Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 13 Aug 2025, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 10:07 am

*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 9:56 am

Not for being found liable for rape.  Ask ABC.

It is EXACTLY why he is paying 2 million dollars..

As Judge Kaplan patiently explained to Team Grifty.

You should read it....not that it will do much good, but on principle.
 

 

Nope, not for rape.

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/appeals ... se-7367226

Blackvegetable » 13 Aug 2025, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 10:25 am

"Gotta run!"

cmon man 

Blackvegetable » 13 Aug 2025, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 10:15 am

BuckNaked » 13 Aug 2025, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 10:09 am

mkay you notify us when that check clears

Why?

For years, a local coward responded to a flood of referrals and grand jury indictments with

"Get back to me when you get a conviction."

Then I got back to him with 34 counts.

Guess what said sniveling little REMFcuck did..
 

 

Somebody is really butt hurt on melting down.

There really isn't much sting to it when a cubicle boy, who was going to run off to college if drafted, calls me a REMF.  There ain't anything more REMF than that.  

*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 11:22 am

Somebody is really butt hurt on melting down.

There really isn't much sting to it when a cubicle boy, who was going to run off to college if drafted, calls me a REMF.  There ain't anything more REMF than that.

Hhhhhmmmmmm REMF?

*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 11:22 am

Somebody is really butt hurt on melting down.

There really isn't much sting to it when a cubicle boy, who was going to run off to college if drafted, calls me a REMF.  There ain't anything more REMF than that.

Of course. You feel very strongly about your sacrifice. 
But you don't dispute the facts..

*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 11:06 am

Nope, not for rape.

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/appeals ... se-7367226

Tiny,

Read the judge's words...pay very close attention to what he says about the difference between Finding and Verdict...






 

BuckNaked » 13 Aug 2025, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 11:24 am

Hhhhhmmmmmm REMF?

You can tell by the reflexive reaction.

Blackvegetable » 13 Aug 2025, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 11:28 am

Tiny,

Read the judge's words...pay very close attention to what he says about the difference between Finding and Verdict...

Read your words in your definition and answer: 



Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors  

Blackvegetable » 13 Aug 2025, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 11:25 am

*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 11:22 am

Somebody is really butt hurt on melting down.

There really isn't much sting to it when a cubicle boy, who was going to run off to college if drafted, calls me a REMF.  There ain't anything more REMF than that.

Of course. You feel very strongly about your sacrifice. 
But you don't dispute the facts..

 

I don't look at it as a sacrifice.  

The facts are you chose to avoid military service, to the point you would run to Canada if need be.  SO you calling anyone a REMF is ludicrous, ROTC.  

And you only bring up REMF or mention my service, (you talk about it more than I do) when you are seriously getting your *** beat and are melting down.

Blackvegetable » 13 Aug 2025, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 11:28 am

*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 11:06 am

Nope, not for rape.

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/appeals ... se-7367226

Tiny,

Read the judge's words...pay very close attention to what he says about the difference between Finding and Verdict...






 

 

This is done. Been over for quite some time.  Again, give your legal expertise to ABC.  They have 16 million reasons to say to your face you are full of ****.

Until you produce a Jury Verdict Forum that either convected of rape of found him liable for it, you are lying.

I am done until then.

*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 11:29 am

I don't look at it as a sacrifice.  

The facts are you chose to avoid military service, to the point you would run to Canada if need be.  SO you calling anyone a REMF is ludicrous, ROTC.  

And you only bring up REMF or mention my service, (you talk about it more than I do) when you are seriously getting your *** beat and are melting down.

The Record contradicts you.

And you only bring up REMF or mention my service, (you talk about it more than I do) when you are seriously getting your *** beat and are melting down.

More narrative...

These assertions never hold up under scrutiny. 

Blackvegetable » 13 Aug 2025, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 11:32 am

*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 11:29 am

I don't look at it as a sacrifice.  

The facts are you chose to avoid military service, to the point you would run to Canada if need be.  SO you calling anyone a REMF is ludicrous, ROTC.  

And you only bring up REMF or mention my service, (you talk about it more than I do) when you are seriously getting your *** beat and are melting down.

The Record contradicts you.

And you only bring up REMF or mention my service, (you talk about it more than I do) when you are seriously getting your *** beat and are melting down.

More narrative...

These assertions never hold up under scrutiny. 

 

LMAO!  

*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 11:31 am

This is done. Been over for quite some time.  Again, give your legal expertise to ABC.  They have 16 million reasons to say to your face you are full of ****.

Until you produce a Jury Verdict Forum that either convected of rape of found him liable for it, you are lying.

I am done until then.

Yes, it has.  I had it right the first time.

You still can't figure up from down.

They have 16 million reasons to say to your face you are full of ****. 

 A).post what they said

B) post the verdict in that case


So **** g'ddammned stupid 




 

Blackvegetable » 13 Aug 2025, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 11:34 am

*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 11:31 am

This is done. Been over for quite some time.  Again, give your legal expertise to ABC.  They have 16 million reasons to say to your face you are full of ****.

Until you produce a Jury Verdict Forum that either convected of rape of found him liable for it, you are lying.

I am done until then.

Yes, it has.  I had it right the first time.

You still can't figure up from down.

They have 16 million reasons to say to your face you are full of ****. 

 A).post what they said

B) post the verdict in that case


So **** g'ddammned stupid 




 

 

A). I have posted what they said.  If you forgot do your won research.

B). I have posted the verdict.  

Bye.  Oh, you have unanswered questions on another thread that came before this.

*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 11:35 am

A). I have posted what they said.  If you forgot do your won research.

B). I have posted the verdict.  

Bye.  Oh, you have unanswered questions on another thread that came before this.

Look at this lying asshole..


 

*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 11:32 am

LMAO!

Never, @*


 

Blackvegetable » 13 Aug 2025, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 11:28 am

You can tell by the reflexive reaction.

oh yea 


In a military context, REMF is an acronym that stands for Rear Echelon Mother Fer*. It's a derogatory term used to describe military personnel who are not in a combat role, especially those stationed far from the front lines and involved in support or administrative functions. The term is often used by combat troops to express disdain or resentment towards those perceived as having an easier time or being less involved in the actual fighting. 
While the term is often used informally among service members, it's important to be aware that it can be offensive, especially when directed at individuals. Some individuals who are not in combat roles may still perform crucial functions that support the war effort and contribute to the overall success of military operations. 
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Aug 2025, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 11:43 am

Look at this lying asshole..

answer the multiple choice choice question 

Blackvegetable » 13 Aug 2025, 7:23 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 7:23 am

That's not how it works.

If you're as smart as you think you are, then give it up!!

Nice try, but that IS how it works!! When DENIED by one court, it doesn't STOP THERE, it can go all the way to the SCOTUS for any reason. INCLUDIND a denial to hear by another lower court.

Be stupid if you want, but I won't agree with you because that makes BOTH OF US WRONG!!

*Beekeeper » 13 Aug 2025, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 2:07 pm

If you're as smart as you think you are, then give it up!!

Nice try, but that IS how it works!! When DENIED by one court, it doesn't STOP THERE, it can go all the way to the SCOTUS for any reason. INCLUDIND a denial to hear by another lower court.

Be stupid if you want, but I won't agree with you because that makes BOTH OF US WRONG!!

The case won't be retried at SCOTUS.

If heard, the only hope Grifty has is for a procedural error...