Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
Peanut Gallery
‹
R: Kaolan DID NOT overturn the Jury Verdict.
R: Kaolan DID NOT overturn the Jury Verdict.
By *Huey
9 Aug 2025 8:43 am in Peanut Gallery
10 Aug 2025 6:13 am
Why does this thread need PG?*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ Google AI
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presided over the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
.
Judge Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict in that case. In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial.
It's important to note that a judge can overturn a jury's verdict in certain specific circumstances, such as if there wasn't enough evidence to support the verdict or if there were errors during the trial that prejudiced the outcome. However, this is relatively rare.
In this particular case, Judge Kaplan not only upheld the jury's verdict but also, in a later, separate trial determining damages for a different defamatory statement, ruled that Trump was precluded from arguing that he did not sexually assault Ms. Carroll, leaving only the issue of damages to be decided by the jury.
And that is all there is to say about that.
10 Aug 2025 6:14 am
That's not the verdict.
You're an idiot.
10 Aug 2025 6:24 am
Really?? So what is it then??
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
10 Aug 2025 7:17 am
Who petitioned to have what reduced?*Huey » 10 Aug 2025, 7:15 am » wrote: ↑ Thanks again. Kaplan did not overturn the jury verdict. Don’t give a **** why, 37x, he just did meaning Trump was not found liable for rape.
10 Aug 2025 9:10 am
Who sought relief, Fondler?*Beekeeper » 10 Aug 2025, 7:20 am » wrote: ↑ You seem very upset here.
THIS is a verdict form for a VERDICT...
https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png
And this is the one KAPLAN UPHELD!!
How hard is that one for you to understand?? And that INCLUDED the finding that NO RAPE WAS PROVEN!!
See, this is easy once you stop the "circular firing squad" you are trying to get in the middle of. You are ONLY shooting yourself in this.
10 Aug 2025 9:22 am
Who sought relief, Fondler?*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ Google AI
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presided over the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
.
Judge Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict in that case. In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial.
It's important to note that a judge can overturn a jury's verdict in certain specific circumstances, such as if there wasn't enough evidence to support the verdict or if there were errors during the trial that prejudiced the outcome. However, this is relatively rare.
In this particular case, Judge Kaplan not only upheld the jury's verdict but also, in a later, separate trial determining damages for a different defamatory statement, ruled that Trump was precluded from arguing that he did not sexually assault Ms. Carroll, leaving only the issue of damages to be decided by the jury.
And that is all there is to say about that.
10 Aug 2025 9:25 am
Resolved.*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ Google AI
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presided over the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
.
Judge Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict in that case. In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial.
It's important to note that a judge can overturn a jury's verdict in certain specific circumstances, such as if there wasn't enough evidence to support the verdict or if there were errors during the trial that prejudiced the outcome. However, this is relatively rare.
In this particular case, Judge Kaplan not only upheld the jury's verdict but also, in a later, separate trial determining damages for a different defamatory statement, ruled that Trump was precluded from arguing that he did not sexually assault Ms. Carroll, leaving only the issue of damages to be decided by the jury.
And that is all there is to say about that.
Some unidentified verdict was not reversed at the request of an unspecified party..
10 Aug 2025 9:27 am
New 37x, you have already agreed that Kaplan DID NOT overturn the verdict.Blackvegetable » 10 Aug 2025, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑Who sought relief, Fondler?*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ Google AI
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presided over the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
.
Judge Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict in that case. In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial.
It's important to note that a judge can overturn a jury's verdict in certain specific circumstances, such as if there wasn't enough evidence to support the verdict or if there were errors during the trial that prejudiced the outcome. However, this is relatively rare.
In this particular case, Judge Kaplan not only upheld the jury's verdict but also, in a later, separate trial determining damages for a different defamatory statement, ruled that Trump was precluded from arguing that he did not sexually assault Ms. Carroll, leaving only the issue of damages to be decided by the jury.
And that is all there is to say about that.
Now, on the real thread if you feel the answer to that question is somehow relevant you may go back to it, and without questions, take your stand, provide narrative and provide citations/attribjution as to why you think it is important to the subject.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
10 Aug 2025 9:34 am
Who petitioned him to do so?*Huey » 10 Aug 2025, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑ YOU specified it right there and it was specified in the OP:
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presided over the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
.
Judge Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict in that case.
10 Aug 2025 9:45 am
Who petitioned the court for relief?*Huey » 10 Aug 2025, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑ YOU specified it right there and it was specified in the OP:
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presided over the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
.
Judge Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict in that case.
10 Aug 2025 9:52 am
Whose petition was denied?*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ Google AI
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presided over the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
.
Judge Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict in that case. In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial.
It's important to note that a judge can overturn a jury's verdict in certain specific circumstances, such as if there wasn't enough evidence to support the verdict or if there were errors during the trial that prejudiced the outcome. However, this is relatively rare.
In this particular case, Judge Kaplan not only upheld the jury's verdict but also, in a later, separate trial determining damages for a different defamatory statement, ruled that Trump was precluded from arguing that he did not sexually assault Ms. Carroll, leaving only the issue of damages to be decided by the jury.
And that is all there is to say about that.
10 Aug 2025 11:08 am
Tiny,*Huey » 10 Aug 2025, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑ #real37x,
You are well over 20 questions on this thread. MOST of them are asking the same thing. Or, you can do one of two things, considering the OP has been resolved.
1. You can agree to answer questions on a one for one basis and stop editing quotes when you reply.
OR
2. Now, on this thread if you feel the answer to that question is somehow relevant you may go back to it, and without questions, take your stand, provide narrative and provide citations/attribjution as to why you think it is important to the subject. Make your own case, as most poster do on this forum.
Anything else will be moved to PG.
This is about who appealed what, and why...
You can't answer any of those questions
10 Aug 2025 11:26 am
Who would want the see the jury's verdict reduced?*Huey » 10 Aug 2025, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑ YOU specified it right there and it was specified in the OP:
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presided over the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
.
Judge Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict in that case.
10 Aug 2025 11:29 am
The cowardice is nauseating.*Huey » 10 Aug 2025, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑ Now the #real37x is trying to tell me what the OP is about. What a fool. All he is doing is he is incapable, lacks the intelligence, to make a case.
10 Aug 2025 11:33 am
It doesn't matter who. Kaplan UPHELD the verdict.
How hard is that for you to get through that TDS addled brain of yours???
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
10 Aug 2025 11:36 am
Blackvegetable » 10 Aug 2025, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
This is about who appealed what, and why...
You can't answer any of those questions
Let me help you out seeing how you are utterly confused here.
Trump made the appeal of the AMOUNT of the award based on the FACT that it was EXCESSIVE due to the jury findings. That answers both what and why.
See, this is easy.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
10 Aug 2025 11:37 am
*Beekeeper » 10 Aug 2025, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑ Let me help you out seeing how you are utterly confused here.
Trump made the appeal of the AMOUNT of the award based on the FACT that it was EXCESSIVE due to the jury findings. That answers both what and why.
See, this is easy.
the jury determined the amount, you **** idiot.
10 Aug 2025 11:39 am
So?? There as NO AWARD based on any "rape" that they found never happened.
And any other findings would have been an EXCESSIVE AWARD!!
So easy.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
10 Aug 2025 11:41 am
Not at all, you **** idiot.*Huey » 10 Aug 2025, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑ #real37x,
That's nice and it is still irrelevant to the title and the OP. Keeping in mind the OP does give attribution to Google AI. Kinda like when your article has (CNN) before the first sentence and YOU provide no link. Additionally, as you were shown earlier, the OP does specify what verdict was being talked about.
You have proven you lie, you have proven you are incapable of making your own case, and you finally agreed that Kalpan did not overturn the case.
With that said Trump is not a rapist felon.
That is why they provide you a link to AI's sources..
You're a coward, getting your dumb *** curbstomped..
10 Aug 2025 11:45 am
No....they DID find that rape occurred....that's why they awarded 2 million dollars..*Beekeeper » 10 Aug 2025, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑ But if that was the case, the JURY would have found RAPE occurred. They found exactly the opposite and that NO RAPE WAS PROVEN TO HAVE OCCURRED!!
See, so easy.
What they didn't conclude was that Grifty had inserted his diseased micropenis.....
The judge SPECIFICALLY rejected the "not rape" argument.
Who is online
In total there are 3331 users online :: 5 registered, 15 bots, and 3311 guests
Bots: DuckDuckGo, Baiduspider, NING, LCC, proximic, CriteoBot, app.hypefactors.com, ADmantX, YandexBot, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, linkfluence.com, bingbot, curl/7, Googlebot