You may run.Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2025, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑Google "spurious correlation"*Huey » 11 Aug 2025, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, I am:
More Guns, Less Crime: FBI Reports Significant Drop in Violent Crime
It wasn't just anti-gun academics like Abt who were predicting mayhem as the primary outcome of the Bruen decision. Virtually every gun control organization claimed Bruen was going to lead to a huge spike in shootings and murders. More people toting guns would inevitably lead to more violence, or so they asserted. Instead, according to the FBI's figures, violent crime decreased by 3% in 2023, with murders and non-negligent manslaughter declining by more than 11%.
The newly released data suggests that the decline in violent offenses accelerated in 2024, with a 4.9% drop in violent crime overall and a 14.9% decrease in murders and non-negligent manslaughter cases. As crime analyst Jeff Asher notes, that means that the homicide rate last year was slightly below what it was in 2019; the last year of "normal" crime data before the 2020 pandemic and riots helped lead to a record-setting rise in the violent crime and homicide rates.
https://bearingarms.com/camedwards/2025 ... e-n1229505
Looks like the "more guns means more crime" talking point is shot to hell. Let's go ammosexuals.

The relevant correlation is with firearms related crimes and pathology....
All I know is the amount go first time gun owners jump dramatically since COVID. And crime went down, not up.Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2025, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑The relevant correlation is with firearms related crimes and pathology....
Too much for you to google, just nod.
Since you want to make this about your ammosexuality..
If you're kinks include both guns AND launchers, are you Non-Binary, or Polyamorous?
Something irrelevant followed by running from a question you have repeatedly invited....*Huey » 11 Aug 2025, 1:08 pm » wrote: ↑ All I know is the amount go first time gun owners jump dramatically since COVID. And crime went down, not up.
Hear the non lethal Byrna works really well against those with an overinflated sense of their bought and paid for black belts. And they got to walk away.
Eventually.
Speaking of you running from a question:Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2025, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Something irrelevant followed by running from a question you have repeatedly invited....
Totally HooooeyVagina
Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2025, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑Something irrelevant followed by running from a question you have repeatedly invited....*Huey » 11 Aug 2025, 1:08 pm » wrote: ↑ All I know is the amount go first time gun owners jump dramatically since COVID. And crime went down, not up.
Hear the non lethal Byrna works really well against those with an overinflated sense of their bought and paid for black belts. And they got to walk away.
Eventually.
Totally HooooeyVagina
Where's the "courage" in firing one?*Huey » 11 Aug 2025, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
Speaking of the Judge, you may have SEEN one, but you were not brave enough to fire one.
Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2025, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑Where's the "courage" in firing one?*Huey » 11 Aug 2025, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
Speaking of the Judge, you may have SEEN one, but you were not brave enough to fire one.
So why are you running from the question?
You mean how you keep running from this one? Rules don't apply to narcissist.
Clearly not, Nov., 2022Vegas » 11 Aug 2025, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ You mean how you keep running from this one? Rules don't apply to narcissist.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Is the question asking for your definition or something else? Learn to read, dumb ***.
*Huey » 11 Aug 2025, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Nancy, I am a little hurt that it has been a few days without a new tribute thread from you. I mean I do have literally HUNDREDS of notifications from you over the last week, more than you have from me, but I am not feeling the love respecting the tribute threads.
You're slacking.
Damn BV, there is not a day in the last few weeks were you did not have more posts than me. Sunday was ALMOST triple digit.Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2025, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑Where are the numbers for notifications?*Huey » 11 Aug 2025, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑ I am not disputing the real numbers. You had 789 posts last week. helluva of a lot more than anyone on the forum. I am laughing at your justification for that.
Thurs, Fri and Sat you had 313 posts for a those three days.
I had 200.
Those are the only numbers that count.Give me your justification for posting, Neverrun.I am laughing at your justification for thatHow many notifications?Thurs, Fri and Sat you had 313 posts for a those three days. I had 200.3.5, please...you're innumerate...Those are the only numbers that count
Speaking of you running:Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Check out this steaming left footer....
https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=97251
what kind of a mincing pansy runs from her own THREAD TITLE?
You must know you're getting killed.*Huey » 12 Aug 2025, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Damn BV, there is not a day in the last few weeks were you did not have more posts than me. Sunday was ALMOST triple digit.
Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Check out this steaming left footer....
https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=97251
what kind of a mincing pansy runs from her own THREAD TITLE?