Liberal Forum

The cowardice makes you wanna puke, don't it...

 

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 11:28 am

Speak, you prevaricating little dung beetle!

So, it isn't about "participation", it is about "ftequency"...

Is that correct?

in this post it says abusing I can’t get it to copy 



here it is 
That is not when you were introduced it. But if that is your story, run with it. The difference is after a couple of posts, I stopped.  YOU never did and to this bug the **** out f people on numerous topics.  

Now,you have the rest story.  Case closed.  You admit to abusing it.









 

BuckNaked » 06 Aug 2025, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 2:49 pm

in this post it says abusing I can’t get it to copy 

here it is 
That is not when you were introduced it. But if that is your story, run with it. The difference is after a couple of posts, I stopped.  YOU never did and to this bug the **** out f people on numerous topics.  

Now,you have the rest story.  Case closed.  You admit to abusing it.

The point, beefwit, is the specific character of this "abuse"....

Blackvegetable » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

18 minutes ago

The point, beefwit, is the specific character of this "abuse"....

Just for you: "**** you if you think I am going to define that for you.  Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up."

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors 

1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me
4. Continue with non-answers.
5. November, 2022.
6. Continue to lie about me posting my definition in my example, while he continues to refuse to read it. 

Is everyone clear on the stomach turning hypocrisy of the alleged "victim"?

When his abusive practices were turned against him, he quickly donned the @* tunic and hit the curb for his chalk outline.

It is to puke.
 

Have you figured it out now, @Buck Naked  ?

Blackvegetable » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

24 minutes ago

Have you figured it out now, @Buck Naked  ?

Just for you: "**** you if you think I am going to define that for you.  Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up."

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors 

1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me
4. Continue with non-answers.
5. November, 2022.
6. Continue to lie about me posting my definition in my example, while he continues to refuse to read it. 

Need more hints?

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2025, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 8:37 am

Have you figured it out now, @Buck Naked  ?

figured what out?   I didn’t know I needed to figure something out.   

BuckNaked » 07 Aug 2025, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 10:43 am

figured what out?   I didn’t know I needed to figure something out.

Story of your life.

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2025, 2:20 pm

The cowardice makes you wanna puke, don't it...

 

 

LMAO!  Says the guy hiding behind Peanut Gallery in call out thread.  Nah, your cowardice makes me laugh, Pepper Spray.

*Huey » 08 Aug 2025, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 11:33 am

LMAO!  Says the guy hiding behind Peanut Gallery in call out thread.  Nah, your cowardice makes me laugh, Pepper Spray.

Were you not afforded the opportunity to tell your tale of Victimhood?

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 11:38 am

*Huey » 08 Aug 2025, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 11:33 am

LMAO!  Says the guy hiding behind Peanut Gallery in call out thread.  Nah, your cowardice makes me laugh, Pepper Spray.

Were you not afforded the opportunity to tell your tale of Victimhood?

 

I started a thread you ran from where I did just that.  And I did not hide behind PG in my call out thread.  ;). There wa no need for another other than your disorder where you need to be in charge.  Remember, you posted this the original thread:

​​​​​

Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2025, 6:53 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 6:53 am

*Huey » 05 Aug 2025, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 6:51 am

Bv, here is a thread for you to make YOUR argument about tagging.

Controlly,

That is not how this will be done...
 

 

Acknowledge you were answered

*Huey » 08 Aug 2025, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 11:49 am

I started a thread you ran from where I did just that.  And I did not hide behind PG in my call out thread.  . There wa no need for another other than your disorder where you need to be in charge.  Remember, you posted this the original thread:

​​​​​

Acknowledge you were answered

You're lying.

You misrepresented me and then claimed an inability to recall the salient details.

Because you're a coward.
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 12:02 pm

*Huey » 08 Aug 2025, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 11:49 am

I started a thread you ran from where I did just that.  And I did not hide behind PG in my call out thread.  . There wa no need for another other than your disorder where you need to be in charge.  Remember, you posted this the original thread:

​​​​​

Acknowledge you were answered

You're lying.

You misrepresented me and then claimed an inability to recall the salient details.

Because you're a coward.
 

 

Well then, you didn't mention that. You simply were pissed that you did not have control. PLUS, you had every opportunity to correct the record without fear of PG.  Nope, you run so you could hide beside PG.  I will never participate in a call out thread where you use PG.  Your record is of one who is not to be trusted.  

*Huey » 08 Aug 2025, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 12:15 pm

Well then, you didn't mention that. You simply were pissed that you did not have control. PLUS, you had every opportunity to correct the record without fear of PG.  Nope, you run so you could hide beside PG.  I will never participate in a call out thread where you use PG.  Your record is of one who is not to be trusted.

I HAVE "mentioned" that....

You simply were pissed that you did not have control

That's more lying.

You lied in your title...you created the thread so you could frame the discussion.

I invited you to tell your story...

I will never participate in a call out thread where you use PG.  Your record is of one who is not to be trusted.

As I continue to demonstrate, you're a coward and chronic liar.

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 12:24 pm

*Huey » 08 Aug 2025, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 12:15 pm

Well then, you didn't mention that. You simply were pissed that you did not have control. PLUS, you had every opportunity to correct the record without fear of PG.  Nope, you run so you could hide beside PG.  I will never participate in a call out thread where you use PG.  Your record is of one who is not to be trusted.

I HAVE "mentioned" that....

You simply were pissed that you did not have control

That's more lying.

You lied in your title...you created the thread so you could frame the discussion.

I invited you to tell your story...

I will never participate in a call out thread where you use PG.  Your record is of one who is not to be trusted.

As I continue to demonstrate, you're a coward and chronic liar.

 

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Says the "man" hiding behind PG.

Your words, as a man would do it:

*Huey » 08 Aug 2025, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 11:49 am

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 11:38 am

*Huey » 08 Aug 2025, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 11:33 am

LMAO!  Says the guy hiding behind Peanut Gallery in call out thread.  Nah, your cowardice makes me laugh, Pepper Spray.

Were you not afforded the opportunity to tell your tale of Victimhood?


 

I started a thread you ran from where I did just that.  And I did not hide behind PG in my call out thread.  ;). There wa no need for another other than your disorder where you need to be in charge.  Remember, you posted this the original thread:

​​​​​

Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2025, 6:53 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 6:53 am

*Huey » 05 Aug 2025, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 6:51 am

Bv, here is a thread for you to make YOUR argument about tagging.

Controlly,

That is not how this will be done...
 


 

Acknowledge you were answered

 

 

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2025, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 10:16 am

Need more hints?

I guess so let’s have em 

Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2025, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 7:10 am

With respect to recent reports of abusive tagging practices, it would behoove us to begin with the victim's statement.

@*HooooeyVagina, 

Assuming these remain your words..

Please tell the assembled of how you taught the alleged perp about tags...

:rofl:  

Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2025, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 7:10 am

With respect to recent reports of abusive tagging practices, it would behoove us to begin with the victim's statement.

@*HooooeyVagina, 

Assuming these remain your words..

Please tell the assembled of how you taught the alleged perp about tags...

Bump