Lmao!
Is that yer back-up internet name?
By NOT posting one, you PROVE you have no definition.Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2025, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑ I do...clearly.
You have a definition in my own words to prove it.
Post your definition.
@Vegas will be pleased to hear that..*Beekeeper » 20 Aug 2025, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑ By NOT posting one, you PROVE you have no definition.
Smart people defend themselves BY POSTING the definition when requested. DUMB AS **** idiots duck, dodge, and refuse to.
Which are you??
Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2025, 6:24 pm » wrote: ↑ @Vegas will be pleased to hear that..
I prove I've posted a definition, and you change your handle to "BV'sLittleBitch".
Deal?
*Beekeeper » 20 Aug 2025, 7:16 pm » wrote: ↑ And if you don't, what's in it for ME??
Oh, that's right, nothing.
Sucks for you that I refuse that offer, huh??
And since you refuse to answer and POST YOUR DEFINTION, we can safely tag you with the LATTER!!
I already have....**** idiotAnd if you don't
Because you're also a cowardSucks for you that I refuse that offer, huh??
I've posted it...And since you refuse to answer and POST YOUR DEFINTION, we can safely tag you with the LATTER!!
This is probably the first and only non-satirical piece to come out of their offices...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom ask the mods... @Deezer Shoove shoved my link abiity here up his azz because he can't handle the content. He is weak,,
When??
*Huey » 20 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑
WASHINGTON, D.C. — As President Donald Trump continues to hint at taking action to require in-person voting in U.S. elections, Democratic leaders warned that a mail-in ballot ban would place undue hardship on dead voters.
Ever the champions of the rights of deceased voters, Democrats alleged that any move to ban mail-in ballots would disenfranchise millions of dead people who vote Democrat in every American election.
"We can't allow President Trump to alienate our dead voters like this," said Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi. "Our late supporters are vital to the success of any Democratic campaign. Banning mail-in ballots will make it far more difficult — if not impossible — for our vast crowds of departed base to make it to the polls in person and cast their votes for Democratic candidates. The Democratic Party itself would be as dead as our supporters."
Other Democrats warned that dead voters are almost completely reliant upon mail-in voting to make their voices heard. "This is such a large pillar of our support," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said. "President Trump continues to search for ways to rig elections in his favor, but we cannot let him cut off such a large portion of our perished constituents. To all of our dead supporters out there — we will continue to stand up for your right to mail in your votes for Democrats."
At publishing time, Democrats urged the Supreme Court to intervene by ruling that all of their supporters who live in other countries and are not legally allowed to vote be allowed to vote legally.
https://babylonbee.com/news/dems-say-ma ... rce=nypost

*Beekeeper » 21 Aug 2025, 6:23 am » wrote: ↑ When??
Did you use invisible ink in doing so, because no one else seems to have seen it.
Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.
When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.
None of the Above.. Mormon is the Correct AnswerBlackvegetable » 21 Aug 2025, 6:31 am » wrote: ↑ @Vegas only posted this about 1000x...
You're a **** idiot.
Blackvegetable » 21 Aug 2025, 6:31 am » wrote: ↑ @Vegas only posted this about 1000x...
You're a **** idiot.
Sure..*Beekeeper » 21 Aug 2025, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑ I would say you are wrong. I am sure @Vegas will confirm that as well. I take his word over yours all day long.
AND, if that is the case, then you POSTING YOUR DEFINITION to confirm that is the case should be child's play!! Or not, since you appear to be running once again!!
So we can safely call you a LIAR on this one. Again.
*Beekeeper » 21 Aug 2025, 7:26 am » wrote: ↑ I am sure he will, AFTER you post yours to compare!!
Until then,
JohnnyYou » 21 Aug 2025, 5:54 am » wrote: ↑ ask the mods... @Deezer Shoove shoved my link abiity here up his azz because he can't handle the content. He is weak,,
*Beekeeper » 21 Aug 2025, 7:26 am » wrote: ↑ I am sure he will, AFTER you post yours to compare!!
Until then, we call you a liar and a very dishonest one at that!! How do we know that YOUR DEFINTION wasn't stolen from @Vegas and now you are saying it's yours?? Oh that's right, we don't. Until you post yours, we call it as we see it- you're a THIEF TOO!!
So you can use it to help you? **** off. Figure it out yourself.