Stop begging for my help.Vegas » 14 Aug 2025, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑ How many times before that?
Why do you always need to repeat yourself to narcissists? - YouTube
You have a definition, in my words.Vegas » 14 Aug 2025, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
God the blatant projections. You make it so obvious. Just admit that you don't know. Put yourself out of your misery.
Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑The "story" is you asserting that your words are not your words "anymore".
Do you understand this?
It doesn't require links.
Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑Tiny,*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑ I just reposted your words. You lied about the lie. You can still go correct them. I will acknowledge when you do. Unlike, I do what I say.
As proven by the circumstances of your screenshot.
I corrected myself.
I need only do so once.
The point actually stands.
Grifty has not appealed since he was sentenced.
You should read, and try to understand, your own citation.
Yup, exactly. Whenever you see him using screen shots and refuses to post link he is hiding something and lying by omission.Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑ And the loser continues to tell less than HLF the story.
You were told once you clarified what the **** you were talking I would make corrections. I did.
And I did like a man. With links. You are trying to lie about what the circumstances were..
We are done here. I am off for my rehab walk. Tell me Mr Expert, what pistol should I carry today?We are done here. I am off for my rehab walk. Tell me Mr Expert, what pistol should I carry today?
I would have no reason to know what a man who huddles in fear - even when "running" - packs in his manpurse, fanny pack, or whatever.
Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑ You have a definition, in my words.
You've never even posted an example.
Post the rule, and your stipulation.*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Nah you didn't. You didn't say oops, I was wrong and go back and correct the record. You let it stand in the hopes that no one would catch it. Until you correct those posts the record stands as is.
There's a lie, right there.*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Yup, exactly. Whenever you see him using screen shots and refuses to post link he is hiding something and lying by omission.
Ihave none of those. Obviously, you the Firearm expert has no Clue what an IWB is. I have only been talking about it for a few days now.Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑ And the loser continues to tell less than HLF the story.
You were told once you clarified what the **** you were talking I would make corrections. I did.
And I did like a man. With links. You are trying to lie about what the circumstances were..
We are done here. I am off for my rehab walk. Tell me Mr Expert, what pistol should I carry today?We are done here. I am off for my rehab walk. Tell me Mr Expert, what pistol should I carry today?
I would have no reason to know what a man who huddles in fear - even when "running" - packs in his manpurse, fanny pack, or whatever.
We don't have to do it at all.
Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑It doesn't require links.
It demands that you acknowledge your lack of integrity.
*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Ihave none of those. Obviously, you the Firearm expert has no Clue what an IWB is. I have only been talking about it for a few days now.
Carry on.
I don't peruse smmosexual love aids catalogues...have only been talking about it for a few days now
Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ We don't have to do it at all.
You have to kill yourself.
Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑Post the rule, and your stipulation.*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Nah you didn't. You didn't say oops, I was wrong and go back and correct the record. You let it stand in the hopes that no one would catch it. Until you correct those posts the record stands as is.
You have a strict rule about repeating yourself.
Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑There's a lie, right there.*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Yup, exactly. Whenever you see him using screen shots and refuses to post link he is hiding something and lying by omission.
Post an example...you know the format.
Your integrity issue is manifest in the evidence.*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ If I was having an integrity issue I would not have posted a link to the thread you refuse to link to.
I'm good. The next you bring this up I am just going to post our sreen shot on that thread.
Yea...your rule..*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 2:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Yor format? Or the one most people with honor and integrity use?
Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 2:19 pm » wrote: ↑Your integrity issue is manifest in the evidence.*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ If I was having an integrity issue I would not have posted a link to the thread you refuse to link to.
I'm good. The next you bring this up I am just going to post our sreen shot on that thread.
Are photographs admissible as evidence?