Liberal Forum

President Donald Trump had just named a new nominee to the board of the Federal Reserve and imposed hundreds of billions of dollars in new import taxes when he quickly summoned the White House press pool Thursday for what was described as an urgent economic announcement. But in the Oval Office, the president stood with an easel, poster-sized charts and longtime conservative economist Stephen Moore, an informal Trump adviser.
  “We’re going to have a quick session with Steve Moore,” Trump said, then yielded the floor.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business ... e-economy/

The Great White Dope uses a "life line".....and it is the economic comedian, Steve Moore.


Grifty can't make his own case....so he calls up the least credible analyst alive...
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 6:25 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 6:25 am

President Donald Trump had just named a new nominee to the board of the Federal Reserve and imposed hundreds of billions of dollars in new import taxes when he quickly summoned the White House press pool Thursday for what was described as an urgent economic announcement. But in the Oval Office, the president stood with an easel, poster-sized charts and longtime conservative economist Stephen Moore, an informal Trump adviser.
  “We’re going to have a quick session with Steve Moore,” Trump said, then yielded the floor.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business ... e-economy/

The Great White Dope uses a "life line".....and it is the economic comedian, Steve Moore.

Grifty can't make his own case....so he calls up the least credible analyst alive...

Is that Biden in the corner licking an ice cream cone?
Should someone tell him he no longer has the job?  

 

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 6:25 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 6:25 am

President Donald Trump had just named a new nominee to the board of the Federal Reserve and imposed hundreds of billions of dollars in new import taxes when he quickly summoned the White House press pool Thursday for what was described as an urgent economic announcement. But in the Oval Office, the president stood with an easel, poster-sized charts and longtime conservative economist Stephen Moore, an informal Trump adviser.
  “We’re going to have a quick session with Steve Moore,” Trump said, then yielded the floor.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business ... e-economy/

The Great White Dope uses a "life line".....and it is the economic comedian, Steve Moore.


Grifty can't make his own case....so he calls up the least credible analyst alive...
 

 

PowerPutz Cries - "B...b...b...b...but Biduhn!"

Mr. Vegetabe, in the interest of time, the tread title is posted.

So B...b...b...b...but Biduhn is bad but on damn near every single thread you participate in, some that are not even political, you whine B...b...b...b...but Trump because your stated position is that anything not about trump is a diversions.

*Huey » 08 Aug 2025, 7:13 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 7:13 am

Mr. Vegetabe, in the interest of time, the tread title is posted.

So B...b...b...b...but Biduhn is bad but on damn near every single thread you participate in, some that are not even political, you whine B...b...b...b...but Trump because your stated position is that anything not about trump is a diversions.

Try the topic...


Just once...
 

RebelGator » 08 Aug 2025, 6:57 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 6:57 am

Is that Biden in the corner licking an ice cream cone?
Should someone tell him he no longer has the job?

Maybe someone should tell Steve and Grifty.

The charts, five of them, indicated that they showed revisions of Bureau of Labor Statistics jobs data, median household income and net change in household income. The Post was unable to immediately verify the data. The White House and Moore did not immediately share the charts or the underlying figures used to produce them

Ibid.



Totally Stevie....

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 7:27 am

*Huey » 08 Aug 2025, 7:13 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 7:13 am

Mr. Vegetabe, in the interest of time, the tread title is posted.

So B...b...b...b...but Biduhn is bad but on damn near every single thread you participate in, some that are not even political, you whine B...b...b...b...but Trump because your stated position is that anything not about trump is a diversions.

Try the topic...


Just once...
 

 

Sorry, Mr Vegetable, I commented your title which, once you post it, is part of your topic.  I told you that you are not very witty and should just stay on topic with your titles.

As a matter of fact, YOU **** your threads with your not so witty thread titles.  Accept responsibility for YOUR actions....

Just ONCE....


   

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 6:25 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 6:25 am

President Donald Trump had just named a new nominee to the board of the Federal Reserve and imposed hundreds of billions of dollars in new import taxes when he quickly summoned the White House press pool Thursday for what was described as an urgent economic announcement. But in the Oval Office, the president stood with an easel, poster-sized charts and longtime conservative economist Stephen Moore, an informal Trump adviser.
  “We’re going to have a quick session with Steve Moore,” Trump said, then yielded the floor.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business ... e-economy/

The Great White Dope uses a "life line".....and it is the economic comedian, Steve Moore.

Grifty can't make his own case....so he calls up the least credible analyst alive...

Do you know what the REAL ISSUE is, BV??

WE are winning. YOU are not.

And that just blisters that ARSE of yours immensely!! 

But the REAL QUESTION is....

"Why do you want to see America LOSE?? Is gaining power so you can once again DESTROY THIS NATION that important to you??"

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 7:27 am

Try the topic...

Just once...

Would that everyone took that advice.

Know what I mean, Vern?
 
 

*Beekeeper » 08 Aug 2025, 7:43 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 7:43 am

Do you know what the REAL ISSUE is, BV??

WE are winning. YOU are not.

Yes..

You're an idiot.

If you're "winning", why fire the scorekeeper?
 

Cannonpointer » 08 Aug 2025, 7:44 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 7:44 am

Would that everyone took that advice.

Know what I mean, Vern?

I bet you do...

*Huey » 08 Aug 2025, 7:38 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 7:38 am

Sorry, Mr Vegetable, I commented your title which, once you post it, is part of your topic.  I told you that you are not very witty and should just stay on topic with your titles.

As a matter of fact, YOU **** your threads with your not so witty thread titles.  Accept responsibility for YOUR actions....

Just ONCE....

 

Is it inaccurate?


 

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 6:25 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 6:25 am

President Donald Trump had just named a new nominee to the board of the Federal Reserve and imposed hundreds of billions of dollars in new import taxes when he quickly summoned the White House press pool Thursday for what was described as an urgent economic announcement. But in the Oval Office, the president stood with an easel, poster-sized charts and longtime conservative economist Stephen Moore, an informal Trump adviser.
  “We’re going to have a quick session with Steve Moore,” Trump said, then yielded the floor.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business ... e-economy/

The Great White Dope uses a "life line".....and it is the economic comedian, Steve Moore.

Grifty can't make his own case....so he calls up the least credible analyst alive...

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors 

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 7:45 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 7:45 am

Yes..

You're an idiot.

If you're "winning", why fire the scorekeeper?

The scorekeeper in INEPT, that's why!!

When you have to CORRECT THE SCORE EVERY MONTH, you got an issue!!

Vegas » 08 Aug 2025, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 9:24 am

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

This **** just gets worse and worse..

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 9:42 am

This **** just gets worse and worse..

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors 
 

*Beekeeper » 08 Aug 2025, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 9:41 am

The scorekeeper in INEPT, that's why!!

When you have to CORRECT THE SCORE EVERY MONTH, you got an issue!!

So you STILL have no idea how it is done.


 

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 9:47 am

So you STILL have no idea how it is done.

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors 

Moore said he meets with Trump every few months or so — “I don’t see him unless there’s something, you know, that is important to tell him” — and felt the numbers warranted the president’s attention.

“I saw the data, and I knew he would like it. It’s very positive for Trump,” Moore said. “ … I thought this was pretty important. He likes data, especially if it's good news."


ibid.

Steve,

That means he likes "good news"....because his hostility to data is legend.

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 9:47 am

So you STILL have no idea how it is done.

That was answered on a few posts up. Try looking there before you make accusations that are not based on anything but your failures.

The fact remains, REVISIONS to data AFTER THE FACT because of INEPTITUDE IN GATHERING, COMPILING AND PUBLISHING DATA requires a new face to revise the METHODOLOGY!!

ALL the BLS data that is published SHOULD BE 100% as accurate as it possibly can be BEFORE it's published, not revised to ANY degree after the fact. THAT creates uncertainty and a mistrust in anything the government publishes.