Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑Imbeciles like you put a rapist felon in the WH.DeezerShoove » 06 Aug 2025, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑ There isn't anything wrong with it.
Get rid of people that have no ethical or moral values.
Lots of stuff would run better if that feature of human nature were toned down.
Progs like that reasoning: "It just doesn't have to be this way."
Post this false claim, or admit that you're a lying coward.*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ This thread is not about your false clam about Tump. This is about the electoral college. Go start a thread.
Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Post this false claim, or admit that you're a lying coward.
Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑Post this false claim, or admit that you're a lying coward.*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ This thread is not about your false clam about Tump. This is about the electoral college. Go start a thread.
Hall Monitoring Little Bishy,*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Mr. Vegetable, I am here to discuss the Electoral College. If you wish that we did yesterday. Have fun.
As far as the EC it is needed. Unlike you Have lived in numerous and diverse areas the country. Each have their unique needs that differ. Cities are different than rural. Suburds are different than farm land. And each needs to have a voice.
Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑Hall Monitoring Little Bishy,*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Mr. Vegetable, I am here to discuss the Electoral College. If you wish that we did yesterday. Have fun.
As far as the EC it is needed. Unlike you Have lived in numerous and diverse areas the country. Each have their unique needs that differ. Cities are different than rural. Suburds are different than farm land. And each needs to have a voice.
Stop trying to control and direct debate.
Unless you will explain the point of OPs when asked.
Then stop making every thread about your resentment at my superiority.*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Sir, I am not interested in your takeover of the thread. Leaving the Electoral College in favor of majority vote is a bad idea. It would lead to serious succession movements.
LMAO!Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑Then stop making every thread about your resentment at my superiority.*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Sir, I am not interested in your takeover of the thread. Leaving the Electoral College in favor of majority vote is a bad idea. It would lead to serious succession movements.
The EC is a barbaric relic, and a sop to stupid states..
Where is the argument in favor of the EC, Tiny?*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑ LMAO!
Changing from the EC would require a Constitutional amendment. Good luck getting 38 states to sign on to that. Many states that are not coastal or urban are going to laugh at that.
And Mr Vegetable, I suggest you take your case on the road and get the support of grass roots effert for convention to propose amendments to the constitution. Got to states with big rural, ranching and farming areas. Because without a couple of them your amendment ain't gonna pass. Do it in purposes. State your case to them.
Tell them they are stupid. But, we Sir, you are not that kinda man. You are big and bad behind anonymity, not in person.
Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑Where is the argument in favor of the EC, Tiny?*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑ LMAO!
Changing from the EC would require a Constitutional amendment. Good luck getting 38 states to sign on to that. Many states that are not coastal or urban are going to laugh at that.
And Mr Vegetable, I suggest you take your case on the road and get the support of grass roots effert for convention to propose amendments to the constitution. Got to states with big rural, ranching and farming areas. Because without a couple of them your amendment ain't gonna pass. Do it in purposes. State your case to them.
Tell them they are stupid. But, we Sir, you are not that kinda man. You are big and bad behind anonymity, not in person.
Stick to the topic, Whinnie...*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Sorry Sir, that is a question. You don't get questions until you agree to some conditions.
My stand on the EC s quite clear. It was made prior to your attempted take over. No, I am not going to repost for you and rather posts from you demanding it will be ignored.
Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2025, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑Stick to the topic, Whinnie...*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Sorry Sir, that is a question. You don't get questions until you agree to some conditions.
My stand on the EC s quite clear. It was made prior to your attempted take over. No, I am not going to repost for you and rather posts from you demanding it will be ignored.
Or just bow out...
Actually, it's a more accurate barometer of the entire country's sentiment. Why should the sardines attracted to the urban blight have any more say than the people in rural counties...you say it's less democratic, I say its more.Vegas » 06 Aug 2025, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑ Ehhhhhh....I don't know about that. Counties are not people. Some counties have millions of people, such as Los Angeles County. Others have just a few thousand or hundreds. Under this proposal, a small rural county would have the same power as a massive urban one. That’s even less democratic than the Electoral College and drastically reduces the influence of voters in densely populated areas.
*Huey » 06 Aug 2025, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm good sir. I have been on topic since before you arrived. Mr. Vegtable, with respect, I don't wish to stop you from your OPINIONS, but if this is all you got I will bow out of further conversation on this with you.
By all means, educate us on the EC.
why do you keep yapping?but if this is all you got I will bow out of further conversation on this with you. By all means, educate us on the EC.
But democracy is supposed to be about people, not places. A “county count” system treats a county with 200 people the same as one with 2 million. That’s not giving everyone a voice, it’s giving land a voice.RebelGator » 06 Aug 2025, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Actually, it's a more accurate barometer of the entire country's sentiment. Why should the sardines attracted to the urban blight have any more say than the people in rural counties...you say it's less democratic, I say its more.
Probably because you're so stupid, it needs to be hammered into your head, like a nail into a post.
RebelGator » 06 Aug 2025, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Probably because you're so stupid, it needs to be hammered into your head, like a nail into a post.