Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Scott Bessent, Porch Pansy...
Scott Bessent, Porch Pansy...
By Blackvegetable
7 Aug 2025 10:52 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
13 Aug 2025 6:29 am
No.
You're now DISMISSED. For the 100th time!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
13 Aug 2025 6:38 am
And yet Grifty is cutting a check for 2.million...
13 Aug 2025 6:39 am
Really??
Link.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
13 Aug 2025 6:42 am
Yeah, really...
Nod.
13 Aug 2025 7:12 am
Nope. Really.
SUPREME COURT hasn't ruled and will in due course.
NOD!!
!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
13 Aug 2025 7:15 am
He couldn't even get en banc at the Appeals court.*Beekeeper » 13 Aug 2025, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑ Nope. Really.
SUPREME COURT hasn't ruled and will in due course.
NOD!!
Oops!!
Why would SCOTUS waste its time?
13 Aug 2025 7:20 am
Blackvegetable » 13 Aug 2025, 7:15 am » wrote: ↑ He couldn't even get en banc at the Appeals court.
Why would SCOTUS waste its time?
You just answered the "Why"!!
Because the Appeals court refused an En Banc!! MORE than enough reason to hear the case.
!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
13 Aug 2025 7:23 am
That's not how it works.*Beekeeper » 13 Aug 2025, 7:20 am » wrote: ↑ You just answered the "Why"!!
Because the Appeals court refused an En Banc!! MORE than enough reason to hear the case.
Oops!!
13 Aug 2025 7:25 am
**** you up your greasy lying *** traitor ***. There's a wall waiting for you, ***.
13 Aug 2025 9:51 am
13 Aug 2025 9:53 am
when?
13 Aug 2025 9:56 am
Not for being found liable for rape. Ask ABC.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
13 Aug 2025 10:06 am
then for what?
13 Aug 2025 10:07 am
It is EXACTLY why he is paying 2 million dollars..
As Judge Kaplan patiently explained to Team Grifty.
You should read it....not that it will do much good, but on principle.
13 Aug 2025 10:08 am
When he does, it will be with interest...
13 Aug 2025 10:09 am
mkay you notify us when that check clears
13 Aug 2025 10:15 am
Why?
For years, a local coward responded to a flood of referrals and grand jury indictments with
"Get back to me when you get a conviction."
Then I got back to him with 34 counts.
Guess what said sniveling little REMFcuck did..
13 Aug 2025 10:20 am
I don’t know what did he say?Blackvegetable » 13 Aug 2025, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑ Why?
For years, a local coward responded to a flood of referrals and grand jury indictments with
"Get back to me when you get a conviction."
Then I got back to him with 34 counts.
Guess what said sniveling little REMFcuck did..
13 Aug 2025 10:25 am
"Gotta run!"
13 Aug 2025 11:05 am
f you have forgotten the breakdown of payment you can find it right here:Buck » wrote:
then for what?
https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/appeals ... se-7367226
Wasn't for rape.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Who is online
In total there are 9848 users online :: 13 registered, 18 bots, and 9817 guests
Registered users: Vegas, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Squatchman, ROG62, RebelGator, Beekeeper, jerra b, LowIQTrash, nefarious101, sole, Huey, Fuelman
Bots: okhttp, MicroMessenger, DuckDuckBot, Bolt, Not, DuckDuckGo, NING, proximic, ADmantX, YandexBot, Googlebot, facebookexternalhit, curl/7, CriteoBot, Baiduspider, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, bingbot