*******, this isn't a call out or tribute thread.Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑Just to be clear......You don't use PG to hide, right?*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ Google AI
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presided over the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
.
Judge Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict in that case. In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial.
It's important to note that a judge can overturn a jury's verdict in certain specific circumstances, such as if there wasn't enough evidence to support the verdict or if there were errors during the trial that prejudiced the outcome. However, this is relatively rare.
In this particular case, Judge Kaplan not only upheld the jury's verdict but also, in a later, separate trial determining damages for a different defamatory statement, ruled that Trump was precluded from arguing that he did not sexually assault Ms. Carroll, leaving only the issue of damages to be decided by the jury.
And that is all there is to say about that.
It was a jokeBlackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑ How does he dodge a bullet?
The request to overturn, WHICH WAS DENIED, was from Team Grifty.....
It petitioned the Court on the grounds that it "wasn't rape".
The Judge responded by UPHOLDING that jury verdict - WHICH AWARDED THE PLAINTIFF 2 MILLION - and taintpunting the "not rape" jive argued by Team Rapist Felon.
1. No...not once......*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. I have posted the verdict MULTIPLE TIMES.
2. Lil Man, it is your job to show where you think this went wrong.
3. What is **** you is your refusal to ever answer questions. SO, what that means is you are gong to have to find your balls, take a stand, and provide your own citations and links. Like you demand of every other poster here.
You don't own this place.
I did. You haven't.and provide your own citations and links
Tell everyone how you don't hide behind PG, @*HooooeyVagina*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ Google AI
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presided over the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
.
Judge Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict in that case. In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial.
It's important to note that a judge can overturn a jury's verdict in certain specific circumstances, such as if there wasn't enough evidence to support the verdict or if there were errors during the trial that prejudiced the outcome. However, this is relatively rare.
In this particular case, Judge Kaplan not only upheld the jury's verdict but also, in a later, separate trial determining damages for a different defamatory statement, ruled that Trump was precluded from arguing that he did not sexually assault Ms. Carroll, leaving only the issue of damages to be decided by the jury.
And that is all there is to say about that.
my bad.....Mrkelly » 09 Aug 2025, 4:06 pm » wrote: ↑ It was a joke
A bullet joke
not so funny if I have to splain it
Where are the*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 4:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Apparently, @Blackvegetable is not capable of doing what he expects all other posters on the forum to do. That is take a stand, present an argument and back it with proper attribution, or links, and citations.
Not sure why he can't do that. He was allegedly a legal admission to a little known Ivy League school that was founded by slave traders.
You're hiding behind PG refusing to identify the verdict to which you refer....is not capable of doing what he expects all other posters on the forum to do. That is take a stand
So you don't contest that you are hiding......
*Beekeeper » 09 Aug 2025, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh he's capable. It's just that he doesn't like the RESULTS!!
A typical malignant narcissist behavior.
The result of my clinical dissection of the OP is that Tiny, by his own admission, is hiding behind PG....*Beekeeper » 09 Aug 2025, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh he's capable. It's just that he doesn't like the RESULTS!!
A typical malignant narcissist behavior.
*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ Google AI
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presided over the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
.
Judge Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict in that case. In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial.
It's important to note that a judge can overturn a jury's verdict in certain specific circumstances, such as if there wasn't enough evidence to support the verdict or if there were errors during the trial that prejudiced the outcome. However, this is relatively rare.
In this particular case, Judge Kaplan not only upheld the jury's verdict but also, in a later, separate trial determining damages for a different defamatory statement, ruled that Trump was precluded from arguing that he did not sexually assault Ms. Carroll, leaving only the issue of damages to be decided by the jury.
And that is all there is to say about that.
Post the verdict he didn't overturn, Braindead Coward.*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 6:04 pm » wrote: ↑ There is nothing to hide.
AI is entirely correct in saying Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict.
once again MR *******, you prove my point.
once again, short bus, the thread title:
Re: Kaplan DID NOT overturn the Jury Verdict.
You can't even tell us what this "verdict" is..
Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑ The result of my clinical dissection of the OP is that Tiny, by his own admission, is hiding behind PG....
but he has a reason why it is not cowardice.....
Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑ How does he dodge a bullet?
The request to overturn, WHICH WAS DENIED, was from Team Grifty.....
It petitioned the Court on the grounds that it "wasn't rape".
The Judge responded by UPHOLDING that jury verdict - WHICH AWARDED THE PLAINTIFF 2 MILLION - and taintpunting the "not rape" jive argued by Team Rapist Felon.
You know it is because @*TinyREMF hid it in PG...*Beekeeper » 10 Aug 2025, 6:06 am » wrote: ↑ "Clinical dissection? How does that work??
You post something that is totally off topic and then call it "clinical dissection" and puff out your chest and claim "I won"???
Tell us more.