Try to not divert - 'k?*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑ I don't have an EV. Don't want one. But by all means since you want to force me into one go buy one first.
Not sure what you think you won. I guess it makes sense in that mess you call a brain.
Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑Try to not divert - 'k?*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑ I don't have an EV. Don't want one. But by all means since you want to force me into one go buy one first.
Not sure what you think you won. I guess it makes sense in that mess you call a brain.

Is this your post?
PS. Don't now what Vic means but I do have a VIC card for Harris Teeter
Fuel efficient cars aren't going anywhere. But for the next few years we will not be under mandates that so many EVs have to built by whatever year or tax subsidies to buy them.Cannonpointer » 13 Aug 2025, 5:21 pm » wrote: ↑Without the CAFE standards, I predict you will definitely see more muscle. But there is a YUGE market for high fuel efficiency vehicles, and automakers will still be looking to fill that market. The fuel efficient cars will not become less-so. But the fuel inefficient cars WILL become more so.*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.reuters.com/business/autos- ... 025-07-16/
WASHINGTON, July 16 (Reuters) - Automakers face no fines for failures to meet fuel efficiency rules dating back to the 2022 model year under a law signed by President Donald Trump this month, U.S. regulators said.
The tax and budget bill approved by Trump ends penalties for not meeting Corporate Average Fuel Economy rules under a 1975 energy law.
We are not talking dainty, lady likes Vows but raw power.
Not gonna lower the average fuel efficiency by much, across the market. But it's gonna take the worries out, which will translate tomore muscle.
That's my prediction.
Wrong thread.
Blackvegetable » 13 Aug 2025, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑Take a stand on it...*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑ The bill also eliminated the 7500 tax credit for buying EVs enacted by Biden.
Did you benefit when you bought your hybrid?
*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.reuters.com/business/autos- ... 025-07-16/
WASHINGTON, July 16 (Reuters) - Automakers face no fines for failures to meet fuel efficiency rules dating back to the 2022 model year under a law signed by President Donald Trump this month, U.S. regulators said.
The tax and budget bill approved by Trump ends penalties for not meeting Corporate Average Fuel Economy rules under a 1975 energy law.
We are not talking dainty, lady likes Vows but raw power.
Did you have some sorta questions concerning the OP. YOU did post a partial quote picked from the middle of it.
I took a clear stand on the OP.*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑
Did you have some sorta questions concerning the OP. YOU did post a partial quote picked from the middle of it.
I have been reading through the threads. Wow. @Blackvegetable 's double standards are worse than usual this morning. His projections are displayed daily anyway, but sometimes they are just plain over the top. Like this morning. When that happens, we know Mary is here. However, Mary has been here for the past 10 days. Has nuclear Nancy stormed in?
Oh, yea...
Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑I took a clear stand on the OP.*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑
Did you have some sorta questions concerning the OP. YOU did post a partial quote picked from the middle of it.
That is not a clear stand on the OP. That is a question. Is something confusing you?Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 8:00 am » wrote: ↑Are these words from the citation you quoted?*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑
No sir, that is not on point. That is your first point trying to make this about me. You lose, Liar. When the record is called into play you always lose. Your lies get exposed.
Now, go buy that EV and stop being a hypocrite.
President Donald Trump this month, U.S. regulators said.
The tax and budget bill approved by Trump
Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑Oh, yea...
The guy whose proxies denegrated a decorated combat veteran...
You guys still hang?
*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑ Don't know what you are talking abut. Start a thread. And be specific. I'll respond.
Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑ Don't know what you are talking abut. Start a thread. And be specific. I'll respond.
You?
Master Reader?
Mister Insight?
Try to remember this.
Yea...*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑
That is not a clear stand on the OP. That is a question. Is something confusing you?
Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑ Yea...
Can't figure out why you don't quote my first post.
I believe what rational people are asking is something that would be rooted in intelligence.Working his way down the Moron Wish List
You're quite vague about what confuses you..*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑ Don't know what you are talking abut. Start a thread. And be specific. I'll respond.
As you can see below I have quoted your first post. And the comment above pertains to your the second quote in this repy. Go ahead and run now.Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑Yea...*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑
That is not a clear stand on the OP. That is a question. Is something confusing you?
Can't figure out why you don't quote my first post.
*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑I took a clear stand on the OP.*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑
Did you have some sorta questions concerning the OP. YOU did post a partial quote picked from the middle of it.
That is not a clear stand on the OP. That is a question. Is something confusing you?Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 8:00 am » wrote: ↑Are these words from the citation you quoted?*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑
No sir, that is not on point. That is your first point trying to make this about me. You lose, Liar. When the record is called into play you always lose. Your lies get exposed.
Now, go buy that EV and stop being a hypocrite.
President Donald Trump this month, U.S. regulators said.
The tax and budget bill approved by Trump
*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑That is not a lie. Those are more car than you can handle. STFU about diverting. That is as hypocritical coming from you as one who supports forcing Americans to drive EVs but simply refuses to get one for himself. Oh, wait, that is also you.Blackvegetable » 13 Aug 2025, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑Working his way down the Moron Wish List*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.reuters.com/business/autos- ... 025-07-16/
WASHINGTON, July 16 (Reuters) - Automakers face no fines for failures to meet fuel efficiency rules dating back to the 2022 model year under a law signed by President Donald Trump this month, U.S. regulators said.
The tax and budget bill approved by Trump ends penalties for not meeting Corporate Average Fuel Economy rules under a 1975 energy law.
We are not talking dainty, lady likes Vows but raw power.
I replied to your first post where you tried to make it about me. **** idiot.*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑
Nah. Back in the day I owned a 73 Cougar with a 351 Cleveland with a 4 barrel.
i have owned 2 5.0 mustangs as well.
Those cars are more than you can handle.
Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑You're quite vague about what confuses you..*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑ Don't know what you are talking abut. Start a thread. And be specific. I'll respond.
I have no clue what you are along about or what it has to do with the topic. Proxies? Denigrated a combat veteran? So vague.Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑Oh, yea...
The guy whose proxies denegrated a decorated combat veteran...
You guys still hang?