Your genius would starve a lot of people. Your ignorance will fry the planet.Cannonpointer » 23 Nov 2025, 9:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Ah, yes the "environment." The new stand-in for "kids" - as in, "What about the kids..."
Given y'all's commitment to murdering as many of them as possible and gaslight the remainder, I can see why you would seek another shield for your agenda.
Perhaps at last YOU will be the one to help me understand why the farts of the tensof billions of wild hogs, wild deer, wild elephants and musk oxen and water buffalo and zebras and wildebeests and giraffs and camels and rinos and hippopotami and rlsnf snf bison and buffalo and yaks and kangaroos bears and kudus and antelopes do not threaten our climate - only the 1.5 billion cows that humans rely on for meat.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
And not for nuthin? Beans make you fart hang on, Gaia, we're breaking out the Beano!
Do you EVER feel any shame at the childish **** you believe and peddle, you gull?
You are one dumb ****.Cannonpointer » 23 Nov 2025, 9:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Your link ducks the question.
You claim a BRAZILIAN company bribed him. But he is tariffing Brazilian goods - which would include that company's goods.
Showing me that Brazil processes beef hardly addresses my issue.
Oh, wait. It's you. And that was a question.
Right.
Blackvegetable » 18 Aug 2025, 5:16 am » wrote: ↑ Has FOX told you?
It makes no sense, right?
C'mon, Idiots....find the courage to admit it...
You are one fooled ancestral displacement that won't accept all you were since a fertilize cell dying to fit into a social narrative promising life wasn't your self evident behavior cradle to grave.
JohnnyYou » 23 Nov 2025, 11:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Your genius would starve a lot of people. Your ignorance will fry the planet.
In terms of biomass (total weight), however, livestock, primarily cattle and pigs, make up the vast majority (60%) of all mammal biomass on Earth, with humans accounting for 36% and wild mammals just 4%.

FINALLY! PTL!
C02 is 4 100ths of 1% of the atmosphere. And it is a weak greenhouse gas compared to WATER VAPOR. Get your tweed elbow patch sweater out and your mearsham pipe and talk to us about peak oil, ya **** debunked fruitcake!JohnnyYou » 23 Nov 2025, 11:01 pm » wrote: ↑is that refrigerated railroad cars led to the above statistic. Don't feel bad.. I was stunned when I learned it too.
Carbon Footprints are Nancy Sinatra boots for you CP. The emissions for every pound of beef protien greatly exceeds the emissions for every pound of bean protien. Beans may actually have a negative carbon footrpint. India is naturally green with their sacred cows. I have come to admire Vegans.

**** you.
Cannonpointer » 24 Nov 2025, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑ **** you.
If you have a precious point, preciously make it, precious.

So you have nothing?
JBS ARGENTINA, you **** tranny.Cannonpointer » 24 Nov 2025, 11:17 pm » wrote: ↑ So you have nothing?
You cannot explain why a Brazilian company giving money to trump's innigeration soiree has any bearing on Trump blowing Argentina's Trump clone. And APPARENTLY, you expect me to play the sleuth in comprehending your jibberish.
So is it the brazilian guy's business?
Who knows?Cannonpointer » 25 Nov 2025, 10:27 pm » wrote: ↑ So is it the brazilian guy's business?
Why not say so?
Blackvegetable » 25 Nov 2025, 8:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Bolsonaro out of appeals, will start 27-year sentence for coup attempt
The former Brazilian president will begin his sentence for plotting a military coup to stay in power after his 2022 election loss.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/20 ... ence-coup/
The developments reminded Brazilians of efforts by U.S. President Donald Trump, a Bolsonaro ally, to deny the election of President Joe Biden.
Bolsonaro was convicted of attempting a coup, involvement in an armed criminal organization, attempting the violent abolition of the democratic rule of law, aggravated damage of the state’s assets and deterioration of listed heritage....
Asked over the weekend about Bolsonaro’s arrest, Trump said it was “too bad.”
I wonder what the tab for that is....
Holding his own.Deezer » wrote: Seems fair. I drink a premium coffee at home. Costs about 17 cents a cup.
If that goes up and some other problems go away, I'm good...
I fixed your propaganda for you.JohnnyYou » 26 Nov 2025, 4:14 am » wrote: ↑ Who knows?
It looks like what happens in El Salvador stays in El Salvador.
How much has that cartel gang leader made selling the imported unattended immigrant children to the evil global elite sex crime ring? Trump must be making a lot of revenue for us sending those kids to an unspeakable hellish existence. It makes Putin's ALLEGED 40K stolen Ukrainian Kids look like an International Rescue Mission.
I can't disagree with any of that, no matter how gay the source of it.JohnnyYou » 26 Nov 2025, 4:14 am » wrote: ↑ Who's the child groomer sex predator now? It seems like we might get t000o a point someday where it isn't anyone's business except jeffery's again. Everyone ignores it because it is too cringe to look at. Even Liam Neeson steps back from it. And he made a movie about it.
Can we take this Black Vegetable beyond Brazil now? The Senate overrode Pooper's tariff on Brazil I thought? I did see the vote... I am sure hoping they let WEG motors through cheap. They turn elecrons into value. Pun intended..
40%
The 40% ad valorem duty applies to most imports from Brazil, effective for goods entered for consumption or withdrawn from warehouse on or after 12:01 a.m. EDT, August 6, 2025, unless specifically excluded. Products covered by Section 232 duties are not subject to the new 40% IEEPA tariff.
The Monroe Doctrine will go to shyt. Trump has too much touch now. A touch too much in Argentina. With recent events I began to think about crying for them, and ended up crying "Crap!, My Tax Dollars were used as a Foriegn Campaign Donation!" At least the CIA used to keep that shyt in a room to themselves.
Well, thanks for the reply. I do care about kids futures and I abhore and detest any abuse.Cannonpointer » 26 Nov 2025, 8:33 pm » wrote: ↑ I fixed your propaganda for you.
I can't disagree with any of that, no matter how gay the source of it.
Something something broken clock something...
There is no such thing as fair trade in social realities sustained by the tyranny of intellectual manifested fate within one's ancestral lineage of this species socially trying to prove genetics cannot be the single source of eternal separation daily between generation gaps of current life in this atmosphere.Johnny You » 27 Nov 2025, 5:23 am » wrote: ↑ Well, thanks for the reply. I do care about kids futures and I abhore and detest any abuse.
I do not think it is fair to label every liberal a child groomer. And I think if you study the demographics of the offenders you know who they are. I will continue to respectfully ask you change my label on this site. Maybe someday I will have full restoration of digital rights if you guys ever feel a sense a guilt. You guys get high on the power.
We were discussing here at home the subject of drag queens in elementary school. I tend to agree that parents have a right to provide consent for the content of the education their children are exposed to. I am recalling how the PE teacher taught us in sex ed what a dick is in 3rd grade and that it is ok and normal to do the whackadoodle. I din't think it was until the 5th grade they taught us what a vagina was and how the opertion works. Mrs was not on board with any helicopter educational surveillance.
Evidently, a troublesome male teacher told a kid (5th grade) in our circle (who is a little bold) to "Suck My Apples" in class. The Mom is going to make a complaint, and evidently she is not the first about the dude.
Do you like Turkey?*31stArrival » 27 Nov 2025, 7:20 am » wrote: ↑ There is no such thing as fair trade in social realities sustained by the tyranny of intellectual manifested fate within one's ancestral lineage of this species socially trying to prove genetics cannot be the single source of eternal separation daily between generation gaps of current life in this atmosphere.
Ancestries that understand natural limitations of time alive navigate living by hearts beating and personal brain navigating their own relative time alive living one at a time exactly where they are every rotation lived since conceived into personal location adapting their body as never same total sum achieved twice equally living here now.
Chromosomes in DNA are used against each ancestor in a court of criminal law, same as their social behavior relative to social identity performed in civil court judging how each ancestor every generation gap here stay in character contextually nurtured historically now, cradle to grave.
Historical patterns of behavior following established laws governing who's who every second of rotation 365.2422 days a year regardless the year has 365 or 366 rotations labeled 7 figurative days a week 52 weeks annually as 8 seasonal shifts work between 2 solstices and 2 equinoxes annually regardless lunar phases which species of plant or animal, predator or prey, asexual, male, female ancestor generationally displaced daily here.
Inorganic matter sustains universal positions perpetually balancing specific locations in the geographical universe while organic results are spaced apart in specific atmospheres located within solar systems inhabiting space among all galaxies revolving around each other as specifically seen in the night sky from the planet life is specifically living to that location and best example is Earth from personal experience of each brain navigating time alive since conceived so far.
Instincts sustain empathy about being alive at the same time regardless which generation gap added to a specific ancestral lineage of the geography of their planet until voluntarily ignored by every generation gap lived in previous 400 generations combined into current events obeying social consensuses cradle to grave ancestrally performed now.
There is one in the oven now. I don't dislike it, but once a year it is enough as leftovers last about a week. I prefer chicken, beef, pork, certain types of fish more.
That is your perspective.JohnnyYou » 27 Nov 2025, 5:23 am » wrote: ↑ Well, thanks for the reply. I do care about kids futures and I abhore and detest any abuse.
I do not think it is fair to label every liberal a child groomer. And I think if you study the demographics of the offenders you know who they are. I will continue to respectfully ask you change my label on this site. Maybe someday I will have full restoration of digital rights if you guys ever feel a sense a guilt. You guys get high on the power.
No.JohnnyYou » 27 Nov 2025, 5:23 am » wrote: ↑ We were discussing here at home the subject of drag queens in elementary school. I tend to agree that parents have a right to provide consent for the content of the education their children are exposed to.
Yeah, we didn't have any of that. We jus0t had Coach Gwaltney, who liked to line us up naked in 8th grade and stare at our junk.JohnnyYou » 27 Nov 2025, 5:23 am » wrote: ↑I am recalling how the PE teacher taught us in sex ed what a dick is in 3rd grade and that it is ok and normal to do the whackadoodle. I din't think it was until the 5th grade they taught us what a vagina was and how the opertion works. Mrs was not on board with any helicopter educational surveillance.
I cannot fathom what would be wrong with sucking on apples, beyond the somewhat preposterous logistics of the exercise. I mean, sure,he SHOULD have said organic apples. Everyone knows that conventional apples are on the Dirty Dozen.JohnnyYou » 27 Nov 2025, 5:23 am » wrote: ↑ Evidently, a troublesome male teacher told a kid (5th grade) in our circle (who is a little bold) to "Suck My Apples" in class. The Mom is going to make a complaint, and evidently she is not the first about the dude.