Nah, I don't care enough. Thanks, though.Blackvegetable » 24 Aug 2025, 4:35 pm » wrote: ↑ From Denver to Brazil, nothing bothers Off-Brand Orbán more than an enemy of democracy facing consequences for their crimes.
read it again.
Get back to me.
**** idiot.
Anymore..
ha ha ha ha ha ha. Rational simplicity won't discuss simple compounding chromosomes honestly of ever changing population living in a series parallel situation equally alive as sole results of genetic details never duplicated twice per total sum hearts beating forward one at a time now each heart has a personal brain navigating space cradle to grave as genetics eternally separates active cycles living now.Zeets2 » Yesterday, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑ Of course I've provided a simplistic example! That's how the process is most easily understood when you're explaining a basic principle to someone who is entirely clueless about the subject. And YES, OF COURSE it assumes that the entire amount of the devaluation is passed on, but that doesn't change the fact! We're NOT talking about ANY other outside factors that can ALWAYS affect the amount the importer charges his customer. There is NEVER any such obligation intended in Trump's policy to add the tariff, WAS THERE? An importer can raise prices for a multitude of reasons that have nothing to do with the tariff OR with the devaluation! It's also quite possible that the currency devaluation could be reduced even more than the amount of the tariff increase, and that would make the price even lower than before the tariff was added.
Care to deny that?
Not that it matters but they were posted to you numerous times. In my sig is a link to the last time I posted them to you. So, if you need them, you know where to find them.Blackvegetable » 23 Aug 2025, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑Post the popular vote margin.*Beekeeper » 22 Aug 2025, 8:21 pm » wrote: ↑ He totally earned it on Nov. 5th, 2024.
Overwhelmingly. Lest you try to forget, we'll keep reminding you that all swing states AND the popular vote went Trump. THAT's all the "earning" he needs.
*Beekeeper » 26 minutes ago » wrote: ↑No.
It's not anything that has meaning since we don't elect a President based on popular vote.
Unless you have some point to make, you can forget me doing any of the work for you. If you want post "vote margin" feel free. But again, it's a pointless metric.
He loves employing that tactic. Broken record is a classic and textbook response for narcissists. That is why I respond with this video instead of reposting what he demands.*Huey » Today, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑ Not that it matters but they were posted to you numerous times. In my sig is a link to the last time I posted them to you. So, if you need them, you know where to find them.
Every time you dodge you make my point.*Beekeeper » 31 Aug 2025, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑ No.
It's not anything that has meaning since we don't elect a President based on popular vote.
Unless you have some point to make, you can forget me doing any of the work for you. If you want post "vote margin" feel free. But again, it's a pointless metric.
Blackvegetable » 23 Aug 2025, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑Post the popular vote margin.*Beekeeper » 22 Aug 2025, 8:21 pm » wrote: ↑ He totally earned it on Nov. 5th, 2024.
Overwhelmingly. Lest you try to forget, we'll keep reminding you that all swing states AND the popular vote went Trump. THAT's all the "earning" he needs.
THIS point??
Using the tully discredited and partisan NY Times and Washington COMPOST as "sources' for anything means you are a LWNJ sheeple.Blackvegetable » 01 Sep 2025, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑ So we STILL have no MAGAt ready to explain why Americans must pay more because Grifty's buddy, Jair Bolsonaro, got his *** in a sling?
**** sheep.
Feel free to post them, with sources.*Beekeeper » 02 Sep 2025, 6:10 am » wrote: ↑ Using the tully discredited and partisan NY Times and Washington COMPOST as "sources' for anything means you are a LWNJ sheeple.
You might want to get some FACTS before you start trying to be relevant to any conversation. Neither of those 2 rags offer much in that regard.
Cannonpointer » 23 Aug 2025, 7:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Like defending chicks having dicks?
That's gotta be the dumbest **** thing you've ever done, Brown - and you've done some stupid ****.
Remember that time you and I saw a dog licking his nuts, and I asked you, don't you wish you could do that, and then you responded, "I'd be afraid he would bite me"? That was some stupid ****, Brown.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom the CBO? when have they ever been right?Blackvegetable » 24 Aug 2025, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.cbo.gov/publication/61697
An Update About CBO's Projections of the Budgetary Effects of TariffsPosted by Phill Swagel on August 22, 2025
We estimate that the changes in tariffs, both by the United States and its trading partners, will reduce the size of the U.S. economy. That reduction in output reflects both negative and positive effects: the negative effects of higher tariffs through channels such as reduced investment and productivity, and the positive effects of additional revenues from tariffs on U.S. imports, which would reduce federal borrowing and increase the funds available for private investment.
The increases in tariffs will make consumer goods and capital goods (the physical assets that businesses use to produce goods and services) more expensive, which will reduce the purchasing power of U.S. consumers and businesses. Those increases in costs will put temporary upward pressure on inflation.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom More frequently than you.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Blackvegetable » 02 Sep 2025, 6:17 am » wrote: ↑ Feel free to post them, with sources.
Of course, you won't.
Because you don't have any.
Where are the FACTS, Fluffy?*Beekeeper » 02 Sep 2025, 7:05 am » wrote: ↑ Just ONE example of more than hundreds of cases...
The New York Times Just Destroyed Its Credibility—and Much More | Opinion - Newsweek
Every time you dodge, you solidify his point...**** dullard...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom