Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:48 pm

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:47 pm

Did he just say "He hasn't even tried to challenge Merchan."

That's odd.

https://www.npr.org/2025/06/11/nx-s1-54 ... my-daniels

keep scrolling.

 

Nah.  You said what you said.  Carry on.

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:48 pm

1.  You are putting words in my mouth.

2.  read this

https://www.npr.org/2025/06/11/nx-s1-54 ... my-daniels

Mic Drop

 You are putting words in my mouth.

 :die:  

https://www.npr.org/2025/06/11/nx-s1-54 ... stormy-dai



It's a venue debate...



​​​​​​​

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:49 pm

Nah.  You said what you said.  Carry on.

 

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:47 pm

Did he just say "He hasn't even tried to challenge Merchan."

That's odd.

https://www.npr.org/2025/06/11/nx-s1-54 ... my-daniels

You got Bv's number.     

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:52 pm

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:49 pm

Nah.  You said what you said.  Carry on.

 

 

 

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:49 pm

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:48 pm

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:47 pm

Did he just say "He hasn't even tried to challenge Merchan."

That's odd.

https://www.npr.org/2025/06/11/nx-s1-54 ... my-daniels

keep scrolling.


 

Nah.  You said what you said.  Carry on.

 

 

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:48 pm

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:36 pm

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:19 pm

I am not stopping you from discussing the Carroll case.  I said have it.  I am not obliged to participate.  

Your meltdown Is growing.

Tiny,

The premise of this thread is that his fraud conviction is so flimsy that you, PedoRoad and some couchsurfing MAGAt can knock holes in it.

That is every bit as stupid as it appears.

The evidence is that Grifty has yet to pursue further appeal of a FELONY conviction...in favor of driving hard to reduce a 2 million dollar civil judgment which you insist absolves him of rape.
 


 

1.  You are putting words in my mouth.

2.  read this

https://www.npr.org/2025/06/11/nx-s1-54 ... my-daniels

Mic Drop

 

Difference between you and I is I am posting in full quotes, in context with. no edits and a link.  You have a screen shot that does not tell the story or show the edit and admission when it happened.Next, YOU twice lied that Trump has yet to pursue appeal of the felony conviction.  

 

roadkill » 14 Aug 2025, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:52 pm

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:47 pm

Did he just say "He hasn't even tried to challenge Merchan."

That's odd.

https://www.npr.org/2025/06/11/nx-s1-54 ... my-daniels

You got Bv's number.     

 

If you kept gong you will see he actually said it twice and now he is trying to pretend he didn't.  He using a screen shot of something I said but I had corrected when I saw the error.  He leaves that part out.  It is from sometime ago.  Notice he doesn't use a link.

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:55 pm

Difference between you and I is I 

You LIED about words you changed.

That really speaks to your integrity.

I corrected myself, unprompted.

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:57 pm

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:55 pm

Difference between you and I is I 

You LIED about words you changed.

That really speaks to your integrity.

I corrected myself, unprompted.

 

No,  did not.  What speaks to low integrity the fact you refuse to post a link to back up your charges.  You got nothing.  TWICE you lied about the appeals of the Sorry Daniel case.  Twice.  Now go ahead and admit your were wrong and correct it.

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 12:59 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:59 pm

 

You know why.

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 1:01 pm

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 12:59 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:59 pm

 

You know why.

 

SF, you are about to be **** head stomped into your own driveway.

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 1:02 pm

SF, you are about to be **** head stomped into your own driveway.

Tiny,

I corrected myself on the initial appeal.

Unprompted.

You should read your citation. It doesn't mean what you hoped it might mean when you read the headline.
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:57 pm

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:55 pm

Difference between you and I is I 

You LIED about words you changed.

That really speaks to your integrity.

I corrected myself, unprompted.

 

Once you found your balls and clarified I did as promised:

viewtopic.php?p=2751395&liberalforum=e8 ... 9#p2751395

You lose.  I will repos that every tie you don't have the balls to provide a link.

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 1:05 pm

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 1:02 pm

SF, you are about to be **** head stomped into your own driveway.

Tiny,

I corrected myself on the initial appeal.

Unprompted.

You should read your citation. It doesn't mean what you hoped it might mean when you read the headline.
 

 

TWICE you said it. Not once.  ANdnot once di you admit you made an error.  You just changed your tune.  Sorry, your **** rule.  Those are your words.  

They stand as is.

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 1:06 pm

Once you found your balls and clarified I did as promised:


 

No...

It wasn't your weasel version of your obligation.

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 1:07 pm

TWICE you said it. Not once.  ANdnot once di you admit you made an error.  You just changed your tune.  Sorry, your **** rule.  Those are your words.  

They stand as is.

I corrected it, unprompted.

It's over, Sheilagh. 

They stand as is.

That's YOUR rule.


And, apparently, you aren't subject to it.

 

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 1:07 pm

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 1:06 pm

Once you found your balls and clarified I did as promised:



 

No...

It wasn't your weasel version of your obligation.

 

Your opinion is noted and your lack of integrity to us links is also noted.  

I did it as a man would.  Not what a sniveling coward like you would do.

Now back to YOUR **** on the topic.  

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 1:10 pm

Your opinion is noted and your lack of integrity to us links is also noted.  

I did it as a man would.  Not what a sniveling coward like you would do.

Now back to YOUR **** on the topic.

Tiny,

THIS is "lack of integrity"...

"not anymore"

Now double up by questioning the evidence.


 

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 1:09 pm

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 1:07 pm

TWICE you said it. Not once.  ANdnot once di you admit you made an error.  You just changed your tune.  Sorry, your **** rule.  Those are your words.  

They stand as is.

I corrected it, unprompted.

It's over, Sheilagh. 

They stand as is.

That's YOUR rule.


And, apparently, you aren't subject to it.

 

 

Neither one of those posts are corrected.  Try again.

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:29 pm

roadkill » 14 Aug 2025, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:12 pm

It's not. And you would know that if you weren't a tard.

He already took Carroll to federal court..

He hasn't even tried to challenge Merchan..
 

 

 

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:36 pm

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:19 pm

I am not stopping you from discussing the Carroll case.  I said have it.  I am not obliged to participate.  

Your meltdown Is growing.

Tiny,

The premise of this thread is that his fraud conviction is so flimsy that you, PedoRoad and some couchsurfing MAGAt can knock holes in it.

That is every bit as stupid as it appears.

The evidence is that Grifty has yet to pursue further appeal of a FELONY conviction...in favor of driving hard to reduce a 2 million dollar civil judgment which you insist absolves him of rape.
 

 

 

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 1:15 pm

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 1:10 pm

Your opinion is noted and your lack of integrity to us links is also noted.  

I did it as a man would.  Not what a sniveling coward like you would do.

Now back to YOUR **** on the topic.

Tiny,

THIS is "lack of integrity"...

"not anymore"

Now double up by questioning the evidence.


 

 

And the loser continues to tell less than HLF the story.

You were told once you clarified what the **** you were talking I would make corrections.  I did.  

And I did like a man.  With  links.  You are trying to lie about what the circumstances were..

We are done here.  I am off for my rehab walk.  Tell me Mr Expert, what pistol should I carry today?

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 1:16 pm

Neither one of those posts are corrected.  Try again.

Remember your rule..

Repeat, never need....ever..