Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2025, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 6:29 pm

C'mon.....is it my sangfroid?....my elan? My toxic duende?

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2025, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 10:52 am

“Cleaning up the BLS was something that should have been done long ago,” Bessent said on MSNBC Thursday, referring to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. “The mistake that they made last week was a five-to-six standard deviation mistake. This is like, if you got on a plane in Miami, thought you were going to New York and landed in Denver.”

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... d-long-ago

A necessary accessory of every fascist regime...

Scottie,
You must have been in Grifty's stats study group.

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors 

Vegas » 08 Aug 2025, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 9:25 am

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

#5
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 9:27 am

#5

Anyway, I am going to begin flooding you with this now. Prepare to sift through a **** load of notifications. It will all go away as soon as you answer with your defense. 



Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors 
 

Vegas » 08 Aug 2025, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 9:22 am

Blatant projection and blatant lie...Hello Mary.     

Children will sing of it for generations..

Vegas » 08 Aug 2025, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 9:28 am

Anyway, I am going to begin flooding you with this now.

Now?
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 9:30 am

Now?

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors 

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 9:30 am

Now?

now

*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 10:53 am

Why you hatin' on the gay man with such derogatory words?  You must be a homophobe.

Other way around this Scott Bessent the "Gay" Treasury Secratary.

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 7:41 am

1. THE BURDEN IS ON THE ACCUSER, YOU **** IDIOT!

2. "Blah, blah..."

3. "It's a SURVEY done BY PHONE in pretty much ALL INSTANCES of unemployment. And the methodology USED to work when landlines were the only way people communicated BY PHONE"

How many times must I tell you that you don't know anything?

All new samples are solicited by computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI), and data are collected for the first 5 months via this mode. After the initiation period, many sample units are transferred to one of several less costly reporting methods that are self-initiated by the respondent. The CES offers responding businesses a choice of reporting modes in an effort to maximize response rates within the program budget. Respondents can report by web, Electronic Data Interchange (EDI), CATI, Touchtone Data Entry (TDE), or other collection methods.

https://www.bls.gov/bls/empsitquickguide.htm

Then let's do it your way.

You're an IDIOT.

Proven one.

*Beekeeper » 08 Aug 2025, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 3:30 pm

Then let's do it your way.

You're an IDIOT.

Proven one.

Young people don't watch debates or answer polls.

 

*Beekeeper » 08 Aug 2025, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 3:30 pm

Then let's do it your way.

You're an IDIOT.

Proven one.

I'm right.

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 4:38 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 4:38 pm

I'm right.

That you're an idiot?? Well, we agree there.

*Beekeeper » 08 Aug 2025, 7:14 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 7:14 pm

That you're an idiot?? Well, we agree there.

8:14 PM Buzz Killer

youtu.be/qlywcuw-1TU?si=vs3t4wM0WA75aACL

Do better for the beez


Suck Scott Bessents microscopic penis


youtu.be/diYAc7gB-0A?si=CSdcrvxIMikAJNe1

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 4:38 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 4:38 pm

*Beekeeper » 08 Aug 2025, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 3:30 pm

Then let's do it your way.

You're an IDIOT.

Proven one.

I'm right.

 

You are a homophobe.  You should be cancelled.  

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 4:54 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 4:54 am

You are a homophobe.  You should be cancelled.

Your indignation is highly selective.

Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 4:59 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 4:59 am

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 4:54 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 4:54 am

You are a homophobe.  You should be cancelled.

Your indignation is highly selective.

 

You have not seen me make any derogatory gay comments against gay people.  So no, you are lying again.  Se=omebody should send a message to your local paper, at least the left leaning ones, and tell them a single man who is 67 years old, who lives in a 4 unit duplex and is the HOA director, with a particular view, is making homophobic slurs online.

That is something YOUR SIDE would do.

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 5:23 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 5:23 am

You have not seen me make any derogatory gay comments against gay people.  So no, you are lying again.  Se=omebody should send a message to your local paper, at least the left leaning ones, and tell them a single man who is 67 years old, who lives in a 4 unit duplex and is the HOA director, with a particular view, is making homophobic slurs online.

That is something YOUR SIDE would do.

Tiny,

I haven't seen you complain about homophobia or misogyny, or even digital penetration in general.
 

Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 5:30 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 5:30 am

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 5:23 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 5:23 am

You have not seen me make any derogatory gay comments against gay people.  So no, you are lying again.  Se=omebody should send a message to your local paper, at least the left leaning ones, and tell them a single man who is 67 years old, who lives in a 4 unit duplex and is the HOA director, with a particular view, is making homophobic slurs online.

That is something YOUR SIDE would do.

Tiny,

I haven't seen you complain about homophobia or misogyny, or even digital penetration in general.
 

 

The is because you don't read my posts.   But I am gad you agree you have seen me make derogatory gay sure against gay people.  

Thanks a bunch, Mr. Vegetable.