integrity, qualities real men possess. A real man presses reply, copies and pastes the portion he wants to discuss, and does not edit the quote. When you do that and you regain question privileges to answer any ON TOPIC questions. The ball is your court, weasel.
Sir, you are repeating yourself on **** that has already been covered.
Now, use this as another example of why your excuse notifications must be counted. They don't. I answered TWO notifications with OE **** post.
Also, If your recall, many nights you I get 6 to ten notifications. I don't answer many of them. Next, the reason you get so many notifications is because you seek them. You get a notification, for the MOST part, because you replied to someone else or you started which is begging for notifications. You also get notifications because you call people out.
It looks like YOU are claiming victimhood.
I am done with this thread. I got better things to post than respond to your whiny ****.. BV says "Sniffle...Sniffle...Snot bubble Tear....Huey won't do as I say...sniffle sniffle.."
Yo keep whining, Bitch.
Here's an actual example of what a man doesn't.Yes, that is how a man does it Sir. Over the years you have been now for your dishonestly and lack of a integrity, qualities real men possess

*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, that is how a man does it Sir. Over the years you have been now for your dishonestly and lack of a integrity, qualities real men possess. A real man presses reply, copies and pastes the portion he wants to discuss, and does not edit the quote. When you do that and you regain question privileges to answer any ON TOPIC questions. The ball is your court, weasel.
Sir, you are repeating yourself on **** that has already been covered.
Now, use this as another example of why your excuse notifications must be counted. They don't. I answered TWO notifications with OE **** post.
Also, If your recall, many nights you I get 6 to ten notifications. I don't answer many of them. Next, the reason you get so many notifications is because you seek them. You get a notification, for the MOST part, because you replied to someone else or you started which is begging for notifications. You also get notifications because you call people out.
It looks like YOU are claiming victimhood.
I am done with this thread. I got better things to post than respond to your whiny ****.. BV says "Sniffle...Sniffle...Snot bubble Tear....Huey won't do as I say...sniffle sniffle.."
Yo keep whining, Bitch.
Facts are facts, your **** notwithstanding.Sir, you are repeating yourself on **** that has already been covered.
This is yet more **** "logic"...Now, use this as another example of why your excuse notifications must be counted. They don't. I answered TWO notifications with OE **** post.
1 notification every 3.5 minutes for SEVEN hours.Also, If your recall, many nights you I get 6 to ten notifications.
Noone believes this.You get a notification, for the MOST part, because you replied to someone else or you started which is begging for notifications. You also get notifications because you call people out.
I already told you you're running from both threads, chased by your taunting words...I am done with this thread. I got better things to post than respond to your whiny ****.
Good Morning sir. Need post this here so you do not PG the facts I am about to post. You misinformation needs to be correct.Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 7:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Is everyone clear on the stomach turning hypocrisy of the alleged "victim"?
When his abusive practices were turned against him, he quickly donned the @* tunic and hit the curb for his chalk outline.
It is to puke.
Do you wear the @* tunic of an abuse victim, Confessed Abuser?*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 5:29 am » wrote: ↑
Good Morning sir. Need post this here so you do not PG the facts I am about to post. You misinformation needs to be correct.
There was no quickly about it. Remember, the Flynn argument of yours was years ago. It was only late last year or early this year that I figure out what the * will do.
Thank you for your time