Liberal Forum

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 10:13 am

As you can see below I have quoted your first post.  And the comment above pertains to your the second quote in this repy.  Go ahead and run now.

You lied.

I took my clear and unambigous stand in my very first reply.

You diverted.

When caught, you blamed me.

You lied.

Then you tried to claim my first post was a diversion, which is patently stupid as it directly addresses the OP.

As demonstrated. 

 

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 10:16 am

I have no clue what you are along about or what it has to do with the topic.  Proxies?  Denigrated a combat veteran?  So vague.

It's your gif.

Do you want to run from it now?


 

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 10:17 am

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 10:13 am

As you can see below I have quoted your first post.  And the comment above pertains to your the second quote in this repy.  Go ahead and run now.

You lied.

I took my clear and unambigous stand in my very first reply.

You diverted.

When caught, you blamed me.

You lied.

Then you tried to claim my first post was a diversion, which is patently stupid as it directly addresses the OP.

As demonstrated. 

 

 

Sure BV, Sure.

Sure, BV, Sure.

And you lied claiming I did not post your first post (diversion).  Your first post (diversion) was not on topic.

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 8:37 am

*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 7:50 am

https://www.reuters.com/business/autos- ... 025-07-16/



WASHINGTON, July 16 (Reuters) - Automakers face no fines for failures to meet fuel efficiency rules dating back to the 2022 model year under a law signed by President Donald Trump this month, U.S. regulators said.


The tax and budget bill approved by Trump ends penalties for not meeting Corporate Average Fuel Economy rules under a 1975 energy law.

We are not talking dainty, lady likes Vows but raw power. 
 


 

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 8:32 am

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 8:13 am

Wrong thread.

Your diversion.


 

Did you have some sorta questions concerning the OP.  YOU did post a partial quote picked from the middle of it.  
 

 

 

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 8:00 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 8:00 am

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 7:57 am

No sir, that is not on point.  That is your first point trying to make this about me.  You lose, Liar.  When the record is called into play you always lose.  Your lies get exposed.  

Now, go buy that EV and stop being a hypocrite.

Are these words from the citation you quoted?

President Donald Trump this month, U.S. regulators said. 


The tax and budget bill approved by Trump
 

 

As you can see they when I repost the OP, yes they are a partial sentence from the op.

This is the entire sentence IN CONTEXT:

Automakers face no fines for failures to meet fuel efficiency rules dating back to the 2022 model year under a law signed by President Donald Trump this month, U.S. regulators said.


Please post your problem with it.

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 10:19 am

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 10:16 am

I have no clue what you are along about or what it has to do with the topic.  Proxies?  Denigrated a combat veteran?  So vague.

It's your gif.

Do you want to run from it now?


 

 

I don't know what you are claiming I am running from.  You refuse to post who the combat vet or who my proxies.  There is nothing to run from.  

I guess you got nuttin'.

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 10:25 am

I don't know what you are claiming I am running from.  You refuse to post who the combat vet or who my proxies.  There is nothing to run from.  

I guess you got nuttin'.

Did you post a gif?

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 10:26 am

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 10:25 am

I don't know what you are claiming I am running from.  You refuse to post who the combat vet or who my proxies.  There is nothing to run from.  

I guess you got nuttin'.

Did you post a gif?

 

Yup.  Now, what combat and proxies are you talking about?

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 10:29 am

Yup.  Now, what combat and proxies are you talking about?

Who is featured in your gif?

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 10:37 am

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 10:29 am

Yup.  Now, what combat and proxies are you talking about?

Who is featured in your gif?

 

Get to the point.  I have answered your enough you questions:

Please post what you are talking about.  Take a stand.

PS.  I already know where you **** up.

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 10:44 am

Get to the point.  .

This is about YOUR confusion.

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 11:00 am

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 10:44 am

Get to the point.  .

This is about YOUR confusion.

 

I adjust going to put your stupidity on display.  That is a GIF of Clint Eastwoods Character from Gran Torino.  He is a war veteran.  Sotell us what your problem is.  I already know.  I want you to have NO WIGGLE ROOM when I slam your *******.

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 11:02 am

I adjust going to put your stupidity on display.  That is a GIF of Clint Eastwoods Character from Gran Torino.  He is a war veteran.  Sotell us what your problem is.  I already know.  I want you to have NO WIGGLE ROOM when I slam your *******.

Yea...my bad...your diversion was incredibly vague...

The observation, however, was spot on, Swiftboating REMF...


 

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 11:03 am

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 11:02 am

I adjust going to put your stupidity on display.  That is a GIF of Clint Eastwoods Character from Gran Torino.  He is a war veteran.  Sotell us what your problem is.  I already know.  I want you to have NO WIGGLE ROOM when I slam your *******.

Yea...my bad...your diversion was incredibly vague...

The observation, however, was spot on, Swiftboating REMF...


 

 

         

Yo stupid ROTC waste of ****.  That is not calling the character a hypocrite.  That is the character calling someone else a hypocrite.

You are one dumb ****.  

Ot doesn't get any more REMF than one prepared to run off to Canada with daddy if drafted.  

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 11:06 am

 

You know why.

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 11:10 am

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 11:06 am

              

Yo stupid ROTC waste of ****.  That is not calling the character a hypocrite.  That is the character calling someone else a hypocrite.

You are one dumb ****.  

Ot doesn't get any more REMF than one prepared to run off to Canada with daddy if drafted.  
 

You know why.

 

I can't believe you are so **** stupid to believe that meme was calling the character a hypocrite.

What a jackass you are.

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 10:23 am

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 10:17 am

 

As demonstrated.

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 8:37 am

*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 7:50 am

https://www.reuters.com/business/autos- ... 025-07-16/

WASHINGTON, July 16 (Reuters) - Automakers face no fines for failures to meet fuel efficiency rules dating back to the 2022 model year under a law signed by President Donald Trump this month, U.S. regulators said.

The tax and budget bill approved by Trump ends penalties for not meeting Corporate Average Fuel Economy rules under a 1975 energy law.

We are not talking dainty, lady likes Vows but raw power.

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 8:32 am

Your diversion.

Did you have some sorta questions concerning the OP.  YOU did post a partial quote picked from the middle of it.

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 8:00 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 8:00 am

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 7:57 am

No sir, that is not on point.  That is your first point trying to make this about me.  You lose, Liar.  When the record is called into play you always lose.  Your lies get exposed.  

Now, go buy that EV and stop being a hypocrite.

Are these words from the citation you quoted?

President Donald Trump this month, U.S. regulators said. 

The tax and budget bill approved by Trump

As you can see they when I repost the OP, yes they are a partial sentence from the op.

This is the entire sentence IN CONTEXT:

Automakers face no fines for failures to meet fuel efficiency rules dating back to the 2022 model year under a law signed by President Donald Trump this month, U.S. regulators said.

Please post your problem with it.

Yes BV, those words are a partial part of sentence I posted in the OP.

What abot them?

Why you running again?
 

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 11:17 am

Yes BV, those words are a partial part of sentence I posted in the OP.

What abot them?

Why you running again?

They are the RELEVANT elements of your post to which I responded.

I don't need to quote the entire **** book.
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 11:20 am

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 11:17 am

Yes BV, those words are a partial part of sentence I posted in the OP.

What abot them?

Why you running again?

They are the RELEVANT elements of your post to which I responded.

I don't need to quote the entire **** book.

****.  If that was the case that is what you would have said yesterday.  

Anyway, after your meme fiasco I understand how truely **** stupid your are.  
 

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 11:22 am

****.  If that was the case that is what you would have said yesterday.  

Anyway, after your meme fiasco, I understand how truely **** stupid your are.

Stop interpreting, Tiny .

You are **** stupid.

after your meme fiasco

Fiasco is your AI thread...

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 11:26 am

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 11:22 am

****.  If that was the case that is what you would have said yesterday.  

Anyway, after your meme fiasco, I understand how truely **** stupid your are.

Stop interpreting, Tiny .

You are **** stupid.

after your meme fiasco

Fiasco is your AI thread...

Although you are one dumb ****, your opinion is noted and filed appropriately.  


 
 
 

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 11:29 am

Although you are one dumb ****, your opinion is noted and filed appropriately.  

Tiny,

Your AI thread is a classic...

You actually consigned the relevant text of the opinion you know nothing about to PG.