Liberal Forum

Vegas » 11 Aug 2025, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2025, 9:39 am

QED

Answer the question, Coward.

Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2025, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2025, 9:40 am

Yes.

Where's your definition?

First make a case as to why I should help you answer using my definition? Read the bold. Freudian slip.

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2025, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑
07 Aug 2025, 2:12 pm
Post your definition and we'll try to figure it out.

Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2025, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2025, 9:40 am

Answer the question, Coward.

Make a case, coward. 

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2025, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑
07 Aug 2025, 2:12 pm
Post your definition and we'll try to figure it out.

Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2025, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2025, 9:35 am

*Huey » 11 Aug 2025, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2025, 9:32 am

Mr Vegetable, I already gave you the link to figure other many notifications you had.  That is your argument, not mine.  You were able to figure out mine.  You should be able to do the same for the same time period concerning mine.

I used Thurs, Fri and Sat because yesterdays numbers are not available until tomorrow.

Mr Vegetable, I already gave you the link to figure other many notifications you had.

That still didn't answer the question, Coward.

That is your argument, not mine

No....it is the only way to determine who actually replies to more notifications. It is also the only way to place my output IN CONTEXT.

 

 

That still didn't answer the question, Coward.

Not my argument.  Made mine.  Mine is done.

No....it is the only way to determine who actually replies to more notifications. It is also the only way to place my output IN CONTEXT.

Go for it.  Not my argument.  It is your excuse, not mine.  

Now back to being a proud ammosexual.  If I want to discuss that instead of a non firearm this is another weapon I could have posted:



Olympic arms AR 15.  The one I inherited has a HALO site.  I want to remove the hand grip and go with a bipod stand.  I don't think I have any 5.56.  All .223.




 

*Huey » 11 Aug 2025, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2025, 8:40 am

Mr Vegetable, once again your lack of intelligence, reading skills, or both,  is on display.  That launcher is not a firearm.

are you sure?   
 

*Huey » 11 Aug 2025, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2025, 9:45 am

Not my argument.  Made mine.  Mine is done.

Go for it.  Not my argument.  It is your excuse, not mine.  

Now back to being a proud ammosexual.  If I want to discuss that instead of a non firearm this is another weapon I could have posted:



Olympic arms AR 15.  The one I inherited has a HALO site.  I want to remove the hand grip and go with a bipod stand.  I don't think I have any 5.56.  All .223.

Not my argument.  

You run from it.

Of course.

Made mine.  Mine is done.

yours is vaporized.

Now back to being a proud ammosexual

Check the thread title.

If I want to discuss that

Rules for thee....what rules?

this is another weapon I could have posted:

you could also post the identity of the party seeking to "over turn" the verdict in the E. Jean Carroll case....but you won't because it will make an *** of you...

Vegas » 11 Aug 2025, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2025, 9:41 am

Make a case, coward.

Post your definition and I'll show you.



 

Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2025, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2025, 10:32 am

Post your definition and I'll show you.

You just admitted that you need my help again.               

You dumb mother ****. 

Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2025, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2025, 10:30 am

*Huey » 11 Aug 2025, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2025, 9:45 am

Not my argument.  Made mine.  Mine is done.

Go for it.  Not my argument.  It is your excuse, not mine.  

Now back to being a proud ammosexual.  If I want to discuss that instead of a non firearm this is another weapon I could have posted:



Olympic arms AR 15.  The one I inherited has a HALO site.  I want to remove the hand grip and go with a bipod stand.  I don't think I have any 5.56.  All .223.

Not my argument.  

You run from it.

Of course.

Made mine.  Mine is done.

yours is vaporized.

Now back to being a proud ammosexual

Check the thread title.

If I want to discuss that

Rules for thee....what rules?

this is another weapon I could have posted:

you could also post the identity of the party seeking to "over turn" the verdict in the E. Jean Carroll case....but you won't because it will make an *** of you...

 

The party in question was already posted by you.  No need for me to do it. And you could explain the relevance to any argument I have successfully won.

If I was going to proudly go into full ammosexual mode I could post this one as opposed to the non lethal Byrna Launcher:



That is a Walther PPK chambered in 22 LR.  Google 22 LR.  Fun little pistol for plinking.
 

Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2025, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2025, 10:30 am

You run from it.

 

Speaking of you running. Check this out: 


Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors 

*Huey » 11 Aug 2025, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2025, 10:42 am

The party in question was already posted by you.  No need for me to do it. And you could explain the relevance to any argument I have successfully won.

If I was going to proudly go into full ammosexual mode I could post this one as opposed to the non lethal Byrna Launcher:



That is a Walther PPK chambered in 22 LR.  Google 22 LR.  Fun little pistol for plinking.

The party in question was already posted by you.

That's some real coward ****, right there..

The minute you do, you'll render yourself an ***.

If I was going to proudly go into full ammosexual

You already posted this crap.

Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2025, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2025, 11:03 am

That's some real coward ****, right there..

The minute you do, you'll render yourself an ***.

You already posted this crap.

And no, I am not going to help you. 




Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors 

*Huey » 11 Aug 2025, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2025, 10:42 am

The party in question was already posted by you.  No need for me to do it. And you could explain the relevance to any argument I have successfully won.

If I was going to proudly go into full ammosexual mode I could post this one as opposed to the non lethal Byrna Launcher:



That is a Walther PPK chambered in 22 LR.  Google 22 LR.  Fun little pistol for plinking.

And you could explain the relevance to any argument I have successfully won.

Tiny,

You assert you "successfully won" an argument in which you couldn't name the moving party or the post the verdict. In which you consigned the Judge's words on the subject - which contradict you directly- to PG.

The party is Team Grifty...

Why does it matter?

Because they wouldn't appeal a verdict which declared Grifty ISN'T a rapist.

For obvious **** reasons.

They have gone all the way to the feds. They've been laughed at at every turn.

Stupid ****. 

Vegas » 11 Aug 2025, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2025, 11:05 am

And no, I am not going to help you. 

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

no, I am not going to help you.  

Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2025, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2025, 11:03 am

*Huey » 11 Aug 2025, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2025, 10:42 am

The party in question was already posted by you.  No need for me to do it. And you could explain the relevance to any argument I have successfully won.

If I was going to proudly go into full ammosexual mode I could post this one as opposed to the non lethal Byrna Launcher:



That is a Walther PPK chambered in 22 LR.  Google 22 LR.  Fun little pistol for plinking.

The party in question was already posted by you.

That's some real coward ****, right there..

The minute you do, you'll render yourself an ***.

If I was going to proudly go into full ammosexual

You already posted this crap.

 

Nope, it is a different FIREARM, as opposed to a non lethal launcher, each time.

As a proud ammosexual I could have posted this:



That is an JTS AR M12.  A 12 gauge shotgun.  Not an assault rifle.  Too heavy and does not shoot an intermediate round.

Speaking of cowardice when you start making your own case instead making me do it in an argument I am not participating in you then can call me a coward.  Why are you scared?

*Huey » 11 Aug 2025, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2025, 11:14 am

Nope, it is a different FIREARM, as opposed to a non lethal launcher, each time.


 

Try to groom someone susceptible.

Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2025, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2025, 11:13 am

no, I am not going to help you.

    Copies me again. As always, he proves he has no thoughts of his own. 


And no, I am not going to help you. 




Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors 

Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2025, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2025, 11:11 am

*Huey » 11 Aug 2025, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2025, 10:42 am

The party in question was already posted by you.  No need for me to do it. And you could explain the relevance to any argument I have successfully won.

If I was going to proudly go into full ammosexual mode I could post this one as opposed to the non lethal Byrna Launcher:



That is a Walther PPK chambered in 22 LR.  Google 22 LR.  Fun little pistol for plinking.

And you could explain the relevance to any argument I have successfully won.

Tiny,

You assert you "successfully won" an argument in which you couldn't name the moving party or the post the verdict. In which you consigned the Judge's words on the subject - which contradict you directly- to PG.

The party is Team Grifty...

Why does it matter?

Because they wouldn't appeal a verdict which declared Grifty ISN'T a rapist.

For obvious **** reasons.

They have gone all the way to the feds. They've been laughed at at every turn.

Stupid ****. 

 

And who can forget the Henry.  Designed for war and self defense, fires around optimized for combat, and looks good.



That is a Henry Big Boy 45 Long Colt.  No kick to speak off and on target out of the box.

As far as your argument and question:

1.  You have not agreed to terms where you answer one question for everyone of your answered and pledged to stop editing the quotes of other when you reply.

2.  I have not argued against your point.  Never even brought it up.  That is your diversion and your case.  Stop being a coward and make your case yourself.

Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2025, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2025, 11:16 am

*Huey » 11 Aug 2025, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2025, 11:14 am

Nope, it is a different FIREARM, as opposed to a non lethal launcher, each time.



 

Try to groom someone susceptible.

 

This one I really, really like. One of my two go to EDCs.



That is a Ruger EC9S.  Sexy little piece but more importantly easy to keep on target.  it is a 7+1.  

 

Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2025, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2025, 11:16 am

Try to groom someone susceptible.

Begging for my help ^^^

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2025, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑
07 Aug 2025, 2:12 pm
Post your definition and we'll try to figure it out.

and

Blackvegetable » 54 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
54 minutes ago
Post your definition and I'll show you.