Liberal Forum

Johnny » wrote:

01 Feb 1970, 11:52 pm

Nebraska has a low unemployment rate. They have jobs they can't fill.

They didn't care if the immigrants were legal or not. The meat had to be processed for profit.

Plenty of shovel shyt ready jobs there. The immies split.
 

 

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 6:03 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 6:03 am

Google AI
In the past, Democrats, including prominent figures like Barack Obama, have expressed support for holding employers accountable for hiring undocumented workers. This approach was exemplified by policies such as the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986, which imposed penalties on employers who knowingly hired undocumented immigrants. At the time, this was seen as a way to both enforce immigration laws and protect American workers from wage depression. 

However, the Democratic party's stance on this issue has evolved significantly. While some moderate Democrats still support stronger penalties for businesses hiring unauthorized workers, the party as a whole has increasingly focused on providing pathways to legal status for undocumented immigrants and addressing the root causes of migration, according to NPR. This shift is reflected in recent party platforms, which tend to emphasize the humanitarian aspects of immigration and focus less on border security and enforcement measures like employer sanctions.

Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 6:11 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 6:11 am

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 6:03 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 6:03 am

Google AI
In the past, Democrats, including prominent figures like Barack Obama, have expressed support for holding employers accountable for hiring undocumented workers. This approach was exemplified by policies such as the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986, which imposed penalties on employers who knowingly hired undocumented immigrants. At the time, this was seen as a way to both enforce immigration laws and protect American workers from wage depression. 

However, the Democratic party's stance on this issue has evolved significantly. While some moderate Democrats still support stronger penalties for businesses hiring unauthorized workers, the party as a whole has increasingly focused on providing pathways to legal status for undocumented immigrants and addressing the root causes of migration, according to NPR. This shift is reflected in recent party platforms, which tend to emphasize the humanitarian aspects of immigration and focus less on border security and enforcement measures like employer sanctions.

Who was POTUS in 1986?

 

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 6:15 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 6:15 am

I am not sure you understand what you read:

n the past, Democrats, including prominent figures like Barack Obama, have expressed support for holding employers accountable for hiring undocumented workers. This approach was exemplified by policies such as the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986,

Try again, Lil ONe.

Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 6:11 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 6:11 am

Who was POTUS in 1986?

JohnnyYou » 09 Aug 2025, 6:42 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 6:42 am

Reagan.  Yes, our immigration issue is bipartisan.

Volunteering for Self Deportation takes you straight to Alligator Alcatraz.
 
Those day workers, meat packers, and tomato pickers are evil.  A BLT will be 50,000$ soon.

Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 6:40 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 6:40 am

Answer the question.

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 6:56 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 6:56 am

Nope.  Not until we have new conditions.  

Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 6:59 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 6:59 am

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 6:56 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 6:56 am

Nope.  Not until we have new conditions.  

You don't answer questions under ANY conditions, why do you need new ones?

 

*Huey » 08 Aug 2025, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 11:49 am

Blackvegetable » 08 Aug 2025, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 11:38 am

*Huey » 08 Aug 2025, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 11:33 am

LMAO!  Says the guy hiding behind Peanut Gallery in call out thread.  Nah, your cowardice makes me laugh, Pepper Spray.

Were you not afforded the opportunity to tell your tale of Victimhood?


 

I started a thread you ran from where I did just that.  And I did not hide behind PG in my call out thread.  ;). There wa no need for another other than your disorder where you need to be in charge.  Remember, you posted this the original thread:

​​​​​

Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2025, 6:53 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 6:53 am

*Huey » 05 Aug 2025, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2025, 6:51 am

Bv, here is a thread for you to make YOUR argument about tagging.

Controlly,

That is not how this will be done...
 


 

Acknowledge you were answered

 

*Huey » 08 Aug 2025, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2025, 7:06 am

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2025, 5:14 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 5:14 pm

*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 9:28 am

I wouldn't say he is on the run.  He is avoiding it until his influencers tell him what think and say.

Will you ever actually name one of my influencers?


 

That professor of economics for CA, Shower Cap, The Tick, CNN, etc.....

Acknowledge you were answered.  That it's for today, Sir

 

*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 8:16 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 8:16 am

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2025, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 7:32 am

*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 7:29 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 7:29 am

Do you agree to answer questions on one for one basis? If not, my point is made.  Thanks.

You can stop projecting and post the information to which you make vague reference. 

Or we will proceed on the assumption that it is yet another empty slogan.
 


 

Right to the source.  No need for me to provide narrative.  You claim you can read:

https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/ ... 0-pr-18-25

Acknowledge you have been answered.  

 

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 7:11 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 7:11 am

You should really read what I post.  There is 3 right there from the past few days.  If you read what I post you would not post such blatant and ignorant lies.  I have plenty more.  I have nothing more to say o this diversion

There is 3 right there from the past few days. If you read what I post you would not post such blatant and ignorant lies

Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 6:40 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 6:40 am

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 6:15 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 6:15 am

I am not sure you understand what you read:

n the past, Democrats, including prominent figures like Barack Obama, have expressed support for holding employers accountable for hiring undocumented workers. This approach was exemplified by policies such as the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986,

Try again, Lil ONe.

Answer the question. 

 

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 8:28 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 8:28 am

Circling back, away from your diversion,

It is great that your Man Crush discussed implanting Reagan Policy that was probably part of the deal mad with Democrats concerning amnesty.

from your diversion,