Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 7:06 am

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 7:04 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 7:04 am

These are my words.  Try again.  No matter what our words you use, (and they posted in this reply) this thread was never about physical strength ya retard.  That comment that has your tampon twisted is about your dring abilities.

Plus, I already showed your words making thinking this was abot strength.

You would get KILLED on a stand..

Flayed alive.


 

 

Run from the subject.  So, which hybrid did you pick out for yourself?  DOn't be a hypocrite.  Live by the rules you support and voted for.

 

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 7:08 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 7:08 am

Run from the subject.  So, which hybrid did you pick out for yourself?  DOn't be a hypocrite.  Live by the rules you support and voted for.

No...I haven't. 

You are running from your words.

Again.

Take a stand...

Does context matter?
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 7:10 am

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 7:08 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 7:08 am

Run from the subject.  So, which hybrid did you pick out for yourself?  DOn't be a hypocrite.  Live by the rules you support and voted for.

No...I haven't. 

You are running from your words.

Again.

Take a stand...

Does context matter?
 

 

Well, "Hybrids for thee but not for me" is your motto.  Hypocrite.  Every person who voted for the policy of forcing EVs, or Hybrids, on others, should be FORCED to own them first.  

I have reposted my words NUMEROJS times.  You keep deleting them.  That is on you,Sir.

The context of the thread is:

No matter what our words you use, (and they posted in this reply) this thread was never about physical strength ya retard.  That comment that has your tampon twisted is about your dring abilities.

Plus, I already showed your words making thinking this was abot strength.

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 7:14 am

[Well, "Hybrids for thee but not for me" is your motto.  Hypocrite.  Every person who voted for the policy of forcing EVs, or Hybrids, on others, should be FORCED to own them first.  

I have reposted my words NUMEROJS times.  You keep deleting them.  That is on you,Sir.]

The context of the thread is:

No matter what our words you use, (and they posted in this reply) this thread was never about physical strength ya retard.  That comment that has your tampon twisted is about your dring abilities.

Plus, I already showed your words making thinking this was abot strength.

There's no point in responding to the **** in brackets.

The "context" is yet another Infotainment move pandering to hypocritical MAGAt idiots, by a guy who can't drive and a few moths ago was pitching TESLAs.

As I pointed out in my first post.

YOU made it about me, and some undefined prowess required to step on a gas pedal.

I reminded you that whatever defines "Man", you have far less of it than I do.

 

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 7:21 am

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 7:14 am

[Well, "Hybrids for thee but not for me" is your motto.  Hypocrite.  Every person who voted for the policy of forcing EVs, or Hybrids, on others, should be FORCED to own them first.  

I have reposted my words NUMEROJS times.  You keep deleting them.  That is on you,Sir.]

The context of the thread is:

No matter what our words you use, (and they posted in this reply) this thread was never about physical strength ya retard.  That comment that has your tampon twisted is about your dring abilities.

Plus, I already showed your words making thinking this was abot strength.

 

 

Sorry, had to break my own rule.  There were more lies in BVs  Comment than I care to count.

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 7:25 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 7:25 am

Sorry, had to break my own rule.  There were more lies in BVs  Comment than I care to count.

Try to post one...

Tiny wuz smashed...


On his own thread.

Again.

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 7:26 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 7:26 am

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 7:25 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 7:25 am

Sorry, had to break my own rule.  There were more lies in BVs  Comment than I care to count.

Try to post one...

 

Yo humean in addition to what I have already pointed out?  LMAO!

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 7:34 am

Yo humean in addition to what I have already pointed out?  LMAO!

The only lies you've posted are your own.

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 7:35 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 7:35 am

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 7:34 am

Yo humean in addition to what I have already pointed out?  LMAO!

The only lies you've posted are your own.

 

Nope.  You can't post a single lie I have told don this thread.

So far I have shown you lied claiming I made this about physical strength.  You did because you are not intelligent enough to understand the OP and title.

So, when you find something I have lied about quote it properly and we can discuss it.

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 7:37 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 7:37 am

Nope.  You can't post a single lie I have told don this thread.

So far I have shown you lied claiming I made this about physical strength.  You did because you are not intelligent enough to understand the OP and title.

So, when you find something I have lied about quote it properly and we can discuss it.

This is from your second post, in which you can be seen diverting from the OP, and making it about me.

Those cars are more than you can handle.  

 

Blackvegetable » 13 Aug 2025, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 8:22 am

*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 7:50 am

https://www.reuters.com/business/autos- ... 025-07-16/

WASHINGTON, July 16 (Reuters) - Automakers face no fines for failures to meet fuel efficiency rules dating back to the 2022 model year under a law signed by President Donald Trump this month, U.S. regulators said.

The tax and budget bill approved by Trump ends penalties for not meeting Corporate Average Fuel Economy rules under a 1975 energy law.

We are not talking dainty, lady likes Vows but raw power.

Working his way down the Moron Wish List

 

That is not a lie.  Those are more car than you can handle.  STFU about diverting.  That is as hypocritical coming from you as one who supports forcing Americans to drive EVs but simply refuses to get one for himself.  Oh, wait, that is also you.  

*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 8:50 am

Blackvegetable » 13 Aug 2025, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 8:22 am

Working his way down the Moron Wish List

Nah.  Back in the day I owned a 73 Cougar with a 351 Cleveland with a 4 barrel.

i have owned 2 5.0 mustangs as well.  

Those cars are more than you can handle.  

 

I replied to your first post where you tried to make it about me.  **** idiot.

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 7:46 am

That is not a lie.  Those are more car than you can handle.  STFU about diverting.  That is as hypocritical coming from you as one 

Yes, it's a lie.

You make **** up.

STFU about diverting.  That is as hypocritical coming from you as 

This is ABOUT diverting, and the evidence that you do the diverting of which you complain.

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 7:50 am

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 7:46 am

That is not a lie.  Those are more car than you can handle.  STFU about diverting.  That is as hypocritical coming from you as one 

Yes, it's a lie.

You make **** up.

STFU about diverting.  That is as hypocritical coming from you as 

This is ABOUT diverting, and the evidence that you do the diverting of which you complain.

 

I showed your first post.  You tried to divert.  

I make **** up? You mean like you calling me a REMF?  You are too **** funny.  Not only is that made up after you been told a few details it is an outright lie.

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 7:53 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 7:53 am

I showed your first post.  You tried to divert.  

I make **** up? You mean like you calling me a REMF?  You are too **** funny.  Not only is that made up after you been told a few details it is an outright lie.

I showed your first post.  You tried to divert

It was on point.

I quoted you diverting.

I make **** up? 

Yea...I just showed you.

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 7:56 am

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 7:53 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 7:53 am

I showed your first post.  You tried to divert.  

I make **** up? You mean like you calling me a REMF?  You are too **** funny.  Not only is that made up after you been told a few details it is an outright lie.

I showed your first post.  You tried to divert

It was on point.

I quoted you diverting.

I make **** up? 

Yea...I just showed you.

 

 

Blackvegetable » 13 Aug 2025, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 8:22 am

*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 7:50 am

https://www.reuters.com/business/autos- ... 025-07-16/

WASHINGTON, July 16 (Reuters) - Automakers face no fines for failures to meet fuel efficiency rules dating back to the 2022 model year under a law signed by President Donald Trump this month, U.S. regulators said.

The tax and budget bill approved by Trump ends penalties for not meeting Corporate Average Fuel Economy rules under a 1975 energy law.

We are not talking dainty, lady likes Vows but raw power.

Working his way down the Moron Wish List

 

No sir, that is not on point.  That is your first point trying to make this about me.  You lose, Liar.  When the record is called into play you always lose.  Your lies get exposed.  

Now, go buy that EV and stop being a hypocrite.
 

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 7:57 am

No sir, that is not on point.  That is your first point trying to make this about me.  You lose, Liar.  When the record is called into play you always lose.  Your lies get exposed.  

Now, go buy that EV and stop being a hypocrite.

Are these words from the citation you quoted?

President Donald Trump this month, U.S. regulators said. 


The tax and budget bill approved by Trump
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 8:00 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 8:00 am

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 7:57 am

No sir, that is not on point.  That is your first point trying to make this about me.  You lose, Liar.  When the record is called into play you always lose.  Your lies get exposed.  

Now, go buy that EV and stop being a hypocrite.

Are these words from the citation you quoted?

President Donald Trump this month, U.S. regulators said. 


The tax and budget bill approved by Trump
 

 

You tell me.  It is your case.  That is not the proper way to start.

Now go buy your EV.  
 

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 8:04 am

You tell me.  It is your case.  That is not the proper way to start.

Now go buy your EV.

No...it's yours.

That is not the proper way to start.

You run.


Case made.


Game, Set, Match....again.

SS, DD
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 8:06 am

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 8:04 am

You tell me.  It is your case.  That is not the proper way to start.

Now go buy your EV.

No...it's yours.

That is not the proper way to start.

You run.


Case made.


Game, Set, Match....again.

SS, DD
 

 

I don't have an EV.  Don't want one. But by all means since you want to force me into one go buy one first.

Not sure what you think you won.  I guess it makes sense in that mess you call a brain.