Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 13 Aug 2025, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2025, 2:13 pm

Not again...

A) the guy's a moron.

B) there is no statute of limitations issue. To understand why, read about Hope Hick's testimony.

You people are so **** g'ddammned stupid.

**** you ya lying traitor *** bastard.

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 11:21 am

BV is so **** stupid I posted the below meme and that **** thought I was calling the Character in Gran Torino a hypocrite.  He ranted and rave about how I was disparaging a decorated war veteran.  The **** doesn't understand that it is the character calling SOMEONE else a hypocrite, in this case, BV.  Honest to god BV is dumber than dirt. Definitely a waste of sperm

Stump-Stupid eh.  It could be part of the master plan here to keep things stirred up.   

roadkill » 14 Aug 2025, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:02 pm

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 11:21 am

BV is so **** stupid I posted the below meme and that **** thought I was calling the Character in Gran Torino a hypocrite.  He ranted and rave about how I was disparaging a decorated war veteran.  The **** doesn't understand that it is the character calling SOMEONE else a hypocrite, in this case, BV.  Honest to god BV is dumber than dirt. Definitely a waste of sperm

Stump-Stupid eh.  It could be part of the master plan here to keep things stirred up.   

 

There are better ways than making yourself look like the class retard.
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 11:18 am

So, you don't have one...

Interesting...

His felony conviction is a lower priority than a $2 million dollar civil judgment...which according to several @*IdiotPussies EXONERATES him of rape...

So dum dum...if it's a repub that's accused of rape with NO evidence they're automatically guilty. In fact Mr. dum dum...why don't you post the evidence. (we all know Bv has no such evidence)Cause a liar doesn't need evidence.

If accusations = guilt Bill Clinton would be serving life in prison.  
 
 

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:03 pm

There are better ways than making yourself look like the class retard.

Then I'm sure you can explain why appealing the Carroll judgment was a higher priority than appealing his felony conviction.

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:10 pm

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:03 pm

There are better ways than making yourself look like the class retard.

Then I'm sure you can explain why appealing the Carroll judgment was a higher priority than appealing his felony conviction.

 

Neither one of can.  Have at it.  Plus, this thread is not about the Carroll case. I know you have been struggling with that.

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:10 pm

Then I'm sure you can explain why appealing the Carroll judgment was a higher priority than appealing his felony conviction.

It's not. And you would know that if you weren't a tard.
 

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:03 pm

There are better ways than making yourself look like the class retard.

Yep...the tard play isn't working the hyper tard.      

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 10:55 am

You will probably have to explain to him what a ratchet is and does.

 

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:12 pm

Neither one of can.  Have at it.  Plus, this thread is not about the Carroll case. I know you have been struggling with that.

Neither one of can. 

I'm sure that answered some question, somewhere. 

Plus, this thread is not about 

Instead of making every thread about me, you should begin by listing "forbidden" topics....

As a service to everyone. 

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:17 pm

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:12 pm

Neither one of can.  Have at it.  Plus, this thread is not about the Carroll case. I know you have been struggling with that.

Neither one of can. 

I'm sure that answered some question, somewhere. 

Plus, this thread is not about 

Instead of making every thread about me, you should begin by listing "forbidden" topics....

As a service to everyone. 

 

I am not stopping you from discussing the Carroll case.  I said have it.  I am not obliged to participate.  ;)

Your meltdown Is growing.

roadkill » 14 Aug 2025, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:12 pm

It's not. And you would know that if you weren't a tard.

He already took Carroll to federal court..

He hasn't even tried to challenge Merchan..
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:29 pm

He already took Carroll to federal court..

He hasn't even tried to challenge Merchan..

I guess it must be on a "need to know" basis...and you've never had a need to know the truth.

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:19 pm

I am not stopping you from discussing the Carroll case.  I said have it.  I am not obliged to participate.  

Your meltdown Is growing.

Tiny,

The premise of this thread is that his fraud conviction is so flimsy that you, PedoRoad and some couchsurfing MAGAt can knock holes in it.

That is every bit as stupid as it appears.

The evidence is that Grifty has yet to pursue further appeal of a FELONY conviction...in favor of driving hard to reduce a 2 million dollar civil judgment which you insist absolves him of rape.
 

roadkill » 14 Aug 2025, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:33 pm

I guess it must be on a "need to know" basis...and you've never had a need to know the truth.

He actually challenged Merchan, but Merchan upheld Merchan.

Now he's "thinking" about it...

roadkill » 14 Aug 2025, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:12 pm

It's not. And you would know that if you weren't a tard.

PedoRoad,

Where's he putting his money?
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:39 pm

PedoRoad,

Where's he putting his money?

**** your questions. God forbid you should answer any. 

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:29 pm

roadkill » 14 Aug 2025, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:12 pm

It's not. And you would know that if you weren't a tard.

He already took Carroll to federal court..

He hasn't even tried to challenge Merchan..
 

 

roadkill » 14 Aug 2025, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:33 pm

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:29 pm

He already took Carroll to federal court..

He hasn't even tried to challenge Merchan..

I guess it must be on a "need to know" basis...and you've never had a need to know the truth.

 

Did he just say "He hasn't even tried to challenge Merchan."

That's odd.

https://www.npr.org/2025/06/11/nx-s1-54 ... els​​​​​​​

Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2025, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:36 pm

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:19 pm

I am not stopping you from discussing the Carroll case.  I said have it.  I am not obliged to participate.  

Your meltdown Is growing.

Tiny,

The premise of this thread is that his fraud conviction is so flimsy that you, PedoRoad and some couchsurfing MAGAt can knock holes in it.

That is every bit as stupid as it appears.

The evidence is that Grifty has yet to pursue further appeal of a FELONY conviction...in favor of driving hard to reduce a 2 million dollar civil judgment which you insist absolves him of rape.
 

 

1.  You are putting words in my mouth.

2.  read this

https://www.npr.org/2025/06/11/nx-s1-54 ... my-daniels

​​​​​​​Mic Drop

*Huey » 14 Aug 2025, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2025, 12:47 pm

Did he just say "He hasn't even tried to challenge Merchan."

That's odd.

https://www.npr.org/2025/06/11/nx-s1-54 ... my-daniels

​​​​​​​keep scrolling.