*Huey » 15 Aug 2025, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑ A few of us did that a few years ago. Went weeks without responding to him. He hated it.
I think it's more like @*HooooeyVagina - Fabulist.*Beekeeper » 15 Aug 2025, 1:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Yep. That's the @Blackvegetable malignant narcissist!!
Unless the universe revolves around him, he ain't happy!!
Blackvegetable » 15 Aug 2025, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑ I think it's more like @*HooooeyVagina - Fabulist.
None of her narratives stand up to scrutiny.
And no, *******. I am not going to go over it. Inform yourself.Vegas » 15 Aug 2025, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegetable » 15 Aug 2025, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑ I think it's more like @*HooooeyVagina - Fabulist.
None of her narratives stand up to scrutiny.
Copies me again. Thereby proving he has no thoughts of his own.Blackvegetable » 15 Aug 2025, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑ And no, *******. I am not going to go over it. Inform yourself.
Blahahahaha cmon man answer it @BlackvegetableVegas » 15 Aug 2025, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
He is recycling his old deflections. He has nothing else.
You've copied my definition of Survivorship bias because you have none of your own.Vegas » 15 Aug 2025, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Copies me again. Thereby proving he has no thoughts of his own.![]()
![]()
The evidence keeps piling up.
Blackvegetable » 15 Aug 2025, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑ You've copied my definition of Survivorship bias because you have none of your own.
Blackvegetable » 15 Aug 2025, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑ You've copied my definition of Survivorship bias because you have none of your own.
I guess your right.. Epstein and Trump were Democrats at the time.Cannonpointer » 15 Aug 2025, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑ Why in the world would I do that?
You have defended, downplayed, distracted, etc. on behalf of child rapists. You are a willing purveyor of children's innocence. **** you where you eat your dinner, boy.
Everything coming out of your mouth is lies, and everything going into it is *** dicks.
Nahh.. your left tit ain't my type.The right one deserves to be in a mental institution.
You could not define coservative with a gun to your melon.JohnnyYou » 15 Aug 2025, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑ I guess your right.. Epstein and Trump were Democrats at the time.
Your attack on democrats is unfounded with out recognition that sex abuse is a conservative trait.. Pretty much all malevolance is..
Yin Yang.. Everyone has conservative and liberal in themselves. Some are fortunate to balance it.Cannonpointer » 15 Aug 2025, 6:33 pm » wrote: ↑ You could not define coservative with a gun to your melon.
Just to wake your stupid *** up, we do not have a conservative party. We do not have a liberal party.
We have a neoconservative party that is neoliberal, and we have a neoliberal party that is neoconservative.
And neither is more evil than the other, you retard. The are both hanging from the same strings.
Huey » 12 Aug 2025, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑1. The track, 8 days out, showed Dorian crossing FL Over Lake Okachobee, and heading NW into the Gulf. Further discussion can be done on the threading question. This is not the only example of your inability to read a map.Blackvegetable » 12 Aug 2025, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑No....I post the indisputable evidence of your cluelessness as a general example of your cluelessness....as I have patiently explained on at least 20 occasions.*Huey » 12 Aug 2025, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑ I am not hiding. YOU are running from the actual thread where the discussion occurred.
This matter, like the matter of the E. Jean. Carroll case, and the origins of the AR-15 and NATO 5.56 round, has long since been resolved.
Grifty made a bunch of **** up and then had his flunkies cover his ***.
2. In the Carroll Case, Trump was not found liable for rape. End of story.
3. You ignorance concerning 5.56, the M 16, and the Colt AR 15 Sporter is one of your biggest embarrassments on this forum. When you are man enough and answer this honestly it will be done:
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
What has always pissed you off, why you troll me, and never shut the **** up, chasing me from thread to thread, is because you think you are superior but you know I kick your *** often and you can't handle that. You are not man enough to admit when you are wrong. And remember, it also burns your *** that 8 years ago you failed in your primary goal. It was to kick me, and others off this forum so YOU could find a new home. We sent your loser rejects back to where they came from. YOU WERE BANNED there so you couldn't go back it, not to mention you were banned from the other forums you tried.
And I love stringing you along. You make it to **** easy.
Per your request.....Blackvegetable » 04 Jan 2026, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑Describe what you seeHuey » 04 Jan 2026, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑
FIFY. I am going where the evidence leads.
1. The PM was sent to years ago.
.
So, you missed the Sharpie, but have a debunked lie to cling to.
Blackvegetable » 04 Jan 2026, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑So, you missed the Sharpie, but have a debunked lie to cling to.
See why I don't bother?
Watch, lying little ****...Huey » 04 Jan 2026, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑ You area either a liar or you are in the early stages of Alkzheimers.
And you do bother. You chase me around like a lost little puppy. Yes, what I posted explains what I see.
8 days out that was the track.
Huey » 04 Jan 2026, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 04 Jan 2026, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑So, you missed the Sharpie, but have a debunked lie to cling to.
See why I don't bother?
You area either a liar or you are in the early stages of Alkzheimers.
And you do bother. You chase me around like a lost little puppy. Yes, what I posted explains what I see.
8 days out that was the track. No matter how much you lie about. Next time you ask you will again will be pointed ot one of the many posts where you were answered.
Are you going to answer questions on a one for one basis? If not, we will do this point/counter point.Blackvegetable » 04 Jan 2026, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑Watch, lying little ****...Huey » 04 Jan 2026, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑ You area either a liar or you are in the early stages of Alkzheimers.
And you do bother. You chase me around like a lost little puppy. Yes, what I posted explains what I see.
8 days out that was the track.
What was actually predicted for Alabama, according to that defaced map?