*Beekeeper » 22 Aug 2025, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑ And obviously you don't know the "Bomber story" or you would be reciting it!!
So I guess that makes @rippy 38 far smarter than you will ever be!! Even with all that so called "education" of yours, you are still not capable of defining Survivorship bias, in your own words that is!! Stop stealing those of @*Huey!!
I was first to make reference to it.And obviously you don't know the "Bomber story" or you would be reciting it!!
you are disturbingly **** stupid.you are still not capable of defining Survivorship bias, in your own words
Bstumped...you've done a great job getting out the vote.Blackvegetable » 22 Aug 2025, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑ I was first to make reference to it.
you are disturbingly **** stupid.
Even @*VegasVagina can confirm that I have...

It's well documented the Dead voted for Trumproadkill » 22 Aug 2025, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ Bstumped...you've done a great job getting out the vote.
JohnnyYou » 22 Aug 2025, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑ It's well documented the Dead voted for Trump
They were all from District Hell
Heaven sat it out like Democrats in the fetal position
Blackvegetable » 22 Aug 2025, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑ I was first to make reference to it.
you are disturbingly **** stupid.
Even @*VegasVagina can confirm that I have...
His definition is halfassed. He wants my definition so he can use it to answer the question, because he knows his is far too weak to use. But he is also using it as a deflection to hide behind. My definition is utterly irrelevant to whether or not he knows the answer. If he is confident in his definition, then there is nothing stopping him from using it to answer. He knows it's nothing more than something to hide behind. You know how he is. He does that **** daily.*Beekeeper » 22 Aug 2025, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑ @Vegas says you haven't posted ANY definition nor reference to one.
Take that to the bank because I believe HIM over anything you want to say!!!
THAT explains how others view your character and it's not one you should be proud of.
He just called you a liar....*Beekeeper » 22 Aug 2025, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑ @Vegas says you haven't posted ANY definition nor reference to one.
Take that to the bank because I believe HIM over anything you want to say!!!
THAT explains how others view your character and it's not one you should be proud of.
How did I call him a liar and How did I lie?
Vegas » 22 Aug 2025, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑ His definition is halfassed. He wants my definition so he can use it to answer the question, because he knows his is far too weak to use. But he is also using it as a deflection to hide behind. My definition is utterly irrelevant to whether or not he knows the answer. If he is confident in his definition, then there is nothing stopping him from using it to answer. He knows it's nothing more than something to hide behind. You know how he is. He does that **** daily.
@Blackvegetable
That's what Fondler has to say about it.By NOT posting one, you PROVE you have no definition. Smart people defend themselves BY POSTING the definition when requested. DUMB AS **** idiots duck, dodge, and refuse to. Which are you??
Vegas » 22 Aug 2025, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Did I not say I posted it in my examples a while back? I told you where to find it. You being lazy doesn't make me a liar.
I am under no obligation to be beholden to your laziness.
You lied.Did I not say I posted it in my examples a while back?
Prove it. **** your assertions. Your claim = I lied. Thus, your job to prove it.
**** yours.Vegas » 22 Aug 2025, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Prove it. **** your assertions. Your claim = I lied. Thus, your job to prove it.
I see you are running from my last question. Shocker. How unlike you.
Your claim, your job.Thus, your job to prove it.
Not my job.I see you are running from my last question
You claimed I lied. Your job.
You claim you posted a definition.
Never admitted anything of the sort.Vegas » 22 Aug 2025, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Yep. I did. Make a case as to why I am beholden to your laziness. You refused to read it, per your admission.
Like I would expect you to admit it. Duh.