Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 6:05 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 6:05 am

You're a **** idiot.

Bessent knows damn well that bls data isn't "politicized", and he fully understands that undermining faith in federal reporting is destructive.

Grifty doesn't understand the critical importance this data plays in capital markets, because he's an idiot who sells meme coins.

And you, who have never invested a dime, should shut the **** up.

Pssst. Let's see who's the "idiot" here.

As a FYI, Treasury has NOTHING do so with the BLS. That would be the LABOR Department. That makes YOU the idiot here.

And yes, the BLS stats have been POLITICIZED for over a decade. Unless you can PROVE that they haven't been, seeing how YOU made the claim they weren't, you lose.

And trust me, Trump and Bessent full well know that ACCURATE DATA is important. It's why having 3 months of "adjusted data" being needed ROILS markets and financial planning in HORRIBLE ways. It's WHY he want's data to be NON-POLITICAL and what was coming out of the BLS was FAR from accurate.

You selling blow jobs isn't stupid?? Or is that just another of your "entrepreneurial skills" hard at work?? Pet rocks was stupid too, but they are still selling and the guy who "memed" them made a fortune. So did the inventor of the Hula-hoop, and quite few other "loser' things too. I can recall the CEO of IBM saying that "hardware" was the future of the computer business, not software". And some little 25-year-old kid out in California made the OPERATING SYSTEM from IBM and became a BILLIONAIRE in no time. IBM no longer makes computers either. So who was "stupid" here??
 
 

*Beekeeper » 08 Aug 2025, 6:21 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 6:21 am

Pssst. Let's see who's the "idiot" here.

As a FYI, Treasury has NOTHING do so with the BLS. That would be the COMMERCE Department. That makes YOU the idiot here.

And yes, the BLS stats have been POLITICIZED for over a decade. Unless you can PROVE that they haven't been, seeing how YOUR made the claim they weren't, you lose.

And trust me, Trump and Bessent full well know that ACCURATE DATA is important. It's why having 3 months of "adjusted data" being needed ROILS markets and financial planning in HORRIBLE ways. It's WHY he want's data to be NON-POLITICAL and what was coming out of the BLS was FAR from accurate.

You selling blow jobs isn't stupid?? Or is that just another of your "entrepreneurial skills" hard at work?? Pet rocks was stupid too, but they are still selling and the guy who "memed" them made a fortune. So did the inventor of the Hula-hoop, and quite few other "loser' things too. I can recall the CEO of IBM saying that "hardware" was the future of the computer business, not software". And some little 25-year-old kid out in California made the OPERATING SYSTEM from IBM and became a BILLIONAIRE in no time. IBM no longer makes computers either. So who was "stupid" here??

As a FYI, Treasury has NOTHING do so with the BLS. That would be the COMMERCE Department. That makes YOU the idiot here.

What point are you trying to make?
That Bessent WOULDN'T know?

And yes, the BLS stats have been POLITICIZED for over a decade. Unless you can PROVE that they haven't been, seeing how YOUR made the claim they weren't, you lose.

Show me your evidence. 

**** idiot.

And trust me, Trump and Bessent full well know that ACCURATE DATA is important. It's why having 3 months of "adjusted data" being needed ROILS markets 

 You're a **** idiot...EVERYONE knows the data is revised in following months, and why.

Except you and the First Felon.

Because you're morons.

You selling blow jobs isn't stupid??

We've established that you're an idiot.

 

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 6:31 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 6:31 am

What point are you trying to make?
That Bessent WOULDN'T know?

Show me your evidence. 

**** idiot.

 You're a **** idiot...EVERYONE knows the data is revised in following months, and why.

Except you and the First Felon.

Because you're morons.

We've established that you're an idiot.

1. YOU said it wasn't politicized. PROVE IT!! YOUR CLAIM, you need the evidence. Otherwise, your claim is dismissed without evidence. Hitchen's Razor.

2. No. Only a malignant narcissist thinks like that. Without any EVIDENCE, you are dismissed. And if the DATA was CORRECT in the month it was issued, there would be NO REASON to "adjust" it. THAT'S THE REAL PROBLEM, boy.

3, Boo hoo. YOU LOST. America saw what it was all about with the lawfare. WE have the evidence now. Watch how it plays out and you can boo hoo some more.

4. No. Only a malignant narcissist thinks like that. Without any EVIDENCE, you are dismissed.

5. I bet that looked really good in your head. I don't see anyone stooping that low to catch your insults either. Only a malignant narcissist thinks like that. Without any EVIDENCE, you are dismissed.
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 6:31 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 6:31 am

What point are you trying to make?
That Bessent WOULDN'T know?

Show me your evidence. 

**** idiot.

 You're a **** idiot...EVERYONE knows the data is revised in following months, and why.

Except you and the First Felon.

Because you're morons.

We've established that you're an idiot.

And just so you know, you're attempts to "beat me down" are ones in total vain. 

YOU can only "beat down" those who ALLOW IT to happen. I don't ALLOW you to do anything that I don't want happen. YOU have no value in any attempt at doing that.

I know WHAT you are, WHO you are, and have more on you than you will possibly imagine. But that's for another time to discuss.

*Beekeeper » 08 Aug 2025, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 6:47 am

1. YOU said it wasn't politicized. PROVE IT!! YOUR CLAIM, you need the evidence. Otherwise, your claim is dismissed without evidence. Hitchen's Razor.

2. No. Only a malignant narcissist thinks like that. Without any EVIDENCE, you are dismissed. And if the DATA was CORRECT in the month it was issued, there would be NO REASON to "adjust" it. THAT'S THE REAL PROBLEM, boy.

3, Boo hoo. YOU LOST. America saw what it was all about with the lawfare. WE have the evidence now. Watch how it plays out and you can boo hoo some more.

4. No. Only a malignant narcissist thinks like that. Without any EVIDENCE, you are dismissed.

5. I bet that looked really good in your head. I don't see anyone stooping that low to catch your insults either. Only a malignant narcissist thinks like that. Without any EVIDENCE, you are dismissed.

YOU said it wasn't politicized. PROVE IT!! YOUR CLAIM

No...the burden of proof is on the accuser..

**** moron.

And if the DATA was CORRECT in the month it was issued, there would be NO REASON to "adjust" it. THAT'S THE REAL PROBLEM, boy.

why would they be "correct" the first month?

You have no idea how this is done..

WE have the evidence now. Watch how it plays out and you can boo hoo some more.

There's nothing to be revealed...only the wages of stupid....which have been predicted..

 

*Beekeeper » 08 Aug 2025, 6:59 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 6:59 am

And just so you know, you're attempts to "beat me down" are ones in total vain. 

YOU can only "beat down" those who ALLOW IT to happen. I don't ALLOW you to do anything that I don't want happen. YOU have no value in any attempt at doing that.

I know WHAT you are, WHO you are, and have more on you than you will possibly imagine. But that's for another time to discuss.

It doesn't require your confirmation...

 

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 6:59 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 6:59 am

No...the burden of proof is on the accuser..

**** moron.

why would they be "correct" the first month?

You have no idea how this is done..

There's nothing to be revealed...only the wages of stupid....which have been predicted..

1. YOUR OP said it wasn't politicized and that Bessent was making it all up. PROVE IT!! All you did was toss out an allegation without EVIDENCE. Where's that EVIDENCE!!

2. ONLY a malignant narcissist would say that. It's another vapid attempt to "beat down" someone without anything else left in their arsenal.

3, It's a SURVEY done BY PHONE in pretty much ALL INSTANCES of unemployment. And the methodology USED to work when landlines were the only way people communicated BY PHONE. Now, with everyone having a CELL PHONE, NOT reaching the same number of people with a QUALITY interview has ERODED the QUALITY OF THE DATA. It's up to the COMMISSIONER to find a better way. BUT SINCE POLITICS came into play, she REFUSED to try to find a better way. It's WHY data is BAD on the month it's released, and WHY "adjustments" are being made. Ones THAT DRASTIC as the past one was requiring 2 months of MASSIVE ADJUSTMENTS indicate POLITICS, not real revisions were in play here.

4. THERE IS EVIDENCE of the continual LAWFARE waged against Trump. WE found the BURN BAGS with mountains of evidence that didn't get "burned" as it was supposed to be. Stashed in a bunch of ROOMS that weren't supposed to be found either. Sadly, you thought we were too STUPID to find them. Well, we never were, and we did. NOW you are going to see the PRICE TO BE PAID for your inherent dishonesty and attempts to destroy your political opposition by any means possible. 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 7:00 am

It doesn't require your confirmation...

If you thought you got it, you missed the boat.

Again, I bet that looked really good in your head.

*Beekeeper » 08 Aug 2025, 7:08 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 7:08 am

1. YOUR OP said it wasn't politicized and that Bessent was making it all up. PROVE IT!! All you did was toss out an allegation without EVIDENCE. Where's that EVIDENCE!!

2. ONLY a malignant narcissist would say that. It's another vapid attempt to "beat down" someone without anything else left in their arsenal.

3, It's a SURVEY done BY PHONE in pretty much ALL INSTANCES of unemployment. And the methodology USED to work when landlines were the only way people communicated BY PHONE. Now, with everyone having a CELL PHONE, NOT reaching the same number of people with a QUALITY interview has ERODED the QUALITY OF THE DATA. It's up to the COMMISSIONER to find a better way. BUT SINCE POLITICS came into play, she REFUSED to try to find a better way. It's WHY data is BAD on the month it's released, and WHY "adjustments" are being made. Ones THAT DRASTIC as the past one was requiring 2 months of MASSIVE ADJUSTMENTS indicate POLITICS, not real revisions were in play here.

4. THERE IS EVIDENCE of the continual LAWFARE waged against Trump. WE found the BURN BAGS with mountains of evidence that didn't get "burned" as it was supposed to be. Stashed in a bunch of ROOMS that weren't supposed to be found either. Sadly, you thought we were too STUPID to find them. Well, we never were, and we did. NOW you are going to see the PRICE TO BE PAID for your inherent dishonesty and attempts to destroy your political opposition by any means possible.

1. THE BURDEN IS ON THE ACCUSER, YOU **** IDIOT!

2. "Blah, blah..."

3. "It's a SURVEY done BY PHONE in pretty much ALL INSTANCES of unemployment. And the methodology USED to work when landlines were the only way people communicated BY PHONE"


How many times must I tell you that you don't know anything?

All new samples are solicited by computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI), and data are collected for the first 5 months via this mode. After the initiation period, many sample units are transferred to one of several less costly reporting methods that are self-initiated by the respondent. The CES offers responding businesses a choice of reporting modes in an effort to maximize response rates within the program budget. Respondents can report by web, Electronic Data Interchange (EDI), CATI, Touchtone Data Entry (TDE), or other collection methods.

https://www.bls.gov/bls/empsitquickguide.htm




 

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2025, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 1:15 pm

BuckNaked » 07 Aug 2025, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 1:03 pm

He doesn’t strike me as a gay guy.   What’s his deal?

He's gayer than Mayor Pete...



 

I assume you think Mayor Pete is a Porch Pansy as well.

*Huey » 08 Aug 2025, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 7:59 am

I assume you think Mayor Pete is a Porch Pansy as well.

This isn't about me, or Mayor Pete..

It's about porch pansying...

You know a lot about porches, I bet...

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 8:13 am

*Huey » 08 Aug 2025, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 7:59 am

I assume you think Mayor Pete is a Porch Pansy as well.

This isn't about me, or Mayor Pete..

It's about porch pansying...

You know a lot about porches, I bet...

 

LMAO!  Your hypocrisy knows no boundaries.  

*Huey » 08 Aug 2025, 8:18 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 8:18 am

LMAO!  Your hypocrisy knows no boundaries.

"Bounds", @*tunic sporting abuser...

 

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 5:30 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 5:30 am

Yes, it is...

I read them.

 

Per your own admission, you didn't. 

Now you are admitting to a lie. 

JohnnyYou » 07 Aug 2025, 5:54 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 5:54 pm

Is there therapy for MAGA yet?

No therapy needed but TDS is easy to cure!

Vegas » 08 Aug 2025, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 9:09 am

Per your own admission, you didn't. 

Now you are admitting to a lie.

More of your cowardice..

I demonstrated how they are flawed.

You've contributed nothing to anyone's understanding of Survivorship bias...

Because you're a moron. 
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 9:16 am

More of your cowardice..

I demonstrated how they are flawed.


 

The **** you did. Not even close. You can't even answer this: 




Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors 

BuckNaked » 07 Aug 2025, 7:39 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 7:39 pm

I’ve never seen him

his pics are a tell all...
 

Vegas » 08 Aug 2025, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 9:19 am

The **** you did. Not even close. You can't even answer this: 

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Vaporized them.

Humiliated you.

You've never recovered...
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 9:20 am

Vaporized them.

Humiliated you.

You've never recovered...

Blatant projection and blatant lie...Hello Mary.