Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
Peanut Gallery
‹
R: Kaolan DID NOT overturn the Jury Verdict.
R: Kaolan DID NOT overturn the Jury Verdict.
By *Huey
9 Aug 2025 8:43 am in Peanut Gallery
9 Aug 2025 2:41 pm
This is YOUR OP.....You won't even specify the verdict you assert wasn't overturned, or identify the party asking that it be done....*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑ I am gonna leave this one just so every one knows what a spoiled, demanding, princess who is in meltdown mode looks like. So far that is THREE posts demanding I repost a the verdict because you are too lazy to make your own argument.
The reason being that the minute you do, you make my case.......again.
9 Aug 2025 2:42 pm
Yes.*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Damn BV, five posts all saying the same thing. What a loser!
That you are a liar, 37x
and a coward.
Did I mention "moron"?
9 Aug 2025 2:45 pm
You weren't asked to post a form, lying little twat...*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑ BOOM! Meltdown Mary is in the house! And Mary is lying because she thinks I will repost the verdict form for the umpteenth time.
You were asked to post the verdict. No one asked for a "verdict form", that is not what Kaplan declined to overturn.
9 Aug 2025 3:15 pm
Vegas » 09 Aug 2025, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑ Pointless argument. Yo will lose every time. Sexual harassment and assault from presidents go back for decades, maybe even over a century. So unless you are willing to put your party on the stand also, your view about Trump is pointless.
Mormon is the correct answer. A,B,C, and D have all gone to hell.
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
You need to add your own 8chttpees to slash slash and hack through the @Cannon Pointer Parental Guidance Filter.
You need to add your own 8chttpees to slash slash and hack through the @Cannon Pointer Parental Guidance Filter.
9 Aug 2025 3:16 pm
Post the verdict to which the OP refers.*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑ The fact of the matter is that Trump was found liable for sexual assault, not rape, IAW NY State Law, in a civil trial where the burden of proof Is MUCH LOWER. No, he is NOT a rapist felon. Some people are just plain dumb.
Note that I am not asking for a "verdict form".
Who asked Kaplan to overturn it?
9 Aug 2025 3:30 pm
WHY WAS THIS SENT TO PG?
Post the verdict to which the OP refers.
Note that I am not asking for a "verdict form".
Who asked Kaplan to overturn it?
Post the verdict to which the OP refers.
Note that I am not asking for a "verdict form".
Who asked Kaplan to overturn it?
9 Aug 2025 3:40 pm
How does he dodge a bullet?
so tRump dodged that bullet ?The request to overturn, WHICH WAS DENIED, was from Team Grifty.....
It petitioned the Court on the grounds that it "wasn't rape".
The Judge responded by UPHOLDING that jury verdict - WHICH AWARDED THE PLAINTIFF 2 MILLION - and taintpunting the "not rape" jive argued by Team Rapist Felon.
9 Aug 2025 3:40 pm
Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑I just reposted the link you demanded, Coward.*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Not my job. Your case, you do the work. I have enough times MYSELF. Remeber, I told you I don’t repeats because you can’t remember and your lazy.
Now post the verdict to which you refer in the OP.
Mr. Vegetable, two things. YOU Post YHOUR stand and supporting argument and YOU post whatever supporting citations you feel you need to support said argument.
Second, as my buddy and myself are sitting by the pit boss grill making a London Broil, we are both curious in a humorous way, who the **** do you think you are to make demands of me to make your argument?
LMMFAO! You Sir, are a **** hoot. Post your own ****, Princes.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
9 Aug 2025 3:43 pm
*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑ The fact of the matter is that Trump was found liable for sexual assault, not rape, IAW NY State Law, in a civil trial where the burden of proof Is MUCH LOWER. No, he is NOT a rapist felon. Some people are just plain dumb.
is that the jury awarded the plaintiff 2 million dollars, because they believe that what Grifty did was rape. That award was upheld, and the Judge made clear the intentions of the jury in making the award.The fact of the matter
Further, you have NEVER read any of the relevant documents, and are running from your own PG thread.
9 Aug 2025 3:47 pm
*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Mr. Vegetable, two things. YOU Post YHOUR stand and supporting argument and YOU post whatever supporting citations you feel you need to support said argument.
Second, as my buddy and myself are sitting by the pit boss grill making a London Broil, we are both curious in a humorous way, who the **** do you think you are to make demands of me to make your argument?
LMMFAO! You Sir, are a **** hoot. Post your own ****, Princes.
Whose OP is this?YOU Post YHOUR stand and supporting argument and
Does the thread title make reference to a verdict?
If so, isn't it YOUR argument?
**** imbecile.
9 Aug 2025 3:48 pm
Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑ The fact of the matter is that Trump was found liable for sexual assault, not rape, IAW NY State Law, in a civil trial where the burden of proof Is MUCH LOWER. No, he is NOT a rapist felon. Some people are just plain dumb.is that the jury awarded the plaintiff 2 million dollars, because they believe that what Grifty did was rape. That award was upheld, and the Judge made clear the intentions of the jury in making the award.The fact of the matter
Further, you have NEVER read any of the relevant documents, and are running from your own PG thread.
I don't know who Grifty is. Please try again. Off to PG for not presenting your case with citations.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
9 Aug 2025 3:48 pm
Facts you felt compelled to censor.*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Damn BV, five posts all saying the same thing. What a loser!
9 Aug 2025 3:49 pm
You keep running from your own thread....*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Mr. Vegetable, two things. YOU Post YHOUR stand and supporting argument and YOU post whatever supporting citations you feel you need to support said argument.
Second, as my buddy and myself are sitting by the pit boss grill making a London Broil, we are both curious in a humorous way, who the **** do you think you are to make demands of me to make your argument?
LMMFAO! You Sir, are a **** hoot. Post your own ****, Princes.
9 Aug 2025 3:50 pm
Yo have not posted any facts to censor. No citations, jus questions and demands that I do h=your work for you. Not gonna happen, lil buddy.Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑Facts you felt compelled to censor.*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Damn BV, five posts all saying the same thing. What a loser!
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
9 Aug 2025 3:53 pm
I find one, and you restore all my posts AND post the verdict to which you refer.*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 3:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Yo have not posted any facts to censor. No citations, jus questions and demands that I do h=your work for you. Not gonna happen, lil buddy.
9 Aug 2025 3:55 pm
Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 3:53 pm » wrote: ↑I find one, and you restore all my posts AND post the verdict to which you refer.*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 3:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Yo have not posted any facts to censor. No citations, jus questions and demands that I do h=your work for you. Not gonna happen, lil buddy.
Mr. Tny Feet, you should have done that from the get go. So no. You are incapable of making an argument on your own. Run along to PG.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
9 Aug 2025 3:57 pm
9 Aug 2025 4:00 pm
You won't even post the verdict to which your title refers, or the party seeking to have it overturned.*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Mr. Vegetable, two things. YOU Post YHOUR stand and supporting argument and YOU post whatever supporting citations you feel you need to support said argument.
Second, as my buddy and myself are sitting by the pit boss grill making a London Broil, we are both curious in a humorous way, who the **** do you think you are to make demands of me to make your argument?
LMMFAO! You Sir, are a **** hoot. Post your own ****, Princes.
Because if you did, you'd understand where all this went so terribly wrong..
and it isn't as if I didn't make every effort to clear it up....
9 Aug 2025 4:03 pm
HueyBlackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑ No one has ever claimed that Kaplan "overturned" the jury’s verdict....
This is why morons must NEVER play with AI...
Here's another reason.
The cretinous OP has not only been directed to the full text of Judge Kaplan's filing, but he has been repeatedly invited to confirm what obliged it. While refusing to do so on some principle unarticulated, said cretinous OP delegates the task of reading it to AI.
Had COP bothered to read it, he would be "educated" on the topic of the "special verdict" the idiot labors, but doesn't understand.
It is important to note that COP is only law, and reading, proximate.
Mr. Tny Feet, you should have done that from the get go. So no. You are incapable of making an argument on your own. Run along to PG
What a **** lying coward.
9 Aug 2025 4:04 pm
Just to be clear......You don't use PG to hide, right?*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ Google AI
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presided over the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
.
Judge Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict in that case. In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial.
It's important to note that a judge can overturn a jury's verdict in certain specific circumstances, such as if there wasn't enough evidence to support the verdict or if there were errors during the trial that prejudiced the outcome. However, this is relatively rare.
In this particular case, Judge Kaplan not only upheld the jury's verdict but also, in a later, separate trial determining damages for a different defamatory statement, ruled that Trump was precluded from arguing that he did not sexually assault Ms. Carroll, leaving only the issue of damages to be decided by the jury.
And that is all there is to say about that.
Who is online
In total there are 3331 users online :: 5 registered, 15 bots, and 3311 guests
Bots: DuckDuckGo, Baiduspider, NING, LCC, proximic, CriteoBot, app.hypefactors.com, ADmantX, YandexBot, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, linkfluence.com, bingbot, curl/7, Googlebot