Liberal Forum

Google AI

Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presided over the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
. 
Judge Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict in that case. In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial. 
It's important to note that a judge can overturn a jury's verdict in certain specific circumstances, such as if there wasn't enough evidence to support the verdict or if there were errors during the trial that prejudiced the outcome. However, this is relatively rare. 
In this particular case, Judge Kaplan not only upheld the jury's verdict but also, in a later, separate trial determining damages for a different defamatory statement, ruled that Trump was precluded from arguing that he did not sexually assault Ms. Carroll, leaving only the issue of damages to be decided by the jury. 

And that is all there is to say about that.

Here's where AI and NoI, collide.

AI is entirely correct in saying Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict.

Because, in his filing which COP did not read, he declined TEAM GRIFTY'S petition to do so.

As OP has invited this *** kicking, I think it is time he told us why Team Grifty asked for relief. 

phoenix 68 avatar phoenix 68 -1 3 minutes ago

I don't care if you cry like a bish, but sweep up his remains...

ROG62 » 09 Aug 2025, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 9:24 am

Go pick up the broken pieces of your little buddy...

Hueycide by AI.

And that is all there is to say about that. 

About time....


 

Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 9:25 am

Go pick up the broken pieces of your little buddy...

The king's men are out of horses..   Hegseth and Noam stole a bunch of money.

Hoompty Dooty is gone like a freight train. Honor is second besty to corruption. All the Thieves have Nihlism.

The cost per deportee is going to sky rocket with 50,000$ sign on bonuses for nimwit patrols. If each guy does 100 outta heres thats still 5 K a piece.  What was it under Joe?
 
 
 

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 9:56 am

Thank you , Thank You, Thank You, Mr. Vegetable.  In your own words you agree that Kaplan did ot overturn the verdict MEANING that Trump wa not found liable for rape.

The jury verdict stands. 

Ps.  That meltdown of a post was one step away for being PGd.  But you stayed on TOPIC just enough to avoid that.

You are impenetrably **** stupid.....

Who asked Judge Kaplan to overturn the Jury's vedict?

Mrkelly » 09 Aug 2025, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 10:23 am

I asked AI  “ is sexual abuse a form of rape”

it said “An AI Overview is not available for this search” 

She don't touch.. In that regard Shoove is right, she ain't got no soul like a big legged woman. I have gotten the "Go Away" Troll face palm too. Even shows a picture of a dragon phishing..  I saved it, I could share it..  But you know...

I asked her "What degree does Lutnick have" She says " BS from Harvard"  the first time.  I asked did he get a Masters degree. She came back and said no all he has is a BS in Economics from Haverford University..  She is close enough for Rudy's cigars and Monica would not trust her with a 10 ft Arnold Palmer.

So is Huey saying Trump has to pay E Jean for grabbing her by the ******?   Hell, if that's against the law I owe some people here billions.
 
 
 

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 10:39 am

Well, it doesn't matter what google AI says.  What matters is what NY State law said was rape at the time and the fact Kaplan instructed the jury to use that definition.

Nice try.

  what did I try?

do tell   

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 10:42 am

It doesn't matter what he qualified.  He did not overturn the verdict which means what is on file in the court system is trump was liable for sexual assault and defamation.  

Not rape.  

I stopped when I got here.  The rest appeared you melting down and posting effluvium.

A judge has now clarified that this is basically a legal distinction without a real-world difference. He says that what the jury found Trump did was in fact rape, as commonly understood.
 

POST THE VERDICT, NOT A RETELLING

The rest appeared you melting down and posting effluvium.

The citation from the article on which you've repeatedly commented but never read?

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 10:39 am

Well, it doesn't matter what google AI says.  What matters is what NY State law said was rape at the time and the fact Kaplan instructed the jury to use that definition.

Nice try.

Does that mean AI does, or does not, support your position?

 

Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 9:25 am

Go pick up the broken pieces of your little buddy...

brown, you're a **** moron...
 

Vegas » 09 Aug 2025, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 11:28 am

I typed it in and it gave me this:

The answer should have been Trump is the definition of it.

JohnnyYou » 09 Aug 2025, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 11:35 am

The answer should have been Trump is the definition of it.

Pointless argument. Yo will lose every time. Sexual harassment and assault from presidents go back for decades, maybe even over a century. So unless you are willing to put your party on the stand also, your view about Trump is pointless. 

Vegas » 09 Aug 2025, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 11:47 am

Pointless argument. Yo will lose every time. Sexual harassment and assault from presidents go back for decades, maybe even over a century. So unless you are willing to put your party on the stand also, your view about Trump is pointless.

Agreed, even the ancient greek pjilosophers so many admire were homosexual pedophiliacs.

I admit the E Jean Carrol thing is wierd..  He grabbed her ******, he says he does/did it all the time to many women, so just let it go.  Pay her and let it live under a MAGA Rock in the Darchives.
 
 

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 10:51 am

1.  I have posted it numerous times.  Not doing it again.  If you are smart you can use the search function and find it or google it like a man would.  Like many of us have on numerous occasions.  Damn, you are one spoiled little princess.

2. You do not have question privileges because you refuse to agree to conditions that are fair to both parties.

Let me know when you do.  Any further repeat questions will go to PG.
 

1. No, you haven't. You're lying. 

2. You're a lying coward....You invited this epic pasting - stand by it.

 Any further repeat questions will go to PG.

If you assert ****, you shouldn't expect to go unchallenged.

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 12:33 pm

Not my job.  Your case, you do the work.  I have enough times MYSELF.  Remeber, I told you I don’t repeats because you can’t remember and your lazy.
 

Not my job.  Your case, you do the work.

Post the thread title....

**** idiot.

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 8:44 am

Google AI

Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presided over the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
. 
Judge Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict in that case. In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial. 
It's important to note that a judge can overturn a jury's verdict in certain specific circumstances, such as if there wasn't enough evidence to support the verdict or if there were errors during the trial that prejudiced the outcome. However, this is relatively rare. 
In this particular case, Judge Kaplan not only upheld the jury's verdict but also, in a later, separate trial determining damages for a different defamatory statement, ruled that Trump was precluded from arguing that he did not sexually assault Ms. Carroll, leaving only the issue of damages to be decided by the jury. 

And that is all there is to say about that.

Can HueyCoward provide a link to the petition to overturn the verdict?

*Beekeeper » 09 Aug 2025, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 11:41 am

When it came to the question of "did Trump rape Carroll", what was that verdict??

Seeing how you JUST CLAIMED that Kaplan UPHELD IT!!

There was only ONE verdict..

You may post what HueyCoward won't....