Liberal Forum

*Huey » 15 Aug 2025, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2025, 1:12 pm

better than yours.  

Carry on.

No..I have one..

You don't. 

but here's some more for you


Deletion of Jan 6 charges database appears to violate the law

https://www.citizensforethics.org/legal ... e-the-law/
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Aug 2025, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2025, 1:15 pm

No..I have one..

You don't. 

but here's some more for you

Deletion of Jan 6 charges database appears to violate the law

https://www.citizensforethics.org/legal ... e-the-law/

that’s nice.  Yet, as usual you can’t verbalize or take a stand. 

When you do so I will take the time to do so.  

*Huey » 15 Aug 2025, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2025, 1:19 pm

that’s nice.  Yet, as usual you can’t verbalize or take a stand. 

When you do so I will take the time to do so.

I did.

I told buck that his statement was ****, and why....with detail.

You snarked and posted some propaganda.

Because you're an idiot who doesn't know anything. 


 

Blackvegetable » 15 Aug 2025, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2025, 1:22 pm

I did.

I told buck that his statement was ****, and why....with detail.

You snarked and posted some propaganda.

Because you're an idiot who doesn't know anything.

And I posted where it wasn’t.  

Sir, I understand your need to lash out.  It has been an awful few weeks for your ego.
 

*Huey » 15 Aug 2025, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2025, 1:26 pm

And I posted where it wasn’t.  

Sir, I understand your need to lash out.  It has been an awful few weeks for your ego.

No, you didn't. 

You posted a link....to House propaganda.

Like the little tool you are, Little Tool.


 

Blackvegetable » 15 Aug 2025, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2025, 1:12 pm

Read on...

I did………
These instances highlight concerns about the potential loss or suppression of information related to the January 6th Capitol attack and the investigations surrounding it. 

oh man you was running the committee?

BuckNaked » 15 Aug 2025, 1:28 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2025, 1:28 pm

I did………
These instances highlight concerns about the potential loss or suppression of information related to the January 6th Capitol attack and the investigations surrounding it. 

oh man you was running the committee?

You understand that these are texts subpoenaed by the Jan 6th Committee?

Do you know why you and @*TinyImbecile are such rubes for this ****?
 
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Aug 2025, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2025, 1:31 pm

You understand that these are texts subpoenaed by the Jan 6th Committee?

Do you know why you and @*TinyImbecile are such rubes for this ****?

where are the committees documents?  




no I don’t know why 

BuckNaked » 15 Aug 2025, 1:32 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2025, 1:32 pm

where are the committees documents?  

no I don’t know why

They're available for public view...

BuckNaked » 15 Aug 2025, 1:32 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2025, 1:32 pm

where are the committees documents?  

no I don’t know why

Because you morons suck at the same hairy tit.

They endleesly repeat slogans, and fully understand you are far too **** stupid for detail.
 

*Huey » 15 Aug 2025, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2025, 1:19 pm

that’s nice.  Yet, as usual you can’t verbalize or take a stand. 

When you do so I will take the time to do so.

Took a deeper dive, did you?

Blackvegetable » 15 Aug 2025, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2025, 1:43 pm

Because you morons suck at the same hairy tit.

They endleesly repeat slogans, and fully understand you are far too **** stupid for detail.

details matter why didn’t they call Nancy to testify before the committee?

BuckNaked » 15 Aug 2025, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2025, 2:06 pm

details matter why didn’t they call Nancy to testify before the committee?

Because she was a victim...

If they matter to you, why did you refuse to watch the testimony?
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Aug 2025, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2025, 2:13 pm

Because she was a victim...

If they matter to you, why did you refuse to watch the testimony?

I have a job 

Blackvegetable » 15 Aug 2025, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2025, 1:27 pm

*Huey » 15 Aug 2025, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2025, 1:26 pm

And I posted where it wasn’t.  

Sir, I understand your need to lash out.  It has been an awful few weeks for your ego.

No, you didn't. 

You posted a link....to House propaganda.

Like the little tool you are, Little Tool.


 

 

Sir, all I see is where you ran your mouth and posted a link.  The blubbered something about 43 miles short.  

*Huey » 15 Aug 2025, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2025, 3:15 pm

Sir, all I see is where you ran your mouth and posted a link.  The blubbered something about 43 miles short.

I posted the facts.

Do you doubt them?
 

BuckNaked » 15 Aug 2025, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2025, 2:29 pm

I have a job

When will you have time for Nancy?

Blackvegetable » 15 Aug 2025, 7:04 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2025, 7:04 am

RebelGator » 15 Aug 2025, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2025, 7:00 am

LOL.....your fallback position when routed like a cockroach after the light comes on.

That would require an argument in the form of a syllogism.

That's way above your pay grade.
 

 

Haven't seen one yet from you.

Blackvegetable » 15 Aug 2025, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2025, 3:19 pm

*Huey » 15 Aug 2025, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2025, 3:15 pm

Sir, all I see is where you ran your mouth and posted a link.  The blubbered something about 43 miles short.

I posted the facts.

Do you doubt them?
 

 

 

*Huey » 15 Aug 2025, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2025, 3:23 pm

Haven't seen one yet from you.

It wasn't an "argument", Little Runny..

It was a correction.

Do you doubt the facts?

Take a stand.

:rofl:  
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Aug 2025, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2025, 3:25 pm

It wasn't an "argument", Little Runny..

It was a correction.

Do you doubt the facts?

Take a stand.

You say something?