You are so pathetic. I claimed that you gave the definition. I never claimed that you answered this:Blackvegetable » 21 Oct 2025, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑ But I have answered the question, as you've acknowledged..
Is he addressing you? I can tell the difference between someone protecting their character and the other defending an ideology rejecting how evolving works in plain sight just by navigating space equally alive since my conception.Blackvegetable » 21 Oct 2025, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ That's one of two tells to indicate that you're addressing someone who doesn't know **** about Econ.
Keep listening to the tranny media, fruitcake. They would never fib ya.*Beekeeper » 21 Oct 2025, 7:11 am » wrote: ↑ I would say I agree with you, but then we BOTH would be wrong.
Blackvegetable » 21 Oct 2025, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ That's one of two tells to indicate that you're addressing someone who doesn't know **** about Econ.
Cannonpointer » 21 Oct 2025, 7:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Keep listening to the tranny media, fruitcake. They would never fib ya.![]()
Where did you study Economics, Fondler?*Beekeeper » 22 Oct 2025, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑ Correct. Because IN ADDRESSING YOU, YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT ECONOMICS, ****!!
See, you TOLD ON YOURSELF and and TOO **** STUPID to understand that simple FACT!!
You've never had an economics class in your ENTIRE LIFE!! I've had plenty and you must be extremely jealous of that FACT too!!
You're right..*Beekeeper » 22 Oct 2025, 7:25 am » wrote: ↑ I don't answer your questions.
Just applying YOUR methodology. UNTIL you start answering OUR QUESTIONS, you get JACK ****!!
See, this is easy.
3 semesters of undergrad econ, plus 2 more for the MBA core.*Beekeeper » 22 Oct 2025, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑ Your "Degree" in "Russian Studies" taught you NOTHING about economics other than Marx SOCIALIST IDEOLOGY from the school of **** IDIOTS!!
Deny that one, DICKBREATH!!
all handlers of reasonable doubt legalities say that.
Is this tripe^ meant to DEFEND your tranny media, ***?*Beekeeper » 22 Oct 2025, 7:20 am » wrote: ↑Are you done trying to undig that hole you're in??Cannonpointer » 21 Oct 2025, 7:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Keep listening to the tranny media, fruitcake. They would never fib ya.![]()
Cannonpointer » 22 Oct 2025, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑ Is this tripe^ meant to DEFEND your tranny media, ***?
Blackvegetable » 22 Oct 2025, 8:18 am » wrote: ↑ 3 semesters of undergrad econ, plus 2 more for the MBA core.
Then there are the curricula for the Series 79, CAIA and CFA - Levels 1&2.
You've listened to a lot of radio.
*Beekeeper » 22 Oct 2025, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑ You once again, know NOTHING except the usual LIES and **** you spread with impunity and indignity.
Do you wonder WHY no one believes you??
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
Deal:Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:
1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense.
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat
2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..
3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers.
Moron.
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
****. If true, then Brown is worse than I thought, because you don't know **** about econ.Blackvegetable » 22 Oct 2025, 8:18 am » wrote: ↑ 3 semesters of undergrad econ, plus 2 more for the MBA core.
Then there are the curricula for the Series 79, CAIA and CFA - Levels 1&2.
You've listened to a lot of radio.
Is THIS^ the tripe that you think defends your stupidity?*Beekeeper » 22 Oct 2025, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑ Any more insults you want to toss out there?? Seems you are still digging!!
How would you know?Vegas » 22 Oct 2025, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑ ****. If true, then Brown is worse than I thought, because you don't know **** about econ.